Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
8 pages (2238 words)
, Download 1
, Book Report/Review
Free
He argues that a sport is executed according to certain regulations. An individual studies the sport by observing how others go about it. Nevertheless, we proclaim that it is executed in line with such-and-such directions since an onlooker can read these guidelines off from the training and rehearsal of the sport (Wittgenstein Sec54).
Moreover, he was an advocate of ensuring that the natural rights of human beings were protected and that these rights could not be trampled on by any other human being. Hobbes developed a methodology that he used to study the connection between human nature and politics and the manner through which it was possible to create a balance between the two so that chaos in society could be avoided.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Descartes’ evil genius argument is the argument that he advanced to demonstrate that all sensory knowledge can be doubted. Descartes argues al the knowledge that we hold as true is nothing but the deception of an evil genius. Descartes imagines that an evil genius, supremely powerful and clever, has directed all his energies in deceiving him.
Moral excellence is consistent with Aristotle’s virtue ethics which should be the objective of every person. And such moral excellence can only be achieved by reason which is the form of ultimate good and happiness. He rejected desire as a way to achieve happiness. Human excellence is the full development of our faculty while freedom is the autonomy to reflect doing a certain thing.
Bacon also believed that there are serious impediments to human understanding; Bacon, however, understands and explains the impediments to human understanding in different terms. For Bacon, the impediments to human understanding lie in general human nature, individual personality, language that human beings use to communicate.
Still, sometimes abortion may be a result of the mortal danger for the mother of the child; the pregnancy may also result from raping – thus ruining the mother's psychics and causing mainly hatred to the unborn children as well. Thus the question is raised, whether it is moral or immoral for a woman to have an abortion?
Anarchy system has certain advantages and these are; is the search for complete freedom as people work all by themselves. It is also an essence of power for the people where each man is for himself. The negative side of the anarchy system is that there are no rules and regulations to stop the people from committing terrible acts such as murder.
However, according to scholars, the threat is really serious as income inequality prevents the American dream from being realized. The issue is worth-discussing thus, the given paper will provide the opinions of different scholars and prove that in order to save the American dream it is essential to struggle with income inequality.
The Roman Catholic Church has considerable subscribers who perceive union in marriage to be exclusively between individuals of the opposite sex. God sanctifies that union. Moreover, Watkins (46) asserts that it signifies the world approaching the end times as inscribed in the Book of Revelation where immoral acts were predicted towards the end of the world.
Empiricism refers to perspectives that ensure the validity and the esthetics of the experience and knowledge. Empiricism objects to the idea of innate knowledge while rationalism advocates for natural knowledge. Rationalism refers to the general direction of accepting or agreeing as to the only essence of the logical thinking experience and reality-driven.
6 pages (1569 words)
, Download 1
, Book Report/Review
Free
Charlie Marlow is the main character of the book and represents the author. Marlow is involved in the journey because he is in search of himself. The book majorly identifies the issues that are linked with imperialism. The adventure reveals the torture and cruelty faced by Marlow in his outer journey.
While proclaiming happiness the ultimate end of life, he provides an account of different kinds of lives that can be lived by a person. The first one, he says, is the life of gratification that is full of pleasure and comfort (Davis, 2011, p. 66). In spite of the fact that it may lead to some sort of happiness, the philosopher dismisses it as merely a shadow of it.
In the psychodynamic perspective, the psychological abnormality is defined as the disorder that eventually is the consequence of anxiety, which has been significantly been developed because of the unresolved or unconscious aspects. The key strength of the definition is that the treatment mechanism focuses over-identification as well as resolving the conflicting situations.
David Hume rejects the idea of self - which is existing in the long run. There are only sensations or perceptions that change every moment they are being perceived. The basic claims by him would be provided below. 1. All thoughts are eventually gotten from impressions. 2. Along these lines, the thought of a continuing "self" is, at last, got from impressions.
Just as learning to the association an apple’s taste, appearance, and smell. There is absolutely no reason to relate all these as collective material sub strum. It was a mistake for Locke to suggest that ideas of primary qualities had the status that was special since they rose from several senses. Even though, the corpuscularism hypothesis produced results that were interesting (Shapiro 1986).
Therefore, the concept of bad conscience argues that a person is responsible for the behavior of other people, though this connection may not be a direct one. In other words, all people in the world are united; so a misdemeanor of one is the partial fault of a different person. Levinas continues this idea, proving that people should not only feel responsible for the actions.
Human beings of any status have certain knowledge that guides their reasoning, behaviors, and interaction with the environment. Once gained, the memory particular in the brain becomes the temporary or permanent storage point for knowledge. Human beings are usually born with tabula rasa brains and have to learn or gain knowledge as they grow through experiences.
Philosophy questions Question I. a True b True c True d True e True since in B-rule every voter offers a linear ordering of the underlying candidates by assigning them a score as the last candidate are ranked with least points
f.) True as every
According to Descartes, two individuals may differ in the color of an object or the shape of an item (Haldane et al. 288). Color and shape seem so obvious yet people may have varying opinions about them. That is the premise of one of Descartes's meditations on doubting that lead to the dreaming argument.
People hold certain beliefs that guide then as to the kind of actions that are morally right and wrong. However, the problem arises when one encounters a situation of moral choice that does not fall within the purview of his or her beliefs as to what is morally right or wrong. Moral philosophy is largely concerned with what makes actions right or wrong but not the kind of actions that are right or wrong.
This is because the West had linguistic shortcomings that were noted by Erasmus. Latin Church fathers could not overcome the limitations. Erasmus seemed to be relying on the scripture and church fathers for the interpretation of the parable of tares (Linkels, 2013, p.53). Erasmus saw the scripture as an appropriate benchmark for testing the purity of everything.
Faith and reason are the main sources of justification of religious beliefs since they can both perform this particular epistemic role. They are sources of authority forming foundations of beliefs. Many philosophers and theologians have conflicting reasoning about these two aspects and are worried about how rational beings should treat claims arising from them.
David Hume was doubtful about the presence of the self. Nonetheless, he doesn't state plainly, what makes up a person. Hume believes that everything that can be known through an impression. For example, I know that there is a chair here because I have an impression of the chair.
Most philosophers assert that the motive of a person is a significant determinant of whether an action is morally right or wrong while another outline that the intention is a key feature of morally right actions (Rachels 18). Accordingly, others assert that moral right or wrong depends on the existing virtue system while another outline that it depends on the duty owed to the person.
The debate about whether society should be oriented towards serving individual interest or collective good has received diverse responses. The argument about the moral issue is a contentious one and has, over time, been meted with diverse responses. Thinkers and philosophers in the past have argued variedly about the issue regarding moral imperatives.
On the other hand, an artificial virtue is a disposition for which none of the above assertions hold true (Hume, 1978). Thus, it is clear that natural virtues are those that naturally elicit a spectator’s approval while artificial virtues do not evoke such approval. When looked at from another perspective, it seems that the spectator’s approval for artificial virtues is similar to that of natural virtues.
After critically analyzing Klemke’s view of science, let us critically looked at Karl Popper’s demarcation criterion, also known as the falsification method. According to Popper, science proceeds through conjectures and refutations. According to Popper, the criterion of distinguishing the scientific and the non-scientific disciplines is the principle of falsification.
In the use of private reason, it is very important for one to obey and strictly follow the guidelines given by a particular establishment or organization so that they do not risk being demoted from their positions of leadership. It is equally important so that the authority of the establishment does not undergo collapse, as well as the establishment itself (Putnam, 2000).
He argued that much as most of the world operates according to the force of gravity and other automatic force, society operates in the same manner (Sousa, n.d.). Of the two theories, the one which is the better is positivism, which attributes the source of knowledge to scientific and empirical origins. Unlike foundationalism, positivism is scientifically explainable.
He considers master morality as covering good and bad where slave morality covers good and evil. Nietzsche is opposed to the philosophies of Plato and Kant in terms of morality. He rejects the idea of Jesus that the weak shall inherit the earth where he states that the only things the weak inherit are leftovers from the strong (Nietzsche 22).
Rudner conceived value judgments as being endemic to science. Rudner argued that, in the choice of scientific hypothesis, it is not possible to give a complete verification or a complete falsification. For this reason, therefore, Rudner concluded that the choice of the scientific hypothesis must involve some value judgments.
Constant literature about the history of science makes the revolutions seem real. The research documents events as they happened and is continuously written and rewritten to accommodate any upcoming views of modern scientists. The books discuss the various theories in detail with the negatives and the positives leaving the reader to decide which side to follow along.
The term philosophy comes from the Greek community. The Greeks used the term philosophy to describe love and hunger for wisdom. Thus, most rational and wise thinkers among the Greek people were referred to as philosophers. According to Soccio, this group of people included both men and women who had wise of their decision-making and curious to know various things in life.
Even in the 21st century, the matter has not yet been resolved, with some ideologies maintaining that the disabled are lesser human beings, subject to correction. Others claim that they are human beings and should be accorded every right and privilege as other people, while still, some people will agree with the philosophy that the disabled do not meet the criteria for human beings.
Kant opined that beauty has a connection with the form of an object as it has boundaries around which its aesthetic appreciation can be made based on an objective assessment of an observer (Illetterati, 2014). In effect, the judgment of beauty is an objective assessment of the desire for an object even though that particular feeling of pleasure does not develop the desire.
7 pages (1781 words)
, Download 2
, Book Report/Review
Free
Finally, Plato’s theory helps in understanding the theory and existence of Forms. In the Republic, Plato reveals the existence of various forms of things such as false, truth, good, beautiful, and justice. Forms enable us to discuss, debate, agree or disagree on various issues such as justice and beauty found within the real world of truth (Plato 453).
However, even though Descartes’ arguments and skeptical assumptions seem to be reasonable, they lead the exploration into a vicious circle of indefensibility. Descartes' method might be useful for discerning objective knowledge from the deceptive; however, it is not fully rational and objective as long as it is based on such vague grounds as intellectual intuition and doubt which are not objective enough to prove any existence.
Theory and observation both have exceptional applications, functions, and uses and have to be comprehended as individual concepts prior to one analyzing how both of them work together in the field of science (Proctor, 1998). These two concepts of observation and theory are both connected to the uncovering of the truth (Longino, 1983).
2 pages (500 words)
, Download 2
, Book Report/Review
Free
According to Freud, the mind is made up of the conscious and the unconscious mind. The id, which operates at the unconscious, is responsible for Eros and Thanatos feelings. Eros (life) instincts usually operate at a higher libido (energy level) than Thanatos (death instinct) so that it is able to overcome suicide or murder tendencies.
Individuals find themselves in a moral dilemma. Moral dilemmas are challenging and tactical events in life. In the incident, an individual faces a challenge in the choice of actions that places him or her in a moral dilemma regarding the best choice. Each action presents a test of morality and each is justified based on a moral reason.
The article focuses on four branches of Bacon’s ideology and they include the mind, the body, and their leagues. In addition, the article further examined the relationship between the body using natural philosophy, philosophy of the man and the moral philosophy. They argued that imagination is a powerful aspect that influences the conception of cure.
This implies that before taking an action, an individual should first consider that the consequence(s) of the action would be the greatest good for a major population of the people. This stresses the fact that the overall sum of the utilities that are because of action should be better than the overall sum of the utilities that result from an alternative action.
The nature of death has always interested in multiple philosophers, theologians, and even ordinary everymen. However, as Alan Sachs has reasonably noted: “Death is more universal than life” and this claim definitely makes sense, because what lives will be dead one day and what exists will be obligatorily discontinued.
Descartes said that he doubted the existence of the physical world, but he knew that he existed. Descartes believed more in the existence of the mind than that of the physical body. He said that, even though all that he was experiencing was an illusion, he was certain that what he was experiencing was taking place. This proved that he exists because he was the one experiencing the illusion.
One of the strategies that Socrates used to win an argument with Meno was questioning some of the assumptions that Meno had made. When asked to define Virtues, Socrates questioned most of the definitions Meno gave, leaving Meno to question if he too could define virtues appropriately. Socrates views virtues from a different perspective from Meno.
According to Heraclitus, the flux doctrine espouses the opposites are united. This often includes shifting or changing from one time period to another time period. As things change with moving time, our world still remains the same. For example, liquid water turns in to rain, this rainwater can be collected and frozen into solid ice form.
5 pages (1338 words)
, Download 1
, Literature review
Free
Baertschi (2008) argues that glass is brittle, and it tends to break off when it falls on the ground. Precisely, the glass often breaks because of its possession of the molecular structure. So, the molecular structure of identity is what makes it what it is in the present form. Likewise, a full human is not any different from what a fetus is because of that where life begins.
every day’s activities and responsibility, each and every individual has to make decisions that can either be short-term or long-term. The option and the responsibility of having to make daily critical decisions are referred what is known as a moral doctrine. Utilitarianism, an example of an ethical theory, is very difficult to understand.
However, strictly adopted, the self-evident tactic can lead to a Martian morality through clashes with various deep human responses. It is shocking that if obeying God results in Abraham agreeing to sacrifice Isaac his son while secular principle concerning impartiality results parents having limited places in the lifeboat to state to his or her children.
The Difference between Kantian Categorical Imperative and Hypothetical Imperative: the difference between Categorical imperative and hypothetical imperatives lies in the fact that, while the categorical imperatives are absolute and admit of no exceptions, the hypothetical imperatives are relative and admit of exceptions.