Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
There are various moral perspectives that can be used to explain the just war theory including virtue ethics, deontological and utilitarianism. However, utilitarianism is the theory that is the most practical for explaining just war in the contemporary world. This is owing to the fact that countries go to war for various reasons and some of them are justifiable.
Most people powered by instincts know that a single day oncoming they will explain all the dreadful things they have conducted and thus leads to the essential understanding of moral absolutes. The overriding point is that in case God does exist, eminent terms like “justice," "morality" or "purpose," are typically not abstract notions and thus God has a reason for creating every individual.
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Thomas Hobbes is one the most popular philosopher for his ethical and social theory about the political structure of a community in the form of his book Leviathan. His work in the book Leviathan is actually based upon his social contact theory. Hobbes’s political philosophy head off from a number of premises and all of these premises are self-evident in their nature.
The concept of perpetual peace has been adopted in various modern forms that include politics, conflict and peace resolution initiatives. According to the philosopher, there is always a period in which a nation enjoys the relative benefits of a peaceful co-existence. Peace promotes the development of various sectors of the economy.
There is a need for hierarchical, rather than egalitarian conception on aesthetic notions. This would allow mankind to make an aesthetic and nonaesthetic distinction in a useful way and provide answers to art critics. This paper suggests that aesthetics judgments are not possible, though the aesthetic is an aspect that can be defended in art philosophy.
Hume concludes that suicide does not contravene any of those three categories, and the paper determines whether or not Hume’s argument above has cogency or not. This paper posits the thesis that there are some valid objections that can be made with regard to the overall logic and universal applicability of some of the arguments of Hume relating to suicide and its acceptability.
“Jesus, you startled me. I wasn’t expecting you here.” His face looked sort of delighted. Joseph Nye: How are doing uncle Fukuyama? Fukuyama: I am fine thank you, how are you doing my boy? Stretching his hand out to Joseph Nye. Joseph Nye: I am doing okay uncle, long time. (Looking surprised). I did not expect you to hear uncle, what brings you to Leo University?
He worked towards propagating equality and true justice in his famous work “Gorgias”. He also discussed other facets of life like the immortality of the soul in his book "Phaedo". However, to date, the views of Plato on justice remains one of the most studied and debated work among the literary works of Plato and other contemporary philosophers of his time.
However, some prefer to be given power and essential gratification. He indicates that the individuals how accepts that the virtues of a true friendship are of supreme good are totally correct, even though the virtues themselves are what creates and sustains a true and good friendship between human beings. Without these virtues, true friendship cannot exist.
19th century was a phase where democracy was beginning to take root on the continent amidst political mayhem seen in the aftermath of the French Revolution. Moreover, it is these events which shaped the thinking of both Marx and de Tocqueville in matters concerning government and its role in society.
In same-sex marriage, the issue of property is of high relevance as well. In case a different-sex marriage fails, ex-spouses may have a divorce and share their common property when each owns a half. In modern American society, gay and lesbian couples can get married, but they do not have the right to have a divorce (Yalom and Carstensen, 2002).
Critically analyzing and reviewing both books, the –isms concern is common. Memmi’s focus in The Colonizer and The Colonized is colonialism, with other issues that surround the concept of colonized and colonizers. Bosmajian dedicates a whole chapter of his book to white racism, a topic of similar interest to Memmi.
The strength of the individuals is sacrificed in favor of the "group force" since strong people find that they are relegated to the background and should make serious concessions to remain part of the group. Here Freud refers to a certain Nietzschean theme: the subordination of powerful people to morality.
In Junod’s Falling Man, individuals who view the picture see willpower, stoicism, a portrait of resignation: others view something different, something discordant and thus, terrible, denoting freedom. You can feel something rebellious in the man's pose, as if, once faced with the certainty of death, he opted to carry on with it:
Human beings of any status have certain knowledge that guides their reasoning, behaviors, and interaction with the environment. Once gained, the memory particular in the brain becomes the temporary or permanent storage point for knowledge. Human beings are usually born with tabula rasa brains and have to learn or gain knowledge as they grow through experiences.
Enlightenment movement started by the intellectuals of 18th century whose critics towards the European culture including political, social and economical structures, attitudes toward the humankind, the dominant doctrines and institutions of Christianity created a big impact. The movement underlined human reason in order to achieve individual liberty, freedom, and finally progress.
Constructivists may also be considered revisionists because they usually set forth that concepts of health medicalize behavior which does not follow normal patterns or which do not follow normal values (Sarkar and Plutynski, 2010). For example, people do not like anxiety, therefore, it can be considered a disease.
To conclude, my new philosophy of eating is formulated based on the principle; eat nothing unless it’s worth eating. Another major point in my eating philosophy is that eat less while working less and eat more while working more. Avoidance of non-vegetarian food as much as possible is another major point in my new philosophy of eating.
Different philosophers at different times tried to define the concept. St. Augustine said that, as long as he was not asked to define the meaning of leisure, he knew what it was, but if asked about its meaning, then he could not definitely describe it. Really, leisure is one of the few popular concepts that are excessively difficult to define.
In view of the fact that (contrary to Hume's first ‘a priori argument’) the quantitative requirements for a miracle testimony need only be that of a successful probability as opposed to a proof; in view of the fact that our miracle test-case of the alleged resurrection of Jesus seems to satisfy the qualitative requirements of credible testimony.
Women are currently barred from serving in more than 220,000 positions in the United States military. This is due to the policy that was revised 17 years ago in which women are barred from serving in infantry positions, special forces, tanks, combat engineering, and other specialized ground combat positions.
There are 7 continents in the world. In a single continent, there are several countries. Each country has its own race and culture. Migration has brought different races into different countries in the course of time. A person may look different from the others in a particular place however that does not mean that the person is lesser.
These two statements depict two ways of looking at technology and its relationship with mankind. Neither one is absolutely right or wrong. The first phrase summarises the ambition of mankind in a nutshell. It throws light on man’s constant urge to apply, invents, innovate, and improve upon its inventions and innovations.
Therefore, unlike a machine, there is no pre-determined knowledge for a human being, although he needs familial tradition and societal norms to help him determine his self-identity. As such, human intelligence is free. Freedom, in this context, means having the power to choose your own decisions and desired actions.
Another important realization that this course helps in the making is that reading about and gaining knowledge about the works of other writers and philosophers is not enough, in fact, students should polish their skill of criticizing and interpreting a text because a writer leaves a lot of room for the readers to draw their own conclusions.
The next reasoning that could be developed is the idea of how philosophers can be malicious. To this extent, there is barely any stinging joke like the case where Epicurus obtained the making of liberty on Platonists by calling them Dionysiokolakes (Walter 56). This meant the Dionysius flatterers and that it is not genuine at all.
People with similar views, perceptions, and thoughts about death have formed groups to promote their beliefs. One group, for instance, is afraid of death because they do not know what happens after one dies. Some people are scared of death because they do not want to lose their loved ones. On the other hand, some people are not scared of dying because they think death as a means of connecting to God.
Morality is a philosophic discipline that entails standards and principles which evaluate the conduct of an individual in regards to his or her actions. It focuses on how bad or good one's conduct is. It is regarded by society, religion culture, and family setting. On the other hand, ethics is about the decisions which we make.
It suffices to say that what is true for the non-depiction characteristic of pictures is similar for the logical form of the propositions. It is impossible for language and also pictures to say what is common about their structures as they can only show it as they depend on the logical form that is mirrored or can be seen in them.
All the arguments that Berkley presents have been successful simply because, at the end of it all, he manages to use Philonous to change the perception of Hylas that matter can be perceived as the cause of the existence of all things; the theory material substance is simply baseless and at the end of it all, Hylas chooses to no longer defend.
Assessing knowledge in modern society is through rationalism and empiricism, which deals with experiences and faith respectively. Religious and scientific theories differ in their definition of reality, but they have similarities in dealing with invisible things, end of the world and seeking wisdom through extensive studies.
Practicing categorial imperative ethics which is to do good all the time will not only address the social ills that the lack of ethics created. It will also make our society, and our world a better place to live in because people want to do good for its own sake and not because it is only a means to achieve or get something.
The controversial issue about global warming remains not just a scientific issue, but politically, economically, and socially, it ignited varying responses and diversified reactions leading to the point of questioning the exactness of science involved in it. Our knowledge about global warming has widened up as we heard many things about it.
This new form of production increases the competition rate. Since the commencement of the 19th century, the environment of the industry has been fluctuating from time to time between periods of crisis and periods of prosperity. The Communist Manifesto ends the discussion by stating their role as they work with other societal parties.
The debate about the existence of God is one of the oldest in history with some people asserting this belief as a delusion propelled by the need of people to feel connected to a greater power. Religion seeks to clarify that God exists in Himself and will always exist in the present. Indeed the idea of God not existing is logically contradictory.
Although different professions engage in different kinds of activities, all of them are always perceived as methods in which human life can be improved. Ranging from medicine, engineering, poetry, and education, the aim is always the same. However, different philosophers would tend to argue that not every practice leads to an improved human life.
There are however arguments that have been set against psychological egoism. Some psychologists believe that people should be motivated by the call for doing the correct thing as well as what is the common good. It becomes that the person should not be motivated by their self-interest but the greater good of the larger community.
I was a doctor will live up a straight life in my society and show a good model to other people. I will not shrink from helping other people and I will show compassion to people who are not well of and those suffering from poverty. It is my responsibility to show humility, reverence to life, and show empathy to a person who is not well off.
Later better ways were discovered that overcame slavery and this phenomenon merely died. This means that such inventions develop with time and eventually wither off. Thus it won't be wrong to say that humans are merely responsible for their condition and nature is a catalyst that promotes this reaction.
Bentham fared better than Kant for the former encompasses the categorical imperative of the latter, and will not even require the test of the categorical imperative to determine the morality of an act. For Bentham, the mere fact that suicide hurts the individual or his family already constitutes its evil nature.
Johnson’s last set of arguments follows the theist’s retreat back to the last bastion of religious belief: faith. Basically, to the theist who claims that he does not know why God permits evil and who thinks he does not need an answer because he has faith, Johnson replies that this is only justified if one has good evidence that God is good.
Towards the end of their argument, Socrates was the speaker in effect, and Thrasymachus a mere follower of his speech. When Socrates said: “Then, my blessed Thrasymachus, injustice can never be more profitable than justice” (Plato 208), Thrasymachus replied: “Let this, Socrates, he said, be your entertainment at the Bendidea” (Plato 208).
The Iliad is set in the world of Greek heroics and how they conducted their battles. The Achilles, who is a renowned warrior of that time, is preoccupied with material greed, and he does anything to ensure their reputation within the community is intact. Achilles and Hector often boost and taunt each other as witnessed in the final duel.
What is evident is that mental states are simply representational functional shapes within the system of the human body. These mental states may either have a qualitative touch or even quantitative. The various factions of functionalism have a huge role to play in attaining phenomenal consciousness. This has some absolute certainty in it.
If Hitler were a man who loved animals and children and if he had a child, he would have judged the father as good even though everybody knows that Hitler murdered many people. This is unacceptable to the writer and it indeed makes a lot of sense. Similarly, a man cannot judge God as good on the basis of the so-called “higher morality”.
I tend to agree with Bringsjord who through Searle’s concepts appears stronger than him in opposing the success in creating artificial people. His strongest point is that a mind is what differentiates between people in life and that it uses much more than just pre-installed physical properties in achieving its intelligent nature.
Having made the mention of mathematical judgments Kant now asserts that “In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgments “a priori” are contained as Principles” and takes his arguments one step further. He relies on the solid support of the science of mathematics and articulates that “mathematical judgments” are invariably synthetic.
This splits down the options into two, giving one of a sinful nature and one of a regenerate nature. For instance, in the religious faction, an unbeliever cannot choose god out of his or her own free will. Libertarian free will does not restrict the freedom of an individual in accordance with his or her nature or religious beliefs.
This causes civil disobedience. Diverse authors, philosophers, and leaders have varied opinions on civil disobedience. Proponents of civil disobedience highlight its effectiveness in correcting unjust laws.
The root of Aristotle’s development of ideas and beliefs in his famous and most celebrated text can be traced back to the formulation of what comprises of ethics and what or who can be identified as an ethical person on the basis of philosophical foundations. Asserting Aristotle’s assumptions of ethics, Sherman brings the concept of the vicious versus the virtuous person in the dynamic.