Law Essays

Having exhausted the fundamentals of arbitrations agreements, it is plausible to note that privity of contract is synonymous in both local and international laws of contract except where it impacts on administrative interest. That notwithstanding, every arbitration law endeavours to provide protection to its parties without necessarily attracting legal relations.

In author’s perception, though the conditions may be suitable to break such laws owing to the fact that it would not hurt anyone, it will be critical to obey implemented traffic laws and stop. The rationale behind this is that individuals have a tendency to learn various habits which may become difficult to eliminate.

The author provides a good example, the antitrust case against Microsoft. The 2001 US antitrust law case against Microsoft was triggered by the fact that Microsoft was growing at an exponential rate, amassing great wealth, resources and power. Microsoft’s tight grip and control in the market made Microsoft executives want more control.

According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that the prosecution will try to prove that Tom was indeed controlling a prostitute for gain and he would assault her if they did not comply with his demands. The prosecution will prove this by presenting several pieces of evidence discussed in the paper.

The candidate must have the right motivation to participate in the intensive supervised probation program. He intends to use the period to prove that he has abandoned his illicit ways and use the platform to use the skills he gained in college. Kris intention to marry after a successful probation period is a guarantee that he will be a perfect candidate in the program.

When the officers go to serve the individuals concerned with such arrest warrants, the individuals may choose to lock the offices out of their residence, so that they do not receive the warrants. The individuals can also opt to harm the officers serving them with the warrants or even harm themselves to ensure they are not arrested.

The study leads to the conclusion that as evidence to the contract of carriage, the contract may have negotiated orally and the terms agreed upon by the shipper and the carrier long before the bill of lading is issued as the discussion above had explored. In this case, the terms of the contract may not all be included in the bill of lading itself.

Gracie may be held liable for tort for the broken ankle suffered by Brenda and not the employer, under tort for vicarious liability, because the act in issue did not occur in the course of employment as contemplated in the Salmond Test. A master is not responsible for a wrongful act done by his servant unless it is done in the course of employment.

Peter wishes to demand specific performance of the contract between him and David regarding the house as he intends to live, at the very least, the stipulated 10 years of the contract. In doing so, Peter needs to affirm the contract exercising his right of election as a result of the breach of contract.

In a contract of sale, it is important to understand when the title to the goods passes and also when the risk in the goods passes to ascertain the rights. The law relating to a transaction of sale is so complex that it requires a number of details including the basic terms under which the contract was entered into to decide on the issues.

An e-mail sent through the company e-mail id will be seen as an official company statement. Any e-mail that tarnishes the public image of the company will be harmful for it. However, the company is not obliged to monitor all e-mail messages. In case of disputes, the company will try to distance itself from the case as much as legally possible.

Kim Johnson has pledged to not being guilty and has claimed for affirmative self –defense along with the defense of other suspects in the case. During the trial at the court, evidence was revealed, for and against the suspect of the murderer, i.e. Kim Johnson, who is the defendant in this case (Thomson Routers, 2014).

The Court explained that the manufacturer is not required to contemplate misuse by any careless, ignorant, or incompetent person (Murphy v. Cory Pump and Supply 382). The alleged defect in this mower was not latent or concealed (Murphy v. Cory Pump and Supply 382).

Tracking the historical progress of International Human Rights evolution turns our focus to all those aspects that have plagued the human race since the inception of human civilization. Great humanitarians, philosophers, social activists and general people have raised their voice against torture of human beings in different times.

Politicians can sometimes resort to political expediency when it comes to certain social, political and economic issues. This is a good way for how democracy works out because it shows that politicians are at least quite sensitive to the public purse. However, there are some issues which can get very contentious like the issues of divorce, etc.

The police force apart from maintaining civil order is generally charged with the responsibility of protecting private and personal property, enforcing the law and investigating the crime. In order to achieve their core purpose and mandate, police officers are often given power by the law to use force.

First presented in 1996 it remained in a point of limbo and contention that was never approved. It would be altered and represented over the next decade and a half. Presently we cannot know for certain how many individuals living in the United States who are, in fact, here illegally, but it’s estimated in the millions.

This discussion talks that the detective was questioned about what was discovered in custody of the defendant. In addition, the detective responded that he together with his colleagues stumbled upon lottery tickets concealed in a manner to be utilized as pouch something that proved a plan to distribute heroin.

This essay analyzes that there are also many theories such as the just deserts, rehabilitation, incapacitation, that also try to justify the use of punishment in modern society. However, the 2 aforementioned theories are the widely popular ones. Our judicial system also finds itself often foiled by a technicality that often sets a criminal free.

However, when the element of consideration is concerned, it brings us to the issue of Roger’s oral promise to Magda Contractors to pay an additional sum of 5000 pounds if the contracted work was completed on time. At the outset, this raises the issue of Magda Contractors going back on the original contract by raising new terms.

In English common law, the obligation of the arranger to the participant banks is also recognized and that liability also arises in cases of misrepresentation. In the case of Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman (1990), the Court established three criteria in assessing liability for negligent misrepresentation is outlined.    

Insurance services are offered by insurance companies commonly known as carriers or employer self-insurance. Employers with less than four employees are exempt from workmen compensation and so is the case for domestic servants. Workers are entitled to benefits only if the accident or death arises in the course of employment.

In the case of Daulia Ltd. v Four Millbank Nominees Ltd, this same nature of unilateral contracts was extensively discussed and formed the crux of the decision against the plaintiff. The Court declared: “The true view of a unilateral contract must in general be that the offeror is entitled to require full performance of the condition…”

Dicey is stating that unlike written forms of Constitution, the British Constitution is an evolving conceptual embodiment of the will of the people, not a document that forces its will upon the people.  As such, the interpretation needed to set precedence and decide the matter of law becomes more contentious. 

The accuracy of whether it would appear that no patient has the absolute right for a comprehensive and truthful answer to a specific request in circumstances where a responsible body of medical opinion would properly contend the patient was unentitled to an honest reply is very high.

From this paper it is clear that England and Wale’s sources of law are often categorized as either internal or external. The internal sources include the statutory laws and the common law. The external law includes the ECHR and the EU laws. Internal laws are the laws that are created by the law-making organs of the two countries.

Under Article 4(1) of the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome 1980), “To the extent that the law applicable to the contract has not been chosen in accordance with article 3, the contract shall be governed by the law of the country with which it is most closely connected.

This discussion therefore makes a strong argument on the circumstances where the jury’s verdict must be unanimous in the united states and in common law traditions. On the same vein concludes that, not all state verdicts have to be unanimous, with the two cases manifesting the jury voting.

The author states that in the current atmosphere of free trade and the prohibition of restrictive practices that has been introduced into the European Union with the EU Competition law, there can be little doubt that Japan’s restrictive practices are aiding and abetting the country’s manufacturers in gaining a competitive advantage.

The author of the paper states that when assessing a claim for negligence the claimant has to prove that a duty of care existed between the parties. The claimant than has to show that the duty has been breached  and as a result of the breach the plaintiff has suffered harm  or financial loss.

 The given work is designed in order to analyze and evaluate the following statement “While ‘enlightened’ positivism retains the centrality of formal sources as the core of international legal discourse, it is more flexible, recognizes the change in patterns of state behaviour and wider methods of determining state consent and evidence of that consent” .

 The judgment in the Twentieth century Fox and the Motion Picture Association of America vs. Newzbin, the defendant was found liable for infringing on the MPAA copyrights through facilitation and sharing copyrighted material with the public for which it received payment (Lambert) and therefore guilty of authorization of secondary infringement. 

 Violent crime refers to a delinquency whereby an offender employs or threatens force upon the victim. The heightened incidence of criminal and violent activities in the rennet years has become a major concern globally. Violent crimes have been known to be caused by social, biological, and environmental factors. 

The author states that in England, property has been defined as consisting of the proprietary rights, meaning that technically, property refers to the rights of ownership. The major laws that define property such as the Law of Property Act 1925 and the Trustee act 1925 have continued to provide a general definition of property.

The author chose the following cases: Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. vs. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.,  Kelo vs. City of New London,  Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. vs. Samara Brothers, Inc.,  Anderson vs. City of LaVergne,  Dearborn vs. Real Estate Agency,  Rhudy vs. Bottlecaps, Inc.,  and Kain v. Bluemound East Industrial Park, Inc.

Creme is a pharmaceutical company has its trade doing well in Marmara, Turkey. However, the company has decided to open more market for the business by extending the distribution to Black Sea region as well. The firm chooses to offer a different package of agreements depending on the party due to the nature of the business.

In a typical democratic governance system such as the one in the UK, the arms of government consist of the executive, judiciary, and legislature. In order to ensure separation of power, each of these arms has its roles and duties clearly defined to it. Each arm of government also has some level of power and authority attached to what it does.

One of the most primary questions of law is whether a particular court has jurisdiction to preside over a certain case. A question of jurisdiction may be broken down into three parts: whether the court has jurisdiction over the subject matter: and whether the court has jurisdiction to render a particular judgment sought.

This research will begin with the statement that Malcolm and Shaw defined a will as a legal document which is written by a person appointing a testator upon his death who shall be responsible for his estate and shall disperse the deceased’s property as directed by the deceased in the will.

The essay details the foundations of Comparative Law and its connection with global productivity and globalization. The main points of socio-cultural values and comparative legal traditions are discussed in the essay as well. Furthermore, the essay attempts to analyze the conflicts between Non-Western and Western management systems and strategies.

The conclusion states that the trustees acted on their own premises instead of considering an opinion from the beneficiaries; they transferred their managerial role to another party which is of questionable integrity; third, there is no formal agreement and communication between the beneficiaries which begs the question whether they are reading from the same page or not.

The basic motive of this project is to explain how the Bill of Rights influences law enforcement, prosecution, and correction agencies and identify the amendment, by number and constitutional protection it affords, and provide a case example illustrating each of the four amendments (Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eight Amendments) protect individual freedoms.

The paper tells that the law of torts is specifically designed to protect the interests of the other people so that they do not fall victim to negligent acts of other people that may result in injuries. The law is also meant to ensure that justice prevails in the event that the defendant’s action has resulted in the injury of the plaintiff who will be entitled to get compensation for the injuries.

The researcher states that most of the world civilizations have thrived on the suppression of individuals and certain groups of people. This occurs as a certain group of individuals retain socio-economic and political advantages at the expense of other individuals. Suppression also occurs when powerful entities such as the government infringe on individual liberties and rights.

The paper tells that in case the courts rule that Congress is unable to enact the requirement for individuals to buy collision insurance using the Commerce Clause, especially if they find that this power is not supported by the Commerce Clause, this latter argument will be crucial in proving that, Congress will be seeking to impose taxes on those who chose not buy insurance is reasonable.

This research essay analyses the need for a written constitution for U.K and its benefits for U.K citizens in detail. Britain is regarded as the homeland of the democracy. Further, politically, U.K has been steady and stable for long period. Unlike Germany and France, Britain has not been compelled to draw its constitution due to famous revolt.

According to the paper many aspects regarding this already exist and have resulted in what is “referred to as the ‘four freedoms’: the free movement of employees, goods, capital and services”. In such a situation, the primary reason or goal is that a unified Europe should logically have a unified criminal system.

The rationale for selecting this case is because it is a landmark case in English law regarding the offer and acceptance of a unilateral offer. Contracts are part of human lives whether as corporations or as private parties hence this case gives a better understanding of how to make a valid contract.

respondingly, with the changing time, there have been certain alterations within the needs of the economic system and managing the policies; those are associated with the development of the economy (Clauwaert & Schömann, 2012). The existing policies and the social parameters

Mediation is considered by most courts as a part of the process of litigation. Mediation can also be said to be swift as the mediator will ensure that both the parties are not inconvenienced in any way because the mediator will give both parties enough time and also present to the facts before allowing them to review the main cause of conflict.