Law Essays

The primary challenge is the lack of enough qualified personnel to help the youth. To run a division like ours requires psychologists and counselors, who in this case are limited. There is also a problem of inadequate funding. The programs are meant to help the youth achieve long-term goals. It, therefore, takes a lot of time and resources to complete our schedules fully.

By reducing the availability of firearms, the country would increase the safety of its millions of citizens. However, it would be quite challenging since the arms that are already owned by some citizens would be hard to get back. Many citizens in the country are against the selling of weapons to the public. 

The natural law approach was also applied in McGee v Attorney General. In the case, the judge concluded that the constitution acknowledges God as the main source of authority. The human rights that were applicable in the case also were part of the natural law as it is through God that the authority existed. 

The Supreme Court of Ireland is the major judicial authority in the country and is tasked with the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the Constitution by governmental bodies and citizens. The constitution is a broadly-phrased and complex document, and by necessity, its wordings are intrinsically vague. 

Law is referred to as a social mechanism that is used in controlling society. Likewise, it is prudent that all the students of law must be fully aware of the nature of the formal structure that is linked to law and morality. On the other side, morality is specific principles of conduct that are held by a given person in society.

International law unlike any other law has no particular area or governing body, rather it includes various laws along with customs and rules, which help in governing, influencing, and dealing with respect to the legal interactions among various countries. It also includes different governments, as well as their businesses.

Police discretion refers to the process whereby the police officers have the freedom to execute their duties involving the right to choice or judgment. Police officers face difficulties when it comes to a criminal investigation, thus, the police can choose from a wide range of decisions; whether to search, investigate, bring into judgment, or arrest.

As David and Anne are in default on the repayments, the Bank has the right to sell the property to realize their security. Under section 101 of the LPA 1925, this power is implied into every mortgage made by deed, which further provides that a power of sale arises when the loan or repayment becomes due.

The case began with an emergency call from Anthony's mother, Cindy Anthony, saying that she could not find her granddaughter and that her daughter's car smelled like there had been a dead body in it. She said that Caylee had been missing for 31 days, but her mother had not reported it. The toddler mother, Casey Marie Anthony, 22, was arrested the next day.

The wife disposed of the letter and attempted to aver that the letter of severance had not been received at the address. The court established that the letter had been posted through the letterbox either the day before or the day after his death and that even though he might not have received the notice, the severance was still to be regarded as effective.

The ‘key’ evidence and testimonies were insufficient, and the case itself too weak to convict the defendants of capital murder and bestow on them the death penalty and capital punishment. With the jury caught in a public hysteria and fear of the Satanic cult, they, amidst the deficiency of the evidence, reached a specious verdict.

Generally, The Directive clearly states that single parents are to be given the right to have the reasonable costs of their childcare reimbursed and the UK’s implementation of the Directive under the Act provides that employers are only required to pay nursery fees to single parents where there is a hardship.

Observing the magnitude of physical abuse, as inflicted by Oaf, it cannot be said that it has created a great deal of physical injury to Tom. Still, at the same time, it also becomes evident that the group actually created such an ambience that there was sufficient reason for Tom to think that they actually wanted to harm them physically.

On the grounds of union intimidation, misinformation and even invasion of privacy, the complaint was lodged with CIRB and unfortunately, the CIRB denied their rights for denying the union membership and to make the matter further worse, justified the attempts of USWA in pressurizing the employees to register for union membership.

One example is if A signed the contract thinking that B is buying his original copy of a Picasso painting. Yet, B is thinking that what he is buying is the original Picasso painting, and there is a mistake here that warrants the nullification of the said contract. In English case law, it is called “false and fundamental assumption of a contract”.

The actions of the local justice personnel and law enforcement officers must always be undertaken with utter vigilance and regard for the constitutional rights of the citizens. Pursuing a fleeing criminal, for example, must be done under the premise of diligent and lawful action with proper regard for the safety of spectators and civilians, who might be on the way of the pursuit.

The First Amendment specifically protects peaceable protest. In using an effigy that was made to resemble Mr Piker, it becomes clear that Ms Monique was presenting a visible threat against him. The question now that must be answered is whether the right to speech is more important than the right to security.

The essence of the adversarial system dominates over the inquisitional system. In these terms, the systems of criminal justice in the considered countries are more beneficial than in other European countries (e.g. France, Germany and others). The main emphasis for changes in the US system should be made in the field of real justice of the system.

The chief objective of the Lisbon Treaty is clearly stated in its preamble: “to complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam and by the Treaty of Nice with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action.

Courts have the power to set the terms under which disputes will be resolved or punishment will be imposed in accordance with the laws related to each particular case. Moreover, the power of the courts to promote social reform has led to the development of the Constrained and the Dynamic Court debate. 

A crack pipe with crack residue was discovered on her person.   Additional search warrants were discovered and items for which the appellant was charged were discovered in the home and a car driven by the appellant.  18 photographs in which the appellant was posing in a sexually provocative fashion were also obtained and admitted into evidence.

Do the procedures prescribed by Congress in the Detainee Treatment Act provide protection that the habeas corpus guarantees? Are the detainees of Guantanamo Bay entitled to the protection and can the detainees challenge the competence of the judicial review provisions of the Military Commission Act before they have sought to invoke that review?

The conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Criminal Appeal allowed a review to determine whether or not the Court of Appeals committed an error in allowing the officer making the arrest to identify the substance as marijuana as  “a lay opinion” pursuant to Texas Rule of Evidence 701. 

When police, the respondent, Connor handcuffed him, due to his condition he sustained injuries. After he was released he filed a suit 42 U.S. C 1983 against the respondent, alleging the use of excessive force. The district court granted the respondent a motion to allow Graham to provide evidence for the use of force.

In the US, the president is able to suspend the applicability of habeas corpus. This is in order to establish alternative laws that undercut the legality of the existing habeas corpus. In the history of the US, two prominent examples of habeas corpus suspension exist. The initial suspension occurred, in 1861, at the onset of the Civil War.

It is believed that “HB 440 offers a financing component to the plan.  SB 2 will require the state to contribute the full amount recommended by actuaries to the pension system each year beginning in the fiscal year 2015. Rather than a defined-benefit plan, the legislation offers future public workers a hybrid cash balance plan with a guaranteed four percent return on contributions.

Dubbed the deadliest shooting rampage in the history of the United States, Seung-hui Cho, a 23-year-old seni¬or student at Vir¬gin¬ia Tech, engaged fellow students in a two-hour kind of horror movie on the 17 April 2007 early morning, in the end taking the life out of 32 fellow students and leaving scores with gunshot wounds.

The purpose of the report is to provide the friend with the necessary facts to assist her to make an informed decision. As an interested party in buying a building in the location, it is necessary to be abreast with flood facts of the area. This will assist to help you make informed decisions on flood risk insurance and other issues.

Alistair has entrusted the responsibility to investigate the price-fixing issue in the European offices. Furthermore, after being informed by the lower-level manager, a further investigation was arranged about “the Bosnia contract” relating to unethical practices that were taking place. Alistair investigated the issue.

Bonnie fulfilled an action to incorporate the exclusion clause. By this Ozzblock passed over the liability to Bonnie in circumstances of printing errors resulting from typesetting or employee error. However, Ozzblock needs to have a strong argument to preclude the mistake from the child’s action which was would be Oswald's responsibility to care for.

The goal of the evaluation is to design effective enforcement of traffic laws and accident program evaluation plan for policymakers to determine whether the enforcement of traffic laws could reduce the number of road accidents in the USA. Besides, the plan will determine the feasibility of the proposed traffic laws enforcement measures.

The agreement between George and Maggi to form a different company is not an illegal one because these are two distinct individuals able to engage with free consent. The wrong part is the manner in which it took place where George went behind his fellow directors and established an entity with conflicting interests.

The case of Rory presents the legal hurdle of ascertaining whether he can really benefit from the provisions of the law that grant amnesty to offenders who have problems associating with any of the classes on insanity cushioned from prosecution in law. The right of the client is partly superseded by the state’s need to verify his condition.

The paper 'How the Supreme Court’s Decision Continues to Affect the Rights of American Citizens Today" is a perfect example of a law case study. This paper deals with cases that are related to three of the provisions of the first amendment. It further evaluates the rights and the responsibilities that the constitution gives an American citizen.

The paper "How Mr Johnson Has Sold the Roll Royce to Milfred" is a good example of a law case study. In the article, ‘Discharge of frustration’ written in 2002 it is stated that a contract that is formed can be bought to end by Discharge of the Contract. Discharge of contract by frustration can occur if the performance of the contract is made impossible and the parties are not faulted as per the article, ‘Discharge of frustration’ written in 2002.

The paper "Application of the Law to the Facts" is a perfect example of a law case study. This report seeks to provide a brief summary of an incident involving the Ambassador of Brigadoon at the capital international airport on March 20, 2010. It will highlight the legal issues involved in the incident and reflect the application of the law to the identified issues.

The paper "Australia Business Law " is a perfect example of a law case study. A collateral contract is a contract that involves entry into a different but consecutively-entered contract side by side to the main contract. It usually involves entry into a contract between the main contract holder and a third party either before or during the entry of the main contract.

The paper "Business Law - Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd " is a perfect example of a law case study. Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd constitutes a landmark case, in which the court established the principle of the corporate veil. The court held that the company had a separate personality that was distinct from that of its members.

The paper "Company Law-Based on Statute and Case Law by Using Australian Legislation" is a good example of a law case study. Australian company law is deeply borrowed from English company laws. Currently, its legal framework entails a single, national statute, that is, the 2001 Corporations Act. It is worth noting that Corporations Act provisions override case law.

The paper "Legal Issues and Actionable Steps - Winston Graham " is a perfect example of a law case study. The Act on the sale of goods of 1979 and its variations defines the obligations and performance of the seller and buyer in relation to a transaction that involved the exchange of goods with a price and in this case the price is defined as money.

The paper "Employment Law - John Davies " is an outstanding example of a law case study. In this case, John Davies has been performing his duties well before the illness that greatly impaired his performance. John’s responsibility as a researcher is a demanding job with a wealth of data to be summarized and reports written about them under tight deadlines, it requires constant concentration.

The paper "Law Case between the Plaintiff Mr. Adami and Defendant Maison De Luxe Ltd" is a good example of a law case study. The plaintiff was Mr. Adami and the respondent or defendant was Maison De Luxe Ltd. Adami was suing the company for wrongful dismissal that was a breach of their contract in writing.

Employee interests have effectively been described and a better working environment and remuneration terms have been achieved. Considering that many employers earlier subjected employee to very unfavorable payment and working terms, we cannot fail to acknowledge what the employment tribunal have brought forth (Janice, 2011). 

The paper "Standard Health Care Ltd v Gorman " is a perfect example of a law case study. Employment law exists to give employers proper guidelines and rules that are to be followed when they have to dismiss an employee. Thus, employment law with the help of the ACAS Code of Practice which is in No. 1.

The paper “Salomon vs Salomon - Limited Liability of Incorporated Companies, the Doctrine of Corporate Veil” is a convincing example of a case study on the law. The decision in Salomon v Salomon made it amply clear that companies run by single persons or one-man companies could also obtain protection under the doctrine of the corporate veil.

The paper "Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp versus Archer Daniels Midlands & Company" is n outstanding example of a law case study. Infringement law prevents any unauthorized duplication of copyrighted work. Under US law, this is done by offering civil remedies such as injunctions and damages to the infringed parties.

The paper "An Analysis of Two Fraud Cases in Australia" is a perfect example of a law case study. According to recent research carried by Smith in 2003, fraud has become a widespread problem across many countries both the developed and the developing. Fraud can be defined as a deliberate deception, which is made with the aim of achieving personal gain or damaging another person or entity (Cohen, 2006).

The paper "Application of Law on Case of Natalie" is a perfect example of a law case study. Each state in Australia has enacted legislation concerning partnerships. However, partnership definition does not differ across the jurisdiction. To determine whether there is the existence of partnership the following criteria is thereby used.

The paper "Business and Corporation Law" is a wonderful example of a case study on the law. There are possible legal arguments in connection with this legal dispute, there are a total false pretense and a breach of contract. Tony entered into a contract with Bruce by providing false information about the contents o the agreement knowingly as was in TPC v Cue Design Pty Ltd A Crim R 500; ATPR 41-475.

The paper 'Commercial Law - Ellen" is a great example of a law case study. Persons engaged in commerce or trades are governed by commercial law in as far as their rights, relations and conduct are concerned. Ellen has entered into the contract of lease whereby the local council will determine her final decision in the contract making.