Law Essays

The paper "Maple Overview" is a perfect example of a law case study. Large business organizations like companies and corporations find it quite challenging in managing and setting targets for the entire organization. Sometimes, directors of the company find themselves in total disagreement over managerial issues that might be critical to an extent of affecting the normal operations of the company.

The paper 'Jenny Lu and Romeo Situation " is a good example of a law case study. The decision that Jenny Lu had to make was whether to act as a whistleblower based on suspicions that she had regarding one of her co-workers, Romeo. As the acting project manager, Jenny considered the probability that if her suspicions about Romeo’s sabotage were right, her efforts and those of her colleagues towards the project proposal which was supposed to be given to the customers on Friday would go to waste.

The paper "Rules and Laws in Egypt" is a perfect example of a law case study. Egypt is among the most popular countries in the Middle East and Africa. The nation is known for its huge population thus it is ranked position fifteen worldwide; as the most populated country. More than eighty million people live around the fertile areas of the nation such as the banks of river Nile whereas the rest occupy large regions of the famous desert of Sahara.

The paper "Federal Supremacy and State Sovereignty" is a good example of a Law Case Study. This paper presents a review of two case studies. As presented by the facts from the case studies analyzed, the central legal issues of interest are determining whether the defendant has committed an offense for being in possession of the prohibited or controlled substance.

If the penalties and the compensation method is satisfying all the persons involved in the trading and the persons who are victims there is no necessity for criminalizing insider trading. So the first thing to implement is fairness and transparency. Everybody who resorts to insider trading must inform beforehand.

The act also includes the duty owed to a special visit by the occupier and ways in which the occupier's van be exempted from liability. This act was very important because it introduced liability to landowners and landlords who were not responsible enough to maintain their property in a way that would ensure safety to all levels of visitors and even tenants.

Ramsar sites are matters of national environmental significance under the EPBC Act. Any action that is likely to significantly impact the ecological character of a Ramsar site must be assessed and approved by the Commonwealth Environment Minister (Clarke, 2005, p235) according to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 (Cth), s16.

The force is usually on standby and its operations are usually funded by the government. This unit has been in operation as early as 1967. Its officers have been involved in both home and international rescue missions and have participated in several international rescuing like the Haiti earthquake. The team has been registered with the British government, the United Nations, and the International Civil Defense Organization.

The main point of reference with regard to fire and rescue services offered by the U.K. would be the Fire and Rescue Services Act of 2004. This paper will also cover the ethical consideration of the fire rescuing team as well as the immediate roles of the practitioners. Introduction Earthquake refers to the sudden release of energy on the earth's surface that creates seismic waves.

Therefore there was a need to have a team of professionals that can organize rapidly and carry out proper search and rescue services in the affected areas. The UK international search and Rescue team is one of the teams that are members of the United Nation allowed to carry out search and rescue services. There are various organizations that contribute to the UK search and rescue team.

The section also guards against persons who knowingly continue to trade using the company assets in disregard of the court's directions on insolvency proceedings. S213 primarily was introduced to address compensatory mechanisms for people who have suffered loss as a result of fraudulent trading made by the directors of the corporation.

Advocacy exists in a wide range of forms including peer advocacy, citizen advocacy, systemic advocacy, professional advocacy, and collective and individual advocacy. Notably, advocacy plays a great role in the protection of human rights or fighting against discrimination by preventing abuse and denial of rights (Tufail, 2007). The advocacy uses a case study of a disabled girl who is not allowed to participate in a school’s art project.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and numerous allied international agreements are aimed at protecting intellectual property rights because of the significance in sustaining economic growth (Richard, 2008). This paper will analyze the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and its purpose, the Samsung vs. Apple litigation case, the Intellectual Property laws in UAE.

The other intellectual property is copyright, which consists of literary and artworks like books, poetry, movies, music, and artworks like drawings, pictures, statues, and architectural designs. Rights allied to copyright consist of those of performing artists during their performance, recording, and those of broadcasts during their radio and TV programs (Davis, 2000).

In this regard, this paper will compare Eastern countries such as Oman, KSA, QATAR, and Western countries such as the UK, France, and Italy in terms of freedom of politics, religion, and speech. Freedom of speech in Oman, KSA, and Qatar In Oman, there have been many arrests recently by the Oman authorities who want to take all legal measures. Most of the arrests made were due to freedom of speech.

In this case, we are looking at a contract of refurbishment that failed and its implications. The facts of the case are highlighted below and their implications are discussed in conjunction with the NEC application form. A contract of construction failure occurs when the client is not satisfied with the work done which s viewed by the project manager as executed.

The law on copyright provides the author or rights holder with several remedies against people who infringe and these include administrative sanctions, precautionary measures, criminal penalties and civil redress. According to article 34, the author or the successor has the right to request the court’s head to take defensive measures against copyright infringers.

This Act also ensures the control of the environment and nature. The Act ensures the protection of those under the watch of the employer; including visitors, customers, and contractors among others. It gives authorities the mandate to review the conditions of employees and the company. However, this Act gives the mandate to conduct regular employee checkups.

It ensures that employees, as well as the public, are protected from work activities. In addition, companies need to ensure safety measures are put in place to ensure that cases such as accidents are easily detected and emergency actions are taken such as sounding of alarms while facilities such as first aid equipment should be availed to ensure any accidents are mitigated immediately and victims assisted.  

It is the duty of employers to protect their employees from any harm while at their place of work. While some incidences may happen as accidents, all the measures are supposed to be taken by the management to ensure that even with the accidents, the workers are safe. With reference to the case in point, the management of Fresha Bakery did not play its part in protecting the two workers.

Both criminal laws and civil laws provide clear guidelines on the various laws and the consequences of contravening such laws. In analyzing the case study, we will give much focus to the way in which the management and organization of the bread factory’s activities were conducted and whether the standard of care taken was adequate under such situations.

They did not ensure that plants and systems are maintained and safe without any risk to health. Sub-section (2) provides for an extension mechanism that can be used to compensate for the dependents of the deceased. Section 2(2)(b) brings a clear picture of the incidence that happened in the bakery and how that can be used in the court of law.

The main puzzle that led to the establishment of this treaty was that there were unclear strategies and international laws for regulating the use of nuclear weapons. Many countries were possessing nuclear weapons that threatened the peaceful existence of world peace if each country was left to use the weapons anyhow (Graham 2004).

Either, governments claim that legitimizing the obstacles serves the interest of harmonizing the operations of the NGOs in the spirit of dealing with terrorism and countering extremism (Friedman, Elizabeth, Hochstetler, Kathryn & Clerk, 2006, p.108). However, NGOs have the option not to succumb to the regulatory barriers. This paper tries to examine the principles that seek to govern and protect NGOs from government intrusion.

This report aims to evaluate the compliance of the OHS act on Jim’s farm, which is located in Ontario, Canada. The 500-acre estate deals in corn farming and dairy keeping and it is run by Jim, who is assisted by his family in carrying out the farm operations. Jim’s farm has employed seven salaried workers who help in the operation and maintenance of equipment and machinery.

As a result, any decision by the judges based on such evidence is unfair and questionable. Some of the issues associated with the use of expert opinion in the courts include undue esteem to the expert in complex fields, the use of one expert’s testimony, and lawyers’ lack of understanding of the limitations of the field.

To avoid such violations, the grand jury has to eliminate any doubts in their testimony by introducing expert witnesses for their opinion. The Common Law in the United Kingdom (UK) today focuses on the qualifications of the expert witness and the subject matter. An expert witness is classified as qualified if they have expert knowledge.

In fire investigations, the experts ate usually allowed to provide their expert opinion about the scientific criteria that provide a clear understanding of the evidence. This is aimed at enabling the jury to make appropriate decisions. The use of expert opinion in fire investigations is common since some fires are caused by arson.

According to the legal practice in the United Kingdom, opinion by experts in various fields is admissible as provided for within the jurisdiction of common law (Munday, 2007). As a form of laissez-faire, the expert opinion is applicable in the process of legal practice as adequate evidence, with little emphasis on the reliability of the opinion.

physical evidence ranges from microscopic items to massive objects, which are generated as part of the crime that is recovered at the scene or other related scenes/locations. Considering the numerous data and information available in video surveillance, testimonies, and confessions, physical evidence plays an integral and important role.

The paper 'Kahn-Freund’s Observation, Salomon v Salomon" is a great example of a law case study. The principle of separate legal entity provides that a company exists as a completely separate legal entity from that of its shareholders. According to Khan-Freund, the principle has provided an avenue by which the interests of creditors to companies have been abused as a result of failure on the part of courts of law to overcome the rigidities provided by this principle.

The paper 'Mutual Trust and Confidence in Employment Contract in Australia" is a good example of a law case study. The concept of mutual trust and confidence in employment agreements has been in existence for a long time. The question of whether the term, which is also known as the duty to act fairly and reasonably, is implied in the employment contracts in Australia has received mixed reactions.

The paper 'How Raj Claims against His Employer " is a great example of a law case study. Accounting for Small Businesses has appointed Sarah as the new office manager. However, she cannot relate to the employees because she is authoritarian and discriminative. After she meets with all employees and orders them to report to work on time or risk being asked to do additional work, Raj arrives rate the next morning because his train had delayed him.

The paper "The Claims Raj Can Make on the Grounds of Wrongful Dismissal " is a perfect example of a marketing case study. Summary dismissal for a first offence can be termed as fair if gross misconduct if warnings will not be effective or in case a warning has already been given. Under Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, workers have a right not to be dismissed unfairly.

The paper "The Saudi Labor Law" is an outstanding example of a law case study. Saudi Arabia, also known as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is one of the most successful and powerful states in the Middle East. The country enjoys global recognition and respect as the origin of Islam housing the most prestigious Islamic shrines in Mecca and Medina.

The paper "Vicarious Liability - Enjoy Spa " is an outstanding example of a law case study. As demonstrated by Neild (2013, p.707) an employer is rendered vicariously liable, when his employee commits a tort, in the course of his employment. Vicarious liability owes its development to the perception that an employer is better placed to undertake compensation for an accident than his employee who has caused the same, during the course of his employment.

Generally speaking, the case involving Mohammed, E & Z Company, and L&G Company is based on warranty of merchantability, express, and implied warranties in sales of goods contracts. E&Z agrees to sell electronics to Mohammed, who also agrees to enter into an agreement with the company and buys a refrigerator.

The paper “Corporate Law - Executive Remuneration” is a meaty example of a case study on the law. Executive remuneration refers to the total pay a top manager in a company takes home. This usually includes the basic salary plus benefits such as bonuses, deferred and restricted stock, pension and gratuity, vesting periods, along with other terms of employment.

The paper "Corporations Law - Chance Limited" is a perfect example of a law case study. Directors of a company play an essential role in ensuring that the company is able to achieve its goals and objectives. According to section 201A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), each registered company must have directors.

The paper "Contracts for the International Sale of Goods - Worldnews and PrintCo" is a great example of a law case study. The law of contract comprises of a set of rules that govern the validity content of an agreement and the relationship between two or more parties regarding the sale of goods. Contract law is, therefore, a promise that the law enforces (Chen-Wishart, 2012).

The paper “Ехесutivе Rеmunеrаtiоn and the Тwо Strikеs Rule” is an outstanding variant of the case study on the law. There has been controversy in executive compensation since the 1990s. Executive remuneration has also come under substantial media scrutiny. There has been public anger towards executive compensation especially since the advent of the global financial crisis.

The paper "Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws" is a perfect example of a law case study. Mason, John and Janice were celebrating after passing their degree after the celebration at Window Point they decided to go to Look point. Look the point is nearer the cliff but was separate the cliff from the people was a fence that was put by Willow Council the fence is about 2 meter but the cliff is clearly seen even from far.

The paper “Corporations Law - Directors’ Duty to Prevent Insolvent Trading, Defenses for Directors” is a great example of the law case study. The Australian corporate law defines a limited company as a legal entity, separate from its directors and it is formed through legislation. It has a right to own property, it can enter into contracts, and has the ability to sue and be sued as an entity.

The paper "Commercial Law Case: Hamid and Kathy" is a wonderful example of a case study on the law. The issue at hand is one of a valid contract. What Hamid needs to understand is about these elements that make a valid contract that is enforceable by the law. A contract is an agreement that is legally binding and it is formed between two or more people.

The paper “The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel to Prevent Unjust Outcome from Strict Application of Common Law” is an engrossing variant of a case study on the law. If one makes a promise to another person and the one who is promised relies on what is promised in good faith to his/her detriment, such a person may want to seek justice.

This case study will give a comprehensive evaluation of the case summary, the applicable legislature, and the magistrate’s court decision on the case. Social justice and ethical issues and the role of human service workers will be discussed in detail. Mr. Brown is Mrs. Brown’s husband who has been accused of controlling behavior by his wife.

The study identifies three major issues. First, whether the directors exceeded their power when they borrowed 1m? Whether Martin’s action to purchase a fleet of the vehicle was binding to the company? And lastly, whether, the directors acted within their powers in making their contributions and the remedies available to the company.

They also called for the government of Columbia to assist them in the fight against these cartels of drugs. The fight on these drug cartels has not been totally won, but there has been a significant drop in its drug use rate. This can be attributed to the efforts of the federal government in conjunction with the government of Columbia.

The contracts, whether implied or expressed in writing, legally bind the two parties and have legal implications (Yates, 1976 p. 205). There are several cases where the contracts are not adhered to by a party or more. The situation is, therefore, a breach which means that the prior sets of agreements are not kept as per the contract.

When Wayne Williams was arrested and charged, there was no DNA testing, yet it was important at the time because a forensic scientist discovered two human scalp hairs inside the shirt that Patrick Baltazar’s body had. Police and the FBI had to testify using a microscope to show that the hairs were consistent with those of Williams.