Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The significant problem that was found and expected by all analysts in different studies was the uneven growth in the emerging markets. The reason for this was predicted due to unplanned agenda. Different studies and analysts wrote that the unfinished or unplanned agenda was due to the lack of planning for the future.
Thus, in conclusion, it may be stated that in view of all the legislative provisions that have been addressed above, there is an adequate provision under the law to rigidly and strictly enforce a standard against obscenity so that the members of the public and especially vulnerable children are protected from an onslaught of obscene material transmitted over the Internet.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
The former is, in essence, a particular method that aims to look at the decision-making activities in the international organizations where the power is decentralized into the member nations and all of the decisions are made by a complete sense of unanimity and union. In other words, there is complete accord between the decisions thus made.
s, powers, liabilities, obligations and restrictions from time to time created or arising under the Treaties, and all such remedies and procedures from time to time provided for by or under the Treaties, as in accordance with the Treaties are without further enactment to be
The author states that privacy, in its most obvious sense, connotes the capacity to keep certain information secret. The state, as a result of the extensive filed of regulation entrusted to it, has a constant need to obtain, monitors and evaluate information. The law must indicate the scope of any discretion conferred on the competent authorities.
This brings us to the issue of public order. It is quite clear that public order is capable of being preserved without the offense of blasphemy – a law that is yet to be made use of in this century. The general criminal law, including offenses relating to incitement and offensive behavior, covers this area adequately.
Contempt of court may be defined as any willful disobedience to a court order or any misconduct in the presence of a court. It is also described as an action that interferes with a judge's ability to administer justice or that affects the dignity of the court 1. There are two types of contempt of courts recognized by the judiciary system
This is a direct application of the test of the ‘hypothetical member’ whose role extends to the long-term effects of the alteration of the articles on the company. Based on this hypothetical case-reasoning, the Court observed that such alteration is also valid since under this circumstance the minority shareholders would benefit by the alteration
Scotland maintains its own separate court system, but still functions along the lines of a unified legal system within the U.K, where the legal advocacy system was first split into Solicitors and Barristers in the nineteenth century, when the Bar agreed to concede the administrative aspects of the profession as embodied in conveyancing and direct client access to the solicitors.
The author states that the crime rate also got its place along with the growth of civilization with an upward trend and increase. The need for rules and systems was felt to preserve calm and harmony. Subsequently, social norms, folkways, mores, and taboos came into being to bring regularity in society.
As stated above, the position of law is that once the goods are ascertained and identified, the property in them would pass to the buyer, since they are now at the buyer’s risk. However, if the goods are identified and the price for the ascertained goods are not paid by the buyer these consequences may not follow
The Judicature Act 1873, had the effect of abolishing the old court system replacing them with a single system which had a dual purpose. That purpose was the administration of both principles of equity and common law. ‘The Act created the Supreme Court of Judicature, which consisted of the High Court of Justice, the Crown Court.
As illustrated, Cameron accepted the offer on October 5th, a day after he became aware of the fact that Jack had already sold the mobile phone to someone else and had given the effect of revocation. In this respect, Cameron could not have accepted the offer because his acceptance came after the offer had already ceased to exist. Hence, Cameron cannot oblige Jack to sell him the mobile phone despite the lack of a formal revocation.
If Raj’s acceptance had been sent by post then it would have been deemed to constitute an acceptance as soon as he posted his letter. An offer cannot be accepted by the offeree unless and until the offer is communicated to her and silence cannot be construed to be acceptance. Although the Courts have held that acceptance is complete when posted.
Damage to property was considered a serious offense and was treated as a felony. The category included burning of property, killing of domestic animals, destroying plantations, destroying a fish pond or riverbank, damaging a piece of cloth when it was worn, attempts to demolish a house, breaking into a building to steal and arson.
The difficulty with the rules of consideration is often encountered in trying to understand or identify some congruity in the line of authorities. This difficulty itself is evidence of the primary rationale behind the doctrine of consideration. Its primary function is to draw a line between a mere promise and a legally binding agreement.
Developing theories is encouraged, but remember, until proven fact, they’re just theories. Always be honest with yourself about your theories, and do not let them solidify into fact within your own thinking without the support of facts that rule them as theory, firmly establishing them thusly as facts.
Although Simon, Tanya, Dawn, and Rose are UK nationals, the free movement of workers throughout the European Union is permitted under Article 39 of EU law and Article 18 specifically states that “Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.
Not only are the Member States bound to follow all regulations and directives, but they are also expected to make domestic provisions for implementation. Failure to do so will not exonerate the offending Member State and the rights of individuals will be protected by reference to the Community laws. With this in mind, together with the law discussed in the preceding passages.
O’Reilly v Mackman is also credited with extending and qualifying the general rules and ambit of judicial review. Those general principles ensure that decision-making powers are exercised fairly and reasonably. Moreover, the decision in O’Reilly maintains that judicial review exists to ensure that those decisions are exercised on a legally correct basis.
When a mortgage is involved, the matter is not so simply disposed of since the initial deposit does not usually determine the real value of the property. However, Lord Dillion said that the emphasis in relation to the law of trusts has been on the sums contributed by each person for the purchase price of the property.
This legislation aimed at alleviating workplace injuries and illnesses. The legislation further aimed at paving way for voluntary safety initiatives deemed essential in making workplaces safer. By exempting businesses from fines on seeking advice about safety hazards from consultants. The legislation further sought to grant benefits to small businesses for them to recover from money.
In British law, as in most other judicial systems, a tort is considered a civil wrong as distinguished from a criminal wrong, such that the tort law is enforced not by police but by one citizen against another through a civil action. Only in rare cases is tort tried in front of a judge, such as when the complaint involves libel or defamation.
By analyzing the substance of the option to maintain an accused person's 'right to silence' would mean that it will prevent any examination or cross-examination of that person's position, hence it could be deduced that the decision of counsel as to what evidence will be called is a fundamental tactic in any case in the adversarial system.
It is obvious that Section 3 of the Human Rights was intended to permit the preservation of domestic precedents that might compromise the provisions contained in Article 6.2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. For obvious reasons, it is impractical to permit a strict interpretation of Article 6.
The poor law remains in the social history of British History for the past 300 years or so. The role of the British Government had been in its monopoly in history. Unlike other countries, where welfare for the citizens was supported by a combined effort of the voluntary and mutual provision rather by the Government, which acted only later.
While ensuring the implementation of the due process model, CPS faces some criticism also. There is a criticism that the crown prosecutors depend too heavily on police evidence, without reviewing cases independently, (FN 11) but there are suggestions that crown prosecutors merely endorse the sometimes rather ‘subjective’ exercise of discretion.
Women, in general, were upset that the erstwhile polished and accomplished men either refused or could not discern the difference between general banter and sexual harassment. Moreover, African American women were left to suffer an affront to their dignity, as if their gender status was less important because of their race.
In view of all the above factors, it appears that Ruth has a good case to approach the Tribunal on a case of indirect sex discrimination and harassment. Therefore, she may submit a grievance letter and the Council must objectively justify its decision with some solid proof. It is perhaps advisable for the Council to try and resolve the matter with Ruth instead.
The rule of law is missing and this is one aspect that needs to be taken care of since it seems like a law of the jungle at the present moment. Anybody can go out there and kill anyone. This does not happen in a civilized society and surely this is something that can surely come under the rightful tenets of human rights and its related perspectives.
For example, if A pointed a gun at B, with every intent to shoot and kill him/her but failed because the barrel of the gun was empty, should this not figure into the determination of liability/ Certainly, it was impossible for A to accomplish the desired outcome of his crime but, only because, unknown to him, there were no bullets in the gun.
Most arguments that allege inadequate protection of civil rights in the Charter raise the red flag of violation of rights of the aboriginals and the other minorities. But it may also be argued that while there could be individual aberrations of justice, this does not support the contention that the Charter is flawed in its entirety.
Thus, whenever the state adopts a policy, it can always wash its hands from any undesirable effects and events that stemmed from the policy. It can always say that the policy was excellent but the execution and operation were defective. This is like saying that the administration cannot be blamed by the public because it was not them that cause failure.
In the present case, Vito has clearly and unambiguously shown that he intended his son to have the property and also expressly declare himself trustee. Therefore, there is virtually no ambiguity that Vito intended the penthouse to be held in trust for Michael and declared himself as the trustee for the same.
Lay magistrates also appear to be somewhat more gullible as compared to their more experienced and legally qualified colleagues who are regular magistrates, because they tend to believe the police readily, thereby creating a prosecution bias which is not helpful in achieving true justice for the defendants in some cases.
The name itself, the PATRIOT Act is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The label for this law was cleverly designed and packaged to enlist broad support from a nation is generally vulnerable to PATRIOTic propaganda but even more so at the time that it was so swiftly enacted.
The common-law concept of set-off is a right, not the lien. The roots of both these concepts lie in Equity. Both primarily aim at ensuring that the claims of both the parties to a dispute are settled. Both legal and equitable liens and set-offs, in their true sense, arise by the operation of law or equity.
‘The trustees shall apply the net income of the fund in making at their absolute discretion grants to or for the benefit of any of the officers and employees or ex-officers or ex-employees of the company or to any relatives or dependents of any such persons in such amounts at such times and on such condition (if any) as they think fit.’ (McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424)
Making a career choice or a wish to make a geographical move may break up a marriage. If personal fulfillment outweighs the trust that the partner has invested in the relationship, the jilted spouse will be left. They have come into the institution of marriage with uncertainty and leave it with the certainty of mistrust.
The author states that each of the claimants will have to establish that Whacky Builders Ltd. is vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees if they hope to be compensated by the company. In any case, they can sue the individual workmen in their personal capacity or jointly with Whacky Builders Ltd.
7 pages (1750 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
In the law of tort, in order for the aggrieved party to claim damages under this law, the duty of care must be established between the parties. There must be a clear connection between the parties that the act or the omission of the other party will have some grave consequences on the other. Accordingly, where there is no duty of care, and then there is no right to claim.
The author states that the conveyance to Simon assigned the benefit of all covenants to him. Last year, John sold Plot B to Paul and Paul covenanted to indemnify John for any breaches of covenants. Subsequently, Paul neglected the dividing wall claiming that he was not responsible for its upkeep.
The author states that while retributive justice focuses on the offense and on blame for the past and aims to punish the offender, rehabilitation focuses on the offender and on changing his future behavior and aims to treat the offender. In terms of the offender, retribution aims to hurt and rehabilitation to help.
The above initiatives of the British Government are really helpful towards the development of the local housing markets and the only issue that should be examined is their application in the particular areas of England taking into account the character and the level of development of each region.
The final case that has to be considered is Osman which took the law of negligence to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in respect to the duty of care and the immunity of police officers from liability under Hill. The ECtHR found that the immunity was in violation of Article 6(1), the right to a fair hearing.
The court found that the council was liable anyway. Lord Hoffman went on to opine that children often get up to mischief and as such the council should have reasonably foreseen that some sort of accident would occur. (Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council (2000) 1 WLR 1082.)
Substantive law is the written law that governs rights and obligations of the people subjected to it, this means that this criminal law is guided by set law and regulations for prosecuting criminals and also has written rights of the people. It also defines the legal relationship of people with others and also between them and the state.
The Australian Administrative Tribunal was set up under the AAT Act 1975 (Cth) and this enabled the function of review to be centralized in a single federal body, for the purpose of reviewing decisions independently, thus providing for a uniform standard to be applicable in all jurisdictions. This enables aggrieved individuals to challenge Government decisions.
It is not the turf of one particular class, of the poor in our society. In fact, we are now contending with white-collar crimes. Therefore, what is it in the lower class that our images of this sector of our society are muggers and outlaws? Nothing but image! What we have failed to address is the truth the lower class is more susceptible in committing crimes.
Today the world is moving in a fast track, where there have become rigid places to carry and share the emotions of each other. Consoling is considered only for those who live up to their wealth. The sense of belief has come under the stiff arms of human beings. Chances of receiving help from the one who lives with you are becoming meagre.