Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
An easement is a right that one property owner has over the land of another. Easements came into use as a method to allow landowners to sell parts of their land in a way that would be attractive to potential buyers: If X sells a parcel of land to Y, and Y's land has no direct access to the highway, how can Y enforce a right of access to his land?
The application of the provisions contained in the rules under Section 18 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 can be unpredictable. As previously stated the insertion of presumed intentions can be unhelpful and perhaps detrimental to both a buyer and a seller in the event one party becomes insolvent or the property is damaged in transit.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
The author of the paper states that in the case of First Energy (UK) Ltd v Hungarian Bank International Ltd1 the Court of Appeal held that the law of the contract between two commercial parties would be based upon the reasonable expectations of honest businessmen being protected. Seats R Us had agreed to perform the service.
The contentions are that prison is not being used as a last resort to deter criminal behaviour, housing prisoners is expensive, doesn’t deter crime and is cruel and inhumane. Despite the use of statistics to confirm this contention, imprisonment has experienced a growing attraction as a political response to crime, not just in Britain.
Inter Alia, also expressed her doubts regarding the competency and bona fides of the decisions taken by the ECJ. Her contention was that the ECJ pursues its single-minded objective of implementing a unitary European state without any respite or consideration for the interests of the member states.
The conclusion that can be reached from the above is that the test of medical negligence started in the Bolam case is evolving and adapting to the requirements of society today. The initial test was based on judging the standard of care on the basis of the ordinary professional man. Bolitho changed this stance by the use of a logical analysis of the care given.
If it is established that a duty of care is owed by each of the defendants, the plaintiffs are also required to prove that there was a breach of that duty of care. A duty of care can exist at both common and statutory law.
The concept of punitive damages is unknown to the law of contract therefore actual damages are assessed. Ready To Ski’s claim for loss of business is an actual loss and will be assessed by reference to evidence supporting the pattern of income offset by the actual income accrued during the period for which the contract was delayed.
The feminist critique of existing notions of jurisprudence is that theories of individuality are grounded in the male experience. Domestic violence, mostly of women, is thus generally underreported, but current estimates peg it at 16% of all violent crime occurring within the U.K. and the phenomenon has now extended to men as well.
The author states that the major issue that arises is the question of Western Asterix which is a part of the newly constituted independent state of Asterix. This part of Asterixia refuses to accept the administrative authority of the State of Asterixia and civil conflict ha broken out as a result.
It is only the ECJ that has the power to declare an Act that has been set out under the EC Treaty invalid. In those aspects where the ECJ has made a preliminary ruling on a matter of community law, such a ruling will be binding upon the national courts and in future cases, such rulings may be relied upon as established precedents for national courts to follow.
The author states that the mirror principle implies that the registry of records should accurately reflect all the relevant particulars of title, although overriding interests are exceptions to the mirror principle. The curtain principle refers to trusts which are not reflected in the particulars of the title so as to facilitate the smooth conveyance.
Almost in every country, the law is taught in different subjects/topics, like in England, the knowledge of the law is provided in almost seven different subjects. All laws have the same approach and legal system and same issues around the world, although different names are used to elaborate laws.
The doctrine refers to the fact that within the hierarchical structure of the English courts, a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court below. The English Legal System works on an authoritative hierarchical structure, and functions with the help of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
However, this rule has been amended over the years by the Courts since it has been found to be inequitable in certain cases, especially when contracts are frustrated or rendered impossible through circumstances other than a default by either party. The introduction of the Human Rights Act which mandates the precedence of individual rights.
The author states that the separation of ownership and control describes the internal governance structure of corporations by which a large degree of distance or separation has emerged over time between the shareholders of the corporation (ownership) and the directors and senior managers of the corporation (control).
In conclusion, the welfare and protection of social minorities cannot be adequately examined and secured in isolation from their relationship with the larger society because the larger societies wherein these minority groups are situated not only determine the efficacy of minority rights legislation, they are also at risk should such mechanisms fail.
America’s war against recreational drugs is an example of good intentions gone terribly wrong. While this country squanders over $50 billion dollars annually on the efforts to stop illegal drugs, trafficking, and use continue. It has been said that trying to stop drugs is like trying to stop the rain. Over half of the prisoners in jail are there for drug ‘crimes.’
The author accentuates: My research looked at the relationships of the parties concerned to analyze what relationships existed at the time of making the contract and what relationships continued to exist after the assignment of the lease and the assignment of the reversion. I explained the privity of contract and estate.
The author states that employees must be allowed a hearing and the right to appeal the decision to dismiss them. In the case of Sarah, she, therefore, has good grounds to file an unfair dismissal suit because she has not been provided the three-step dispute resolution procedure. In the case of Simon however, he was provided the hearing.
The “EEC Treaty.....was conceived as an international agreement, and only later came to be viewed as a constitutional document.” However, as pointed out by D. Anderson, the judicial activism of the European Court of Justice has “appoints the European Court as meeting place between the legal order of the Community and those of its member states.”
In those areas where the community shares power with the member States, the principle of subsidiarity operates to require that Community law should operate only when the desired goal can be achieved with better efficiency by the Community.
The author states that the court must have sufficient superiority to bind itself on lower courts and the ruling must contain a ratio decidendi or decided on law, not fact. Although the ratio decidendi may be the same in two cases, the facts may differ causing different rulings. Although the judiciary has departed from this tendency, departures are rare.
Generally speaking, an offer must contain a definitive promise providing the other party with an unambiguous option to accept or decline the offer. Consideration is also an essential element of contract creation and enforceability. Once offer and acceptance are found to exist, the courts will then look to determine whether or not there is a consideration.
16 pages (4000 words)
, Download 2
, Research Proposal
Free
Mark Twain sued publisher Belford, Clarke and Co for the unauthorized use of his nom de plume to publish a collection of stories. In a satirical speech to the Congress which highlighted the need to address the moral rights of the author, he pointed out how “they turn around and do what they can to discourage it
Under the Indian penal system, foreigners, political prisoners, and high-caste criminals are treated better than the rest of the prisoners. In Indian prisons like in many other prisons of the countries with the same level of well-being torture, other types of physical and sexual abuse, as well as a high level of suicides are a common practice /India Penal System, 1994.
The idea behind this is to ensure that inventors get the advantage of creation by having the exclusive right of commercial exploitation of his investments while at least forcing them to disclose process-oriented discussions. Lord Oliver said in Asahi ‘ the underlying purpose of the Patent system is the encouragement for improvement and innovation
This scenario presents the question of whether the provisions of the Human Rights Act of 1998 can be invoked by Estelle and Gary to challenge the requirement of the Blueberry District Council that the convention proposed by the Children of the Forrest (COTC) group should not involve the use of alcohol or dancing, especially since these activities are vital to the core beliefs of the organization.
The author states that from a technical viewpoint, the term ‘Washington Consensus’ is a name given to the policies which were suggested by Washington based institutes to the Latin American countries in order to bring up and improve their economies. The term was originally created by Williamson.
The author states that the person, called a trustee, is supposed to hold the property in trust for others, or for a particular purpose or purposes. The trustees have legal ownership, whereas the beneficiaries have equitable ownership. Trusts may be of various kinds, but the broadest division may be said to be that of a fixed trust and discretionary trust.
Interruption is relevant in the case of forced caesareans where the purported mental impairment of the patient’s decision-making ability has often attributed to being adequate justification to perform reproductive procedures against her consent. The woman’s mental impairment is the basis upon which she is held liable under the law.
In its common context, a blasphemy can mean different things to different individuals and a discussion of blasphemy is likely to unleash many a passionate feeling. This is because blasphemy is about showing the irreverence to the sacred and this sacred is likely to be the very glue that binds a society
The author states that identifies several factors that can create difficulties in interpretation of statutes, such as for example, the use of ambiguous words or unforeseen developments or in some cases where a drafting error may cause literal interpretation of the statute to produce an absurd result.
Chief Justice Rehnquist also explains that the presidential power to hire and fire employees of the executive branch of government at his sole discretion remained indeterminate until 1953 when in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v the United States; the court held that President Franklin Roosevelt had the power to expel William Humphrey, who was the Federal Trade Commissioner.
Implicit in this provision is a suggestion of the Union’s superiority and this obviously deviates from the objective of unity as encompassed in the Laeken Declaration. The word ‘loyalty’ implies that the Union is superior to the Member States which will empower the Union by virtue of ratification of the EU Constitution.
Many people drink in moderation to control their drinking problems, but the counter-argument says it is addictive. Not only are they destroying their livers, but they are also taking a risk of getting in trouble with the law. There are a lot of issues that come up about drinking, but maybe these people can not stop one day to the next. It does not make them bad people if they are trying to quit by drinking in moderation.
It is quite essential to note that the strict interpretation of contractual obligations between parties and the doctrine of Privity of contract, coupled with the lack of provision under common law for the separation of legal and beneficial interests have been directly responsible for the evolution of trusts.
The decision which denied Z Co-registration as a government supplier of goods and services was obviously not only contrary to EC competition policies but was made taking into account facts which ought not to have been considered. Z Co’s excessive wages has no relevance to its ability to supply goods and services.
The developed world always has a positive outlook towards protecting intellectual property for a long time back. On one hand, where the safeguard of IP rights brings benefits like enhancing innovative culture, profitability, and financial up-gradation for mostly the developed countries it also accompanies drawbacks for the less developed countries.
The author states that he had to inform himself of the right way of formulating such demand letters. He read similar cases that his principal had him revise. He reviewed the structure and format in order to create his own demand letters. He gathered all the necessary information on detailing the plaintiff´s injuries.
In the trial of Bruno Hauptmann for the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby, there were several unresolved questions which remained unaddressed8 however the advocacy skills of the prosecution in manipulating the witnesses and appealing to the emotions of the jury by focusing on the horrors of a little child’s death resulted in a conviction.
The major characteristics of the bureaucracy will be presented and discussed in order to provide a good background for the post-bureaucratic organization. The second part will be a discussion of the features of the post-bureaucratic organization and the final part will discuss the challenges and pressures that managers face.
Section 3 of the Wills Act of 1837 states that, “ . . . it shall be lawful for every person to devise, bequeath, or dispose of, by his will executed in the manner hereinafter required, all real estate and all personal estate which shall be entitled to, either at law or in equity, at the time of his death, and which, if not so devised, bequeathed, and disposed of, would devolve . . .”
The author states that the oral dispositions that Donna has made prior to her death appear to be somewhat different because she has expressed oral intent to transfer her Burberry shares to her brother and sister and rights to her autobiography to her friend Charlie, while the Porsche car is to go to her friend Josh.
The author specifically directs his discussion to the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) which has heard several cases that have progressively limited the ability of individual countries to restrict the establishment of companies, agencies, branches, and subsidiaries in other European countries.
8 pages (2000 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
Free
In the French court system, there are three degrees of organization and they are the following: 1st degree which hears the case when it is first brought up, 2nd degree which hears appeals against the decisions of the first degree, 3rd degree which hears appeals against the interpretation of the law by the second degree courts.
Judges have at their disposal two tools by which they can control the development of the law. They are the doctrine of stare decisis or case law precedents and statutory interpretations. Although an Act of Parliament, courts are required to interpret statutes. Precedents originate from the courts but Parliament can legislate against them.
The main offenses for which the park could be held liable are the torts of negligence and nuisance as well as for intentional and statutory torts. The traffic and noise from the rides are forms of nuisance, whereas the water seepage from the water ride and the overflow of garbage from the park amount to acts of negligence.
Despite the criticism that has been levied on the 2006 NSS document, what this document represents is an attempt by a United States administration to provide a grand strategy for global uplift and advancement. Although the vision is worth striving for, success will depend on the sincere cooperation of a very large number of foreign actors who must also be willing to contribute towards the costs associated with this grand strategy.