Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
Iggins Ltd has entered into contracts with all of the 32 players. The 28 players have fulfilled the terms of their contract by arriving in Birmingham and Iggins Ltd will be expected to fulfill its side of the contract as well since there are certain obligations that arise out of a contract1. In general English, Courts have tended to favor the enforcement of contracts.
The author states that the reason for the rule is that trust gives rise to a requirement and so, consequently, there must be a recipient to whom the duties of a trustee are owed. Conversely, the beneficiaries have a correlative right to render the trustee answerable for his actions and, if necessary, compel the performance of his obligations.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Tracing at common law enables the defendant to be identified as the recipient of the plaintiff's money and the measure of his liability to be determined by the amount of the plaintiff's money he is shown to have received. The traditional learning is that money can be followed at common law into and out of a bank account, but only if it has not been mixed with other money in the account, whereas equity is free from that limitation.
One of the aspects that must be considered is the fact that according to Section 7 of the Vehicular Access across Common and other Land (Wales) regulations, Alison would have had to submit an application for the use of the easement and receive a signed note of no objection from the owners. Since Alison has no such document.
A person (A) commits an offence if: He intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken.
There are several other significant developments that arise under the New Act, notably the facility of e-conveyancing, the legalizing of adverse possession, incorporating boundary principles into statutes and introducing compulsory registration of all land. This is likely to bring about some far-reaching changes into the manner in which land is conveyed.
Many of the exceptions still overlap, and more importantly, hearsay broadly is still excluded. The process of determining the admissibility of the “hearsay” evidence still depends in important respects on judicial discretion that is more often than not, not made suitable for application by lay magistrates and is often exercised inconsistently in the Crown Court.
The Charities Act has provided the necessary rules for the protection related with all areas of such kind of activity (Third Sector, December 7, 2005), like the creation of fundraising contract (regarding all its areas, from the evaluation of risk, the specifications, the standards, and the payment measures’.
The conditions of the entrance and the living of immigrants in a state have been under significant consideration from all the developed countries. In this context, the presence of immigrants has been often related to a series of problems caused by local societies (or the whole nations).
While the risks involved with work can never be truly eliminated, making a suitable and sufficient risk assessment would certainly minimize those risks. The sufficiency of the risk assessment has to do with non-quantifiable risks while suitability concerns itself with risks that are particular to the job at hand.
The investor should be more effectively protected through the provision of one or more of the following rights [13]: a) receive dividends on pro-rata terms, b) vote for directors, c) participate in shareholders’ meetings, d) subscribe to new share issues on same terms as inside, e) sue directors or controlling owners for suspected expropriation.
Article 6 of the Human Rights Act of 1998, which came into force in 2000 in the U.K, establishes the right of every individual to a fair trial, in order to ensure that an individual’s civil liberties are protected and that every person who is charged with a criminal offense, in particular, shall be presumed innocent unless proved guilty according to law.
The Nazi trials at Nuremberg offer the best example of the clash between natural law and the law of the State as propagated by Hart and other Positivists. These trials necessarily invoked a moral dimension which the Prosecution lawyers seized upon. From the perspective of the defendants, their actions were well supported by the tenets of legal positivism.
In the event where conflict arises and the Commission refused to grant the request of the person or institution, a right of appeal to the "court of the first instance" for appeals against certain decisions of the new Charity Commission may be made. Such Charity Appeal Tribunal as constituted by the Bill should be an independent and impartial tribunal, established by law.
The public policy being considered then was an overriding control on reasonability at large and the proper circumscription of the relations between the plaintiff or his property and the defendant or his property as well as the circumscription of liability through the proper imposition of a duty of care.
The Århus Convention established the rights of the public with regard to the environment. Public authorities are to play a factor by permitting these rights to become effective. The Convention provides that citizens are entitled to obtain environmental information within one month of the request and without having to say why they require it.
The author states that the fact that Jamie has used a spear instead of a gun is also indicative of malice aforethought and that she set out to deliberately kill the deer through the use of an instrument that was expressly forbidden under the Act, with the intent to carry out a murder and escape the liability for it by using an alternative weapon.
In the event of the emergence of a common European State, this raises the prospect of the European Parliament assuming many of the functions that are now carried out by the member states and together with this legislative function, the concept of assumption of Parliamentary sovereignty is also another aspect that must be considered.
The new nonstatutory tariff scheme calculated compensation on a flat rate basis according to the category of injury under common law rather than compensation taking into account factors such as special damages and individual circumstances of a particular case. (4) The first issue was to determine the effect of subsection 171.
Landowners have more convenient access and an unimpeachable stake to their property. Buyers know more about their purchase in advance of a contract. Tenants have an open book to prices charged to others in the same general location. The open-book, efficient, streamlined title service and property definitions make the system more trustworthy.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts 197 U.S. 11 (1905) is the court case that concerned public health issues. The basis of the argument was the refusal of Jacobson to be vaccinated against smallpox. The law chap. 75, 137 held that Massachusetts cities can require or enforce the residents to be vaccinated for public health or safety.
In order for any contractual obligations to existing between two parties, there must be a valid offer from an offerer and a valid acceptance from the person who accepts the offer. Since Olive has advertised her car in the “For Sale” column she would be the offerer and what must be considered is whether her ad constitutes a valid offer in contractual terms.
Three important developments in the framework of law, policy and practice will shape the use of prisons and alternatives to prisons in the future. “First, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 contains measures such as Custody Minus, Custody Plus and Intermittent Custody, which if used properly could provide alternative options for courts”.
Violent crime among dealers is historically more attributable to drug prohibition than it is among users. “When alcohol was an illicit drug, alcohol dealers settled their differences with firearms, just as cocaine dealers do today. But two liquor store owners are now no more likely to shoot one another than are two taxi drivers.
In the case of Jackson and Others, v HMAG the validity of the Hunting Act of 2004 was challenged on the grounds that it was based upon the Parliament Act of 1949, which in turn could not be construed to be an act legally implemented by the Parliament and was therefore invalid since it did not possess the necessary Parliamentary mandate.
The question that arises, in this case, – is whether Germany’s tax valid and sustainable under Community law that needs to allow for the free movement of goods within the European Union. It may be noted that case law has established that in all such matters which were once in the province of national law, it is now EC law that will pre-empt national laws.
According to another view, the Statute Law has its routes to the Magna Carta (1225 in the reign of Henry III), and a large volume is now added every year’ (Geldart, 1995, 2). However, Common Law still remains the basic ‘tool’ for the formulation of the judicial view. In this context, it is stated that ‘no statute, yet prescribes in general terms".
In general, Hart would conclude that Arthur acted in what he believed a moral fashion by breaking a law while the judge, jury and executioner acted immorally by upholding that law. At least, that is the case if Arthur’s aim of civil disobedience was to change the law instead of just trying to circumvent it.
The training that Brooker has will be valid only incomparable employment, which is likely to be available only with his competitors. Since the nature of his job is not a confidential one, such strict requirements as laid out by the restrictive Covenant may well be deemed to be too restrictive by the Courts.
The Land Registration Act of 2002 provides the facility for squatters to claim title to land that they may have acquired adversely. When modern statutory provisions such as these exist in the law, the Prescription Act of 1932 which is primarily focused upon rights of public and private way in the matter of easements and appurtenances appears to be redundant.
11 pages (2957 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
Jim did not inspect the TV before signing the delivery slip. As he was closing the door and turn he tripped over his cat. Hurting himself, he went to the hospital and was admitted for a three month period. Upon returning home, Jim unpacked TV2 and when he attempted to turn on TV2 he found that it did not work.
The only patients who can be so classified are patients who have been involved at some stage in proceedings before the criminal courts. In the case of the applicants Anderson and Reid, the High Court made an order under Section 60 of the 1960 Act, the equivalent of Section 59 of the 1995 Act, subjecting them to special restrictions relating to their detention.
Michel, a Frenchman, has been charged with the armed robbery of a post office in Dover. In a witness statement, the postmaster says that the robber had a distinctive French accent. At an identification parade (at which the postmaster is unable to visually identify Michel), Michel is asked to say: ‘Put your hands up’.
The remedy that would be available to beryl would be a breach of contract on the basis of promissory estoppel. A unilateral contract is a promise for a particular act. Therefore if that promise is breached, Beryl can claim recoveries for her wasted expenditure and time in fulfilling the terms of the offer and the loss of expectation of receiving the sum of J50 in cash.
The author states that girls deprived of contact with their fathers grow up depressed and prone to mental problems*1. Traditional familial relationships are giving way to unmarried heterosexual relationships and civil partnerships of homosexual couples. There has been a steep rise in the percentage of families.
10 pages (2500 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
Free
The criminal justice system in the UK is not working. According to the British Crime Survey report for the last quarter of 2003, the percentage of violent crimes reduced by 5 percent during the year 2003 compared to the previous year but the percentage change between October to December of 2003 compared to a year earlier reflected a jump of 11%.
While examining the rights of the subtenants, I decided to examine case law that had invoked the provisions of Section 146 of LPA. Accordingly, I searched for “S.146 LPA+ case law” and was able to find several cases listed, including Rugby School Governors v Tannahill, Scala House, and District property v Forbes, Hyman v Rose and Savva v Hussain.
The existence of a Directive gives individuals the right to contest national legislation through the Direct Effect. Individual rights specified in this Directive state that the substances in question are not noxious and EU law is geared towards the promotion of free trade, as a result of which a bar on imports would constitute a violation of the EU Directive.
In the UK, the issue of privacy was raised in the case of Campbell v MGN Limited and the House of Lords held that the law imposes a duty of confidence whenever a person receives information that he knows is private and that the essence of a tort of privacy would lie in misuse of such confidential information.
The author states that the agency of necessity will have to play the role of doing what is prescribed to be done, as like a good father of a family. The rules relating to the agency of necessity are called from so many disparate sources that it has proved consistently impossible to forge the law into one coherent body of doctrine.
The range of damages being awarded and actions that can be brought under contract have expanded through the tort of negligence and duty of care to include tortious claims within the scope of contractual obligations, especially where a breach of contract may be shown to have been an unlawful act that was calculated to do harm to a Plaintiff.
The center of Hart’s argument is the “Harm Principle” extrapolated from John Mill’s composition 100 years earlier. “..That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (Mill, 1885). Devlin, surprisingly, agreed with this premise.
Most of the covenants are coached in general terms. Furthermore, not all countries in the world are signatories to the UN instruments protecting women. There are countries that are signatories to the instruments who signed with reservations on some provisions thereof, making their support to the instrument conditional.
13 pages (3434 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
The only possible reason that would appear to justify the reasoning of the Courts would be if the matter was considered from a revenue perspective. The Courts do not approve of tax evaders and therefore, they render decisions in individual cases such that the purpose of tax evasion through the medium of trusts is deflected.
The treaty is subject to the interpretation of the contending parties. The law will not settle the issues if the ECJ will not uphold it. Jurisdiction is defined as the authority to hear and decide a case. Controversies created by different interpretations could not be left hanging in the air. The parties want a definitive interpretation of the state of law.
The normal and the accepted view under the English Law is that the buyer has the right to reject the goods and demand a refund, whenever his specifications are not met with the amendments, as they stand it has been found that a buyer does not immediately look for a refund, instead of exhaust his options of repair and replacement.
6 pages (1609 words)
, Download 1
, Literature review
Free
Every country and its system of government have its own reasons for flourishing, which cannot be duplicated. Politics systems are not laboratory experiments, which can be replicated or copied from one country to another country overnight. Had that been the case, Iraq would have become a democratic country overnight.
The ECJ has increasingly been moving into areas that are beyond the scope of its jurisdiction and has been influencing the course of national law through the imposition of European law. In some cases, the decisions that have been spelled out by the European Court of Justice have entailed a great deal of inconvenience and problems of implementation for the Member States.
11 pages (3141 words)
, Download 1
, Research Proposal
Free
Paragraph 12.13 of Code C specifically points to "written statements made under caution" and a written statement under caution should normally be taken only at the express wish of a suspect. The police may ask the suspect if he wants to make a written statement but not to compel him to do so. These statements should only be made in person and not in correspondence.
The author states that the availability of health care was mostly reserved for the rich. Even then, services were often concentrated in certain areas, inadequate in others or nonexistent in many rural and/or poor localities. Societal demands began to equate quality health care with an advanced culture.