Recently Uploaded

Reviewing Decisions in a Court - Article Example

Comments (0)
This essay discusses reviewing decisions in a court. The essay focuses on a determination as to whether or not a party has the standing to bring an action for review, a distinction is made between whether public rights or private rights are involved.   …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Reviewing Decisions in a Court"

Download file to see previous pages Administrative Review Tribunals do not have the power to review every administrative decision2. Where a tribunal is asked to review a decision on merits, it can intervene only in instances where specifically provided for by statute.3 Moreover the Tribunal must also have the necessary jurisdiction conferred on it.
But there is much wider scope provided for a merits review, as compared to a judicial review since the former involves a reconsideration of the entire decision-making process and the decision itself to examine whether it is the correct decision, so that a new decision may be the result of a merits review. The Tribunal has the power for a wide range of administrative actions, including suspending or revoking certificates, issuing or refusing licenses, imposing conditions, making declarations or refusing to do so5, and this also encompasses “doing or refusing to do any act or thing.” While the decisions of tribunals are not enforceable, they do have the persuasive force of the original decision maker and do not infringe upon the doctrine of separation of powers.
The nature of a tribunal’s decision is final and operative, however, they cannot make original decisions, only substitute or review on decisions actually made by a decision maker.9 The Tribunal has the power to review whether a decision was the “correct and preferable one on the material before it.”10 Therefore while the Tribunal does not have the power to make new decisions on matters not already decided by an administrative decision maker, it is not obliged to make decisions in accordance with the administrative policy. It is allowed some leeway in reviewing the decision, even departing from Government policy, unless some specific statutory provision requires adherence to administrative policy or curtails the discretionary power of the tribunal in making decisions. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Reviewing Decisions in a Court

Supreme Court Decisions

...? Supreme Court Decisions of the of the Concerned June 15, Supreme Court Decisions The Fourth Amendment and ‘Unreasonable Search’ The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States stands to be a part of the Bill of Rights. It aims at protecting the citizens of America against unreasonable search and seizures. The Objective of the Fourth Amendment was to curb the misuse of ‘writ of assistance’ in the American Revolution that amounted to a type of general search warrant (Dripps, 2007). As per the Fourth Amendment, a ‘reasonable search’ is one that is pursuant to a judicially sanctioned warrant and is supported by a probable cause (Dripps, 2007). That is as per...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court Decisions

...the civil procedure under section 581 of the law in California. This petition was unsuccessful since the court ruled out, because it did not represent the views of the public but just an individual. Despite this ruling, the court, however, did not have much hearing by the public. The second case was to allow the media to show high profile Supreme Court cases in the U.S.A. The judges allowed the coverage to be aired in the whole nation, to make the work of the highest-level court in land perform its duties. The major objective of the judiciary is to safe guard the community from incompetent politics and other social enemies (Vining &Teena 718). Works cited Hale, et al....
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Soicial Issues and Warren Court Decisions

... of the “Exclusionary Rule” which makes evidence illegally obtained to be inadmissible in court under certain circumstances. The Fourth Amendment’s principles were upheld by this ruling. In summary, the above cases were championing the civil rights of individuals. By observing the Warren court decisions and precedents, it is evident that it was an activist and liberal court that was dedicated to protecting and extending rights of the American citizens. Work Cited How did the Warren Court use judicial review to protect the rights of citizens. Web. May. 2012. ... Social Issues and Warren Court Decisions Introduction The United s of America is a constitutional democracy designed to address the desires of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

...Decisions, Decisions, Decisions When I proposed buying a fleet of Volvo's for the Electric Company, my supervisor greeted the proposal with an emotionally charged response. He was very opposed to Volvo and he was firm in his convictions. There was no doubt he believed in his point of view. However, his process for reaching his decision was flawed by fallacy. The available heuristic he used led him to believe that all Volvos were junk by the anecdotal fallacy (The Fallacy Files 2007). His brother in law possibly complained vividly and often about the quality of the car and that information stood out in my supervisor's mind. No other information on the Volvo was likely to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court Trilogy Decisions in 1960

...carefully read and thoroughly analyzed the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in these cases. He also researched and examined the opinions and findings of legal personalities and writers after these cases were decided. Aside from the trilogy cases, the researcher also made use of one additional case and six commentaries and/or researches, all were taken from reputable sources in the Internet. Review of Related Literature Rainseberger enumerated the common law treatment of voluntary remedies: "Traditionally, in the United States, the courts have looked with disfavor at efforts of private citizens to use voluntary methods to resolve contractual disputes. Many states...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Reviewing Progress

...Reviewing Progress PART A Summarise what changes you have made to the way in which you learned and the reasons why you made these changes Studying business is a task which enables a person to be well-equipped with the corporate world in which he will enter right after he is through with his studies. And therefore, business studies should also make a person learn practically how to deal with different situations and scenarios that he will face when he joins the fiercely competitive race of doing something and making a mark in the business world. Learning is a continuous process and does not stop even after a person finishes his education. A very important skill that has been developed during developing the skills...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Peer Reviewing

...PEER REVIEWING Overall, this paper about the basic principles three different types of technical analysis, and response given to the ment, is written well. The assignment question requires the writer to outline the basic principles used by technical analysts in their assessment of investment, discuss three different types of charts used by them in their decision making, and provide with a suitable response to the given statement. The response is well laid out in three separate parts, each section fulfilling the assignment requirement appropriately. The paper aims to give a direct response to the questions and for the most part covers the basic needs. However, it would have been more effective with certain addition to, and changes... the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Illustrated Great Decisions of the Supreme Court

...rather than a religious critique (or religious based) (Idea center). In the legal hearing which was heard in 1987 and well known as Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) which bared teaching of creation science in public schools. It was a decision which was taken by the Supreme Courts of United States. The creation sciences have been stated as controversial and since the breach of state and church phenomenon could not be afforded (Kurland, 1988). The creation science is provocative for the societies where people of different religions reside or where people have strong affection with their religions (Mauro, 2006). It has been a broad validation statement of the underlying regulation based upon ban of creation...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Recent Supreme Court decisions 2014

... in handling of exceptional cases hence they were given discretion to handle those cases. The exceptional case reviewed by the Federal Circuit courts in examination of de novo and declined the ruling of the district court. Therefore, the Supreme Court decision in the case reversed the district court’s requirement that the petitioner pay attorney’s patent fees. Works Cited Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int’l, Inc., 393 F. 3d 1378 Highmark Inc. V. Allcare Health Management, Inc PAROLINE V. UNITED STATES Et Al. PRADO NAVARETTE et al. v. CALIFORNIA Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U. S. 552... Recent Supreme Court Decisions PRADO NAVARETTE et al. v. CALIFORNIA Facts: In this case, the California patrol...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Impacts of Supreme Court Decisions

...Impacts of Supreme Court Decisions Introduction This paper aims to explore the supreme court of the United States of America, its functions and how some of its major rulings on some of the petitions impact the current American society. This paper will dwell on the issues of private land being acquired or used by the state and polygamy in the United States which will argue on the issue of religion beliefs and how they are viewed by the constitution of the United States. Arkansas game and fish commission v. United States No. 11-597. Argued October 3, 2012 – decided December 4, 2012 In this case the petitioner, Arkansas game and fish commission owns and manages the Dave Donaldson Black...
2 Pages(500 words)Admission/Application Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Article on topic Reviewing Decisions in a Court for FREE!

Contact Us