Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The domestic courts of the UK have construed this to imply a modification of procedures and systems, in order to comply with the EU order1. This development has been considered by a section of the constitutionalists as being an extraordinary development. However, the courts have treated such evaluations as mere exaggeration.
The author states that it is a distinct entity, which is supported by law. It has great significance in contract law and generates several arguments regarding legal obligations. As such estoppel is a general principle and it plays an important role in law. Moreover, it can be applied to all types of contracts.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
When examining the situation with regard to the holiday it is necessary to examine the conditions under which Simon might be able to bring an action. In order to establish a claim against the company, it is essential to analyze the promises made by the agent in respect of the holiday. This would assist Simon in his claim as he can use the regulation.
Within the Hong Kong system, the defense counsel has many challenges for cause available, and the accused is entitled to five peremptory challenges. As the number of qualifying jurors might be minimal in number, the use of these 5 peremptory challenges is significant as it is easier to obtain an unrepresentative jury.
In ethics, it consists of practical universal judgments which man himself elicits. (source: Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition ). It is based on the principle that ‘ lex jnjusta non est lex’ - ‘law which is not moral is not law at all ’. The term ‘ Jurisprudence’ is derived from the Latin term ‘ juris prudentia’, which means "the study, knowledge, or science of law".
In the case of WR Games, they have not been silent, but have protested the end of the long-standing relationship. It may also be noted that 70% of WRG’s business comes from TGT, therefore the Courts are likely to support WRG’s position about the detrimental effects to WRG from TGT’s cancellation of the contract without adequate notice.
From examining the above it could be argued that the method used by the judge for interpreting statute is very important. If the judge only uses a literal approach then the result might not always be fair or moral. Using the golden rule too liberally could mean that the true purpose of the Act is not achieved.
In cases where equitable or common law principles will clearly apply, the Courts function in accordance with those principles, as also articulated by Bagnall J in Cowcher v Cowcher, which supports Ashburn’s view of the separation of the two streams of law. The conclusion that must be drawn is that there are two separate streams that still apply.
The First Amendment effectively guarantees free speech, freedom of the press and religion. Freedom of the press is an extension to the freedom of speech concept. A free press is essential to the idea of democracy and has been accurately described as the ‘Fourth Estate’ of government. As the three branches of government act to check and balance each other, the press watches over them all.
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that although many except the notion that crime is a social phenomenon rather than an individual phenomenon their perception of this is clouded by the fact that there are very few areas were some form of problems such as litter or graffiti are not present.
Justina is a teacher who gets involved in the school projects and fundraising and thus wins Franks trust and access to sensitive information related to finances which account for 250,000 pounds for the period of fundraising. She misuses the information to transfer funds to Poland and leaves the country to go back to Poland without informing the concerned people.
The American government goes far beyond what is necessary for their desire to protect America. The Patriot Act and more importantly, the Real ID Act are both situations where the government has decided to forgo the liberties it accorded to its people in order to gain increased security for itself.
If Jake had offered these drugs to Robin, then there would have been no manslaughter, because there would be no men's rea, which constitutes the crime. Moreover, Jake was not aware of the fact that Robin would suffer a fatal heart attack if his heart was subjected to sudden stress, which these drugs were capable of causing.
10 pages (2749 words)
, Download 1
, Research Proposal
Free
Technology is required in the service sector and the manufacturing sector. The manufacturing sector could require it to introduce a new product, assess the feasibility and viability of an existing product, or determine why the product has not taken off as envisaged. Technology that has been developed by another firm or by themselves is the intellectual property of that firm.
51 pages (12750 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
As to a study conducted by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister in 2003, there was at least 20.9 mln households in England. Statistics further reveal that 71% were owner-occupied either outright or via a mortgage. Another 12% of occupiers were council tenants, while 6% consisted of tenants tied to leasing arrangements with social landlords.
It is important to know that the Parliament has not defined murder, despite many requests for decades to place the murder on a statutory footing. The Report of the Select Committee of the House of Lords on Murder and Life Imprisonment reiterated the necessity of doing so, in 1989 itself. It is not that the successive Prime Ministers and Law Secretaries did not think about it.
A general view of crime is that it is an offense of any kind against an individual or the state, which is punishable by law. This naturally adds layers to the meaning of crime. An offense per se would have to be at a level that penetrates social consciousness and is against the moral fiber of the society that we have created and that we live in. The perpetrator of the crime is the criminal.
Businesses, hospitals, physicians, homeowners, etc., all find themselves under an umbrella of fear wondering when and if they will be taken to court even though they have not been negligent or complicit in causing harm to anyone. Small businesses are the most vulnerable. They are the most susceptible to frivolous lawsuits.
The primary aim of any criminal justice system is to foster confidence in the democratic process. The appearance of justice is very important to the integrity of criminal justice and it goes to the heart of confidence and trust. The system of jury trials has vested some measure of responsibility for accountability in the average citizen.
At the time of her admission, she has executed an Advance Care Directive, including a Do Not Resuscitate Order, in consultation with her physician. Subsequently, the board of the retirement home has changed its’ policy and made it mandatory for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to be performed on all patients, irrespective of their wishes.
The most likely scenario is that this would not make a difference in this case since it was not a determining factor for the actual loss of goods. If the loss of goods would have been as a direct consequence of the lack of export paperwork then Read it Well Ltd would be liable for the loss of goods due to its administrative incompetence.
With regard to the issue of risk, Article 67(1) of the CISG states that if the contract of sale involves carriage of the goods and the seller is not bound to hand them over at a particular place, the risk passes to the buyer when the goods are handed over to the first carrier for transmission to the buyer in accordance with the contract of sale.
This paper illustrates that although judges had always played a small role in the formation of new laws as their judgments either helped to bring about a sharper definition or to acknowledge a unique set of circumstances, the charter increased the overall awareness of human rights in the equation of determining law and punishment
Proponents of euthanasia also argue that the time of health care professionals, of which there is a perpetual shortage, especially nurses, could be used in a more productive manner such as on patients who are not certain to die. Numerous studies have established that understaffed medical care facilities provide a diminished quality of care to all.
EC Directives are a means by which the European Community seeks to harmonize domestic laws among its member States. Theoretically at least, EC Directives are calculated to afford Community citizens a means of redress in domestic courts in the event they are denied the benefit of rights under EC Directives.
Today, conflicts are no longer addressed extensively through consolidated trade unions, where numerous employees get together and voice a common opinion. The situation has given rise to individualism. Individual employees can voice their grievances openly since the Law has provided for legislations to support their cause.
From this paper, it is clear that obviously, Darling Waters revoked the offer, but in general, an offer cannot be withdrawn or revoked once it has been accepted. In any event in order for the withdrawal of an offer to be effective the withdrawal must be communicated to the offeree. No such communication took place and Bianca found out purely by accident.
As laid out by Lord Wright in the case of Ross T Smyth and Co Ltd v T.D. Bailey Son and Co the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act under Sections 18 and 19 in reference to transference of property from the Seller to the Buyer, discerning the intention of the parties will be dependent upon the individual terms of the contract.
It was felt in this regard that the rights of prisoners for having access to courts need to be protected. Lord Cooke in this Case, observed that certain rights of people have Fundamental rights such as “access to court; access to legal advice; and the right to communicate confidentially with a legal adviser under the seal of legal professional privilege.”
The most important issue in this regard is that the European Act of 2007 interferes with the supremacy of EU legislation, the supremacy of which has been acknowledged through the passage of the Human Rights Act of 1998, incorporating the rights and freedoms embodied in the European Convention of Human Rights into the body of UK law.
Legal rules are generally derived from statutes, such as for example, the Magna Carta of 1215 or the Human Rights Act of 1998. Conventions however comprise those known legal rules which form a part of the body of the Constitution. They are the nonlegal rules of constitutional behavior which bind the constitutional actors.
It is quite essential to state that there have been some instances where damages have been claimed in nuisance, both under private and public nuisance. However such liability is connected to the actual physical interference with a neighboring land owner’s right to peaceful enjoyment of his property.
Tina and Tom will also have added powers of investment and discretion under the Trustee Act of 2002. The letter that Sally has written will, therefore, benefit Ben as one of the beneficiaries of Sally’s estate, entitling him to capital advances from the estate at the discretion of the trustees, Tina and Tim.
Comments made by the House of Lords appear to support the flexibility which operates to produce an exhaustive list of inconsistent rulings. These comments also demonstrate why the courts are no more inclined than Parliament to define the parameters within which to direct the distribution of the child’s best interests.
In reference to the sale of the slave from Brutus, it may be noted that there were two specific terms that were agreed to between the parties on the principle of consensus ad idem. This was one of the basic requirements for a contract, and it was meant to represent a meeting of the minds where each party understood the commitments to be made by each.
Ancillary relief is mainly governed by Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973, together with future substitutions that have occurred. According to Section 25, a divorced spouse can claim ancillary relief based upon the spouse’s income, earning capacity and financial resources as well as on the basis of the financial needs and obligations of each party.
When a mortgage is involved, the matter is not so simply disposed of since the initial deposit does not usually determine the real value of the property. However, Lord Dillion said that the emphasis in relation to the law of trusts has been on the sums contributed by each person for the purchase price of the property.
The facts of the case for discussion strongly imply that AFS had the authority to terminate Barnes’ services if he failed and/or refused to do as they wished. This control, therefore, gave them the requisite control over him. If an employee receives a salary for his services he is more likely to be regarded as an employee under the control test.
The study of policing history is to appreciate where the present policing stand today (i.e. I believe the history of policing offers us а positive perspective and how we have embraced present policing values via interpretations of а past and establishing meanings through the researching of historical documentations left by people of other times and places.)
The internal policies among the member countries, their judicial approach on the issues of human rights, need for change in their policies during trade are well administered in the treaties and the law of world trade organization. As human rights are of prime importance in a nation, it ought to be safeguarded.
Sexual Offences Act 2003 has tried to redefine the role of consent in cases of sexual violation and abolished the Morgan defence, making the excuses of consent as a means to escape liability. The Act has also widened the idea of rape to include oral penetration, dismissing the arguments that restricted the definition of rape to vaginal penetration.
The first recorded execution was that of Captain George Kendall of Virginia in 1608 for being a spy for Spain. In 1612, even minor offenses like stealing grapes and killing chicken attracted the death penalty but reforms started in 1767 when an essay Crimes and Punishment by Cesare Beccaria had a strong impact throughout the world.
Johnny could rely on the case of R. (on the application of Jones) v Environment Agency where the court held that the silence of the Agency over the last 20 years or more concerning the stretch of water used by Jones allowed Jones to have a legitimate expectation to continue to use the area as he had been doing for that time period.
In the case of Miranda, the facts of the case failed to mention how the employer tried to safeguard the health of his or her employee. Unlike in the Pickford case where the employer constantly reminded the employee to take a break for her typing job, there was no showing that the employer of Miranda did the same thing.
There are two competing interests as against the Rowans. They are the mortgage for 50,000 pounds sterling and the further charge for 10,000. Both are required to be discharged from the proceeds of the sale. The nature of the legal rights conferred by both charges compels the discharge in order for the Bentleys to lay claim to any capital.
11 pages (2750 words)
, Download 3
, Literature review
Free
When any human activity repeatedly threatens the common good, the objective is to put it up for closer inspection so that better understanding of its dynamics would help improve the capability of the government to fight and prevent it. Criminality was given the tag “organized crime” when and have common crime is committed by a group of conspiring hoods.
The author of the following paper states that the horrific terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, left an ineradicable mental image in the minds of people worldwide and changed many aspects of life in America not the least of which is the moral, ethical and legal debate regarding the concept of racial profiling.
Under the current rules, directors’ duties including duty to act in good faith to the interest of the companies; duty to avoid conflicts of interest; duty not to profit from their offices, and duty of care and skill are enshrined in the common law rules and equitable principles and also in the Companies Act 1985 as amended by Companies Act 1989.
In the context of the foregoing, it must be noted that the sphere of international trade is one that generates considerable risks, especially through potential nondelivery of goods, delayed or damaged delivery of goods, etc. It is also difficult to derive a common universal standard that can be applied uniformly to all countries across the globe.
Police officers are placed in direct contact with society at large and this gives them a broad level of authority as well as the responsibility to handle that authority within the guidelines given to them. This ability to have direct contact with people to help those who need it makes a police officer much more useful for society.