Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
This is a law essay that seeks to analyze and advise parties involved in the “CIF Liverpool contract” (i.e. seller-A&W Ltd and buyer-N&Y Ltd). The problem arises when goods get lost on the voyage and the buyer (N&Y Ltd) declines to pay despite the seller having a bill of lading documentation, the insurance policy and the invoice.
The Title Register signifies the legality of the transfer of the property from Clifton and Barbara to Glen. Contextually, the claim made by Abdullah shall be treated as void concerning the fact that the contractual agreement between Clifton and Barbara and Abdullah had been withdrawn on the grounds of low price by Abdullah.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
5 pages (1250 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
The author’s of this study look at correlations that exist between victimized as an adolescent and becoming a juvenile delinquent. The findings indicate that since delinquent youth engage in risky activities, they are likely to become victims of crimes themselves.
In the near future, it is expected that CSR will become a common function within the corporate world whereby each and every organization will be participating in activities and actions that they are fully accountable for. Various laws are being enacted to ensure that companies have no option but to behave in a socially responsible manner.
NHTSA, then, called a public hearing after reopening the rulemaking process, where forth the Modified Standard 208 was retracted. Their claim stated that the utilitarian values of air bags and passive seatbelts are no longer justifiable in automobile security given, questioning the benefits of passive restraints.
As such, this section of the paper seeks to compare and contrast the traditional view, human relations view and the interactionist view of organizational conflict. According to Verma (1998), the traditional view of organizational conflict “assumes that conflict is bad.” It often leads to poor performance of the organization.
He proposed that these leaders are effective in different scenarios, those who have a higher degree of orientation towards task are more effective during situations that are very difficult and in situations that are highly out of a leader’s control (Lussier, 2010, p.158).
Much research has been conducted on the organized nature of crime to which is associated the term “contested concept”. Different meanings of organized crime have been studied and obtained by researchers.
Hong Kong’s common law defines lawful and unlawful cases of homicide. Though proving every ‘unlawful’ killing, beyond a reasonable doubt, sometimes presents the defense with a lifeline, leading to the acquittal of ‘guilty’ suspects. Murder refers to killing where the situation does not warrant self-defense, avoidance of crime or capital punishment.
Jose Padilla an American citizen born in Brooklyn New York, arrested in connection with the September 11th attack, and accused of collaboration with Al Qaeda and Taliban militias. upon His arrest, they confined Padilla for more than three years without trial on any criminal or civil charges.
For the time that John knew Juliet, he knew that Juliet loved dolls. When he returned home from his studies, John decided to surprise Juliet. Coincidentally, the following day after his return from abroad was Juliet’s birthday. Therefore, he found it the right time to visit and surprise her with a birthday present.
12 pages (3000 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
The Public Employees’ Fair Employment Act, stated under the Civil Service Law 200-214, commonly referred to as the Taylor Law is a statute governing the labor relationships that cover public employees in the state of New York.
The applicants were disadvantaged since they could not kill themselves. They proposed that others should kill them. However, Section 2 of the Suicide Act 2010 states that it is unlawful for persons to assist others to commit suicide, and whoever assists will be charged with murder. The FPP had provided guidance on how and when the murder assisters should be prosecuted.
The introduction needs to be more specific, using apt legal terminology, and stating the facts of the case clearly. Besides, the introduction should also have identified the terms of reference of the court, or the basic point of dispute in the court, right at the beginning of the summary and not in the second body passage.
The paper also involves rewriting the same summery in order to get rid of the available errors as a way of ensuring that the decisions are clearly explained. The final decision by the court would then be established after correcting the summery mistakes. Case Summery Report Overview This section entails a brief report about a general view of the court summery including the shortcomings, errors, and suggestions for possible improvements.
The whites rarely respect the blacks and often accord them low dignity. The blacks have therefore experienced cruel segregation of all forms in the hands of the whites. They have been isolated as criminal groups through racial profiling. They have been discriminated at places of work and denied jobs in disregard of their qualification and ability.
Generally, the ruling of accidental cases has been subjected to many legal criticisms based on differentiated inferences. Accidental events usually depict a negative outcome, which could have been shunned or prevented subjected to the prior recognition or prediction of the unfavorable circumstances.
Mrs. Roadway’s concern about the VAT invoice arises from her previous issues with VAT where she was subjected to a VAT audit that led to a loss of a lot of money for Mrs. Roadway as she did not have any paperwork like a VAT invoice from the supplier to substantiate that she had paid VAT. There are legal representatives for the Jeffersons Company.
On April 5th, 2013 at 2:00 pm, the police received a bulletin that a black man between the ages of 20 and 30 years had robbed a shop known as Moon’s Sandwich shop the south of Madison in Chicago. Chicago Police, Officer Jones and Officer Smith, responded promptly and drove towards the scene. When at Madison they saw a man running Westbound on Western Avenue toward Talman.
The petitioner in this case was Mr. F. David Mathews, while the defendant was Mr. George Eldridge (OYEZ, “Mathews v. Eldridge”; Legal Information Institute, “Powell, J., Opinion of the Court”). FACTS OF THE CASE MATHEWS v. ELDRIDGE, 424 US 319 (1976) is a litigation of the Supreme Court of the United States, which is related with securing the social benefits of the US citizens.
Improvements to the Law as Introduced by the Defamation Act 2013
In relation to freedom of expression and people’s dependency over the use of information technology such as the Internet, the Defamation Act 2013 was enacted in order to improve the existing English defamation law.
The boundary between business and social responsibility has been obscured; instead, a symbiotic relationship between the two concerns is conceived. Thus, a business, by serving the interests of its broad stakeholder pool inclusive of the community and society in general, also pursues the wealth-generating goals of its shareholders.
Your affiant has contributed significantly to the improvement of the anti-narcotics campaign, through numerous arrests and subsequent convictions of suspects. Your affiant possesses surmountable knowledge and has undergone extensive training in antinarcotics law enforcement from numerous antinarcotics agencies.
Though the proof the eyewitness presents can be supportive in mounting leads, spotting criminals, and acquit the not guilty, this proof is not flawless. Even candid and well-intentioned witnesses can create mistake, such as naming the wrong individual or failing to recognize the executor of a crime.
In the referred case scenario, an intentional infliction relating to emotional distress was reportedly conducted by William Cranston, who is running an organization named Preserve Youngsville for Retirees (PYR), which affected the victim, Elizabeth Walsh. Assessing the background of the case, it can be viewed that the infliction of the emotional distress behavior of Cranston caused severe depression in Walsh’s personal and social life.
The International Association of Arson Investigators, IAAI (2011) advices that one should look for expertise in areas one is not familiar with, for example structural engineering. Resources are needed to do post-fire investigations that determine the cause, spread and damage of the fire or other issues.
Police misconduct is a moral decadency that has found itself in the police officers' departments. These are vices that should be dealt with accordingly from both a moral perspective and a legal perspective. Most of these cases of police misconduct are due to the educational level of the police and due to the personality of others.
Also known as the sovereign citizen movement, sovereign citizens is an amorphous grouping of American commentators, litigants, and financial scheme promoters who believe that they are only answerable to the common law, but not the US government and its laws and statutes, whether these laws and statutes emanate from federal, municipal or state level.
Whether the crime solicited for is a misdemeanor or a felony, under common law solicitation is regarded as a misdemeanor. Solicitation does not necessarily require that the person solicited actually commit the crime but rather, the defendant can be convicted if the prosecution can prove that he/ she acted volitionally and with intent to cause solicited person to commit crime.
Origins of American Criminal Law For us to have a meaningful discussion of the present criminal law in America we have to first look at a brief history. Criminal law in the US is largely based on English common law that was imported during the colonial times.
Many times in life, human beings are faced with situational dilemmas in which they have to follow one path and leave the other. The fact that following each path has its own positive and negative aspects, makes it a complex matter of choice and critical decision-making must be engaged to come around the situation.
The greatest concern for most businesses now is to achieve as much competitive advantage as possible to distinguish themselves from the rest, not only for-profit motivations in the present but also for longer life in the future. In that case, business strategies employed by business corporations target to achieve two most important goals, to see that the businesses remain profitable and to ensure they remain relevant in the future.
This dialogue is important for both parties but it should be a compromise in that the security and cultural coherence of Western Europe is respected as well as Muslim communities are allowed to integrate on mutually acceptable terms which will allow their right development and evolution as cultural and social partners.
A Crime in English and Canadian Law.English and Canadian laws have some major similarities in general since Canadian law has drawn its genesis from the English version of criminal law like many other countries of the world. Criminal law has some major components that are required to exist in order to prove a commission of a crime.
Both divorce laws have their merits and demerits. Though the English law has been continuously adapted and amended to face the demands of modernity, Islamic law remained the same for hundreds of years. In the modern age, people have begun to question the lack of divorced women’s right to marital property, which is acknowledged by the English.
the occupants of the white minivan opened fire on the police officers, killing two of them. The malefactors were Jerry Kane and Kane’s 16-year-old son, Joseph Kane who were also shot dead. Further investigations and inquiries revealed that Joseph Kane and his son Joseph Kane were members of a deeply anti-government movement known as a sovereign citizen.
Correspondingly, Long Island Care at Home Ltd is the opposing party to the claims made by Evelyn Coke. The citation for this case is Long Island Care At Home, Ltd v. Coke, 551 US 158 (2007) (Cornell University Law School, “Supreme Court”). FACTS OF THE CASE Long Island Care At Home, Ltd V.
The author of the paper states that a key factor associated with the growth in the insurance sector in GCC is a low penetration rate. This low insurance infiltration, despite the presence of strong primary growth drivers, continues to offer enough opportunities to insurers in the GCC.
An effective contract engages various aspects including laws along with policies, security concerns, payment related issues, notice to commence a project and communication process among others. It is worth mentioning that a valid contract involves certain significant facets such as offer and acceptance, consideration, legal terminology.
According to the report several organizations implemented business expansion strategy in order to increase their market share and develop potential client base around the globe. This global expansion strategy forced these organizations to adopt and implement aggressive business strategies to maintain its competitive position.
Which Of The Protections Available To Criminal Offenders Through The Bill Of Rights Do Not Currently Apply To The States? ‘Bill of Rights’ is the combined name which has been provided to the primary ‘Ten Amendments’ to the US. The main intention of framing the Bill Of Rights is to ensure that rights of the individuals in the community could be safeguarded.
Article 12 of the Pact provides that the Pact will only come into effect once it has been endorsed by ten states. State K is the tenth state to ratify the pact. The ratification of the pact by state K, therefore, makes the pact enforceable. Notwithstanding the reservations of State L on the ratification of the pact by State K the Pact is deemed enforced unless State L pulls out of the Pact.
ACS U2IP. In its capacity as the highest court of the land, the Supreme Court of the United States confers, on lower courts, the mandate and authority to hear cases (Garner, 2006). By so doing, the Supreme Court grants the courts either civil or criminal jurisdiction (or both).
The Employment-At-Will Doctrine is a controversial one, since it allows an employer to dismiss employees at will, even without establishing a just cause for termination. Therefore, the employee whose contract has been terminated has no right to claim any compensation for contract termination.
The sexual violations may induce permanent trauma on the victim if not properly taken care of. Sexual violations among children is a problem that has been seen across the world and even in Canada, reports show an increase in the number of sexual violations among children.
The paper seeks to critically analyze the Supreme Court’s decision in Prest (Appellant) v PETRODEL Resources and others (respondent) [2013] UKSC 34. The paper will then consider whether or not the judgment is consistent with the authorities (other cases) on lifting the veil of incorporation, or whether the court has set a new case authority by this decision.
The application of consumer protection laws is different across many states and nations, but the principles governing them are the same world over. Notably, some nations might apply this principle at the national level and concerning well-known companies that breach consumer rights leaving them to suffer at the hands of small retailers.
By asking whether the aliens “… know they weren't in Mexico anymore?", (Boyle 286), the author literally paints a bleak eventuality that could dawn on them in the hands of the white harsh locals (286-287). Their likely exposure would work against them, leaving them with no any other option other than working under poor conditions or facing unceremonious repatriation back to Mexico.
In Robert v. City Fair Lawsuit, The plaintiff Mr. Robert went to a gas station at City Fair in Pennsylvania to fill his gas tank and have a cup of coffee. On a fateful day, Mr. Robert was conscious not to arrive late at work. As he went to fill his car tank, the plaintiff realized he did not have enough cash on himself.
Privatization of delivery entails an augmented dependence on the institutions and individuals without the ambit of the state for the extension of health care related services (Parliament of Canada, 2013). Thereby, there is an innate scope for the privatization of healthcare within the Canada Health Act 1984 and in a legal sense the privatization of health care is not something antithetical to the Canadian Law.