Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
14 pages (3500 words)
, Download 5
, Research Paper
Free
The author of the text touches upon the conflict of laws issues in terms of business over the Internet. Admittedly, the Internet provides worldwide access to business websites and customers can access services and products from anyplace in the world. However, lawmakers and courts find it difficult to determine the jurisdictional aspect of disputes.
Sanjay could potentially be liable for murder or manslaughter under the law of homicide. The classic definition of murder under English Law was propounded by Sir Edward Coke, asserting the two-stage definition requiring actus reus and men's rea: “Murder is when a man, unlawfully kills within any country of the realm any reasonable human being under the Queen’s peace, with malice aforethought”.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
A Charter party was enforced involving Mr. Francis, the owner of the Motor Vessel Drake and Mr. Philip on 1 October 2008 and chartered for the voyage from Plymouth to New York. The terms and conditions of the Charter Party (CP) comprise the following also. Firstly, the vessel is entitled to visit any port in any sequence. Secondly, the owner of the ship is not bound to bear any loss or damages.
Whilst the doctrine clearly goes further than the common intention constructive trust, the ad hoc judicial approach has been somewhat erratic and inconsistent. Ultimately, the ease with which a third party proprietary right can be protected against a purchaser depends on the nature of the right whether legal or equitable, which is further highlighted by the implementation of the LRA 2002.
It is the regulatory authority and provides guidelines to the Member States, whenever required. The Member States must incorporate the Directives issued by the Commission into their national law completely, correctly and within the stipulated time. Furthermore, they have to appraise the Commission about the steps and measures taken,
The author states that plaintiffs contend that Daou fraudulently inflated the price of its stock by reporting revenues before they were earned, in violation of GAAP. They claim that the said company employed an accounting method known as the percentage-of-completion method, which is used primarily to account for progress on long-term projects.
The remedies against a public nuisance are (a) prosecution under the Penal Code or any local ordinance; or (b) A civil action; or (c) Abatement, without judicial proceedings. Criminal prosecution is instituted only for a public nuisance, and not for a private nuisance. Criminal intent, in this case, is immaterial.
If arbitrary arrests and detention remain a practice, how does our own critical view of such behavior settle with arrests justified under the Patriot Act? What about detainees at Guantanamo, held without trial? The conclusion of justice, then, may lie in the very ideological perspective of the person judging.
Stewie, a friend of Peter, was asked by the latter to work in the pub, in the place of a waiter, who had fallen ill. Peter subsequently, promised Stewie £50 for this work. Later only, Peter refused to pay him for this work. As per the case law, Stewie has to be paid the agreed-upon amount by Peter, for the work performed by him in the pub.
Directives issued by the EU need to be enforced by Member countries; there are seemingly no escapes, however, its modalities and modus operandi are subject matters to be decided by its National Courts and lawmakers. However, what is important is that directives cannot be ignored, brushed aside, or partially enforced by the Member States, nor any compromises made on its practical implementation.
Whereas this translates to the fact that the court considered a constricted approach to the conditions of data protection, it also took a considerably extensive approach to the FoI ones. In this case, the weight of which act would prevail depends on the significance it poses as well as its overall impact.
The first point taken to support the thesis that the government has no moral responsibility to ban same-sex marriage is that there is a history of normality when it comes to the practice of gay marriage. The objector cites the time of Plato as proof that homosexuality has been, for ages, a widespread practice, and in a variety of different cultural contexts.
To start with, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 provides consumers or purchasers in general with a remedy for defective products under a contract for the sale of goods. Courts have taken the position that the Sale of Goods Act 1979 imposes upon the vendor of goods and products a duty to ensure that the goods and products are sold under a contract.
It could be noted that it would not have an effect on the law on the statute books at present, but it could still lead to the ruling of past actions as invalid or illegal. In principle, the two Acts which were under the provisions of the 1911 Act preceding its amendment by the 1949 Act should not be influenced.
A duress defense is available when the defendant can prove that the threat functioned to zap his will. Stuart must therefore demonstrate that there was an immediate link between the threat and his conduct. Of this, there is little doubt. Robert threatened to cut Stuart loose together with Terry unless Stuart cut Terry to lose himself.
The HOL has a significant number of members and if they do not correctly represent the interests of the common man, especially in terms of gender and social background, the purpose of the democratic process is defeated. It is true that the experience of the seniors does go a long way in supporting the decisions and issues of the House.
On the other hand, the quasi-judicial role of a person gives him the authority to decide on disputes and impose penalties on the person and the organization (Wikimedia Foundations, Inc.). One of the recent events in the Post Office is the conflict between two postmen who are asked to deliver between two adjacent counties.
The author states that one of the core ideas in Liberal thinking is that of the democratic peace thesis derived from the Kantian maxim claiming that republican (democratic) states do not fight one another. For Kant, the reasoning was simple: democratic states were internally more peaceful due to the pacific effects of international trade.
The law of contract stipulates three fundamental requirements for the formation of a legally enforceable contract; namely; offer, acceptance and consideration (it is important to note that contracting parties must have legal capacity to enter into a contract and it is presumed from the facts given that capacity is not an issue in this case).
This paper gives information that patented becomes known to the public before patenting, then it becomes ineligible to be patented. The promoters, therefore, should take care not to disclose the details of their product to any source, newspaper, science journal or anyone else before initiating the process of patenting.
Previously the consumer (in business transactions) often fell vulnerable to the seller or supplier. The consumer had very little protection against the exemption clause or unfair terms that were hidden in contracts. Since 1977 the consumer can take refuge under the Unfair Terms of a Contract Act 1977 (UCTA), which has given the consumer extra protection.
Similarly, the previous owner should be made to return the kitchen units as these were fitted into the property. Although there is no specific mention of any damage having been caused by their removal the implication of these units having been ‘fitted’ implies that they have become fixtures of the property.
Gun ownership ranks high among these political ideologies and attempting to ban all guns would make these feelings even stronger. To make the case for upholding the widely perceived ‘right’ to bear arms by allowing rifles and shotguns of a certain length while banning handguns and assault rifles seems the sensible solution and a fight that could be won.
Arthur was in a gang. He frequently carried a knife which he said he did to protect himself. He regularly used cannabis which made him paranoid and he frequently had psychotic episodes where he thought he was being attacked by aliens.
In the event the Member State fails to accept the opinion, the Commission commences judicial proceedings against the infringing Member State. Under Article 228 the Commission is at liberty to impose penal fines against the Member State subject to the Article 226 process.
The author states that the closure principle is basically the idea that “knowledge is closed under known logical implication.” Skeptics assume that all knowledge has this closure property as a major piece of support for their arguments, but the author suggests that because closure sometimes fails, skeptics have still not proved their argument.
10 pages (2500 words)
, Download 2
, Research Proposal
Free
The enactment of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 further made changes to Section 338 and added Section 338, which limited the foreign tax credit consequences which would otherwise result from a Section 338 election, stating that Section 338 does not apply for purposes of determining the source or character of any item in Sections 901 and 908 of the Code.
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was created by the US and its allies after the Second World War. Its creation was an answer to the disruptions of trade that happened during the Great Depression and during World War II. The GATT was signed in 1948 and was considered as an after war opening of trade liberation in the World.
According to the report the community believes that the police as law enforcers lack integrity, are corrupt, and practice a strange unethical behavior. Even though many commissions have been set to investigate this behavior, their recommendations have not been fully implemented. Ethics is a process of training.
Britain has experienced sharp rises in registered crimes over the past three decades, with a maximum of about 7000 registered crimes per 100,000 inhabitants in 1988. Since then, crime rates have been lessened in England and Wales. According to the Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004 annual report, violent crimes comprised 23% of all BCS crimes.
Alice, from the age of 16, had worked for Mr. Wilson as his housekeeper and governess for his three children; Bentley, Clarice, and Damian and had lived with the family. After the demise of Mr. Wilson, the property was divided equally between his two sons, Bentley and Damian.
Even though the extent of DPA is quite wide, still the Information Commissioner’s Office is at some extent unable to save the Kingdom’s populace from unexpected data losses, as a matter of fact, the largest data loss ever recorded in history which occurred on the inauspicious 21st of November 2007 was within the United Kingdom itself, and that too by the inappropriate management by government’s recruits themselves.
The youth justice system involves children and young people aged ten to seventeen in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, eight years old in Scotland and fourteen in Italy who break the law. They are sometimes referred to as juvenile offenders. Since the young person is yet to discover their role and responsibility within themselves and in the community dealing.
With this being said I do not think that corporate leaders should be punished more severely just because they are in a corporation. In America, we think it is important that anyone who does something wrong should be prosecuted to the highest extent of the law. The problem is that the justice system is terribly unfair from the beginning.
Migrant women promote poverty reduction endeavors in their home country by sending back some of their income to their families. This money is important to the economy in the sense that it is not given out as credit. If these funds are used for income-generating activities, they can raise the Gross Domestic Product in their home country.
The American government’s foundation based on the division of system of being divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches with the capacity to restrain the others from exercising their authority with control or oversight has proven to be an efficient and reliable method of governing the country fairly and, so far, without the fear of tanks rolling down the streets to provide military support.
Another reason recognized for the research of wrongful convictions is that if any individual is wrongfully accused then he is not only being punished for a crime he did not commit but he is actually suffering in the stead of the actual criminal. The criminal meanwhile is celebrating independence and may be encouraged to do the criminal offense again.
Interestingly the Arbitration clause was held to have no effect at all on her access to EEOC. This rule is also contained in a similar recent case. If the Indian lady was not an employee but merely an agent of the company or a hired contractor it can be seen from a perusal of the employment law that things would have been slightly different.
8 pages (2464 words)
, Download 4
, Research Paper
Free
This paper tackles the crime of sexual assault, its definition; an overview of what it is all about; the available direct statistics concerning the subject matter; the effects of sexual assault on the victim; where sexual assaults are commonly committed; the legal and civil remedies available to the victim; characteristics of the sex offender; and finally a literature review of sexual assault cases with an additional emphasis on cases where they are committed while the assailant and possibly the victim too is intoxicated with alcohol.
The author claims that public policy considerations against anti-competitive behavior revolve around keeping the prices of commodities and services affordable to the public while still achieving a high level of quality in goods and services. The FTC monitors the consumer market for possible violations in anti-competition and anti-trust policies.
The term intellectual property refers to the attributes, resources, possessions, and assets that are the outcome of an individual’s intellect and brain, which could either be tangible or intangible. In other words, intellectual property is the product of man’s imagination and thoughtfulness that may be the result of his deep concentration, hard work, or individual as well as collective mental effort.
In the United States, there is a lack of uniformity when it comes to the regulation on banning the use of cell phones while driving. Among the states that has successfully passed a law that bans the use of mobile devices while driving includes: California, Connecticut, and District of Columbia among others.
When the property sale deal was being completed, Wanda, Simon’s wife was in the hospital. Simon’s wife has a strong legal and equitable interest in the property. This factor becomes significant when considering the question of unconscionability and applying the law of estoppel which primarily operates in the form of constructive trust.
As provided for in Section 1 of the said act, “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.”
In terms of Jurisprudence, Dworkin’s idea of society speaking with one voice is more than the consistent application of the law since it includes the idea that society will also give the equality of respect to all its members with the jurisprudence system followed in that particular social system (Dworkin, 2002).
5 pages (1250 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
The plaintiffs will be best served if they can compel the resort to pay all of the damages and leave them to any reimbursement rights on their own. If, however, this is a several liability jurisdiction then the plaintiffs must determine whether Tex’s proffered testimony justifies sacrificing his share of the damages.
6 pages (1582 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
In contrast, the HL made a declaration of incompatibility in R (Anderson) v Home Secretary and said that the Home Secretary could not decide the minimum period that a murderer must stay in prison. This was not a fair trial under Article 6, because a trial should not be conducted by a judge, not a politician.
Agreements, that attempt to prevent, distort or restrict competition in the common market, are in violation of Article 81(1) EC. If an agreement violates Article 81(1) EC, then it is not necessary to establish anti-competitive behavior. In Métropole Télévision, the Court of First Instance had stated.
The different Member States of the EU have to comply with the decisions taken by the latter. Moreover, these decisions, apparently, enhance the power of the executive to the detriment of Parliament in the Member States. These decisions serve to fortify the position of the national executive, despite opposition from the national legislative bodies.
The Court explained that the manufacturer is not required to contemplate misuse by any careless, ignorant, or incompetent person (Murphy v. Cory Pump and Supply 382). The alleged defect in this mower was not latent or concealed (Murphy v. Cory Pump and Supply 382).