Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The paper compares place chosen by parties and place of perfection of contract. When relying on Article 3 of the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual obligations, one must be able to “demonstrate with reasonable certainty that the parties have chosen a particular law as the governing or applicable law; it must be the real choice which the parties had a clear intention to make.”
In assessing whether there is potential for filing a claim, the Courts will determine the substantive and procedural fairness of the decision taken by the school. Procedurally, it may be noted that the school has adhered to the three-step dispute resolution procedure, which employers are obliged to follow.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
The case revolves around the growing Robotics Industry of Europe where key players are currently undergoing extensive research and development activities. In the case at bar, we two competing companies, the NKK which is a Japanese conglomerate with shares quoted on the Tokyo Exchange and Advanced Robotics, Inc.
The Royal Prerogative is the embodiment of the customary powers, privileges, and immunities exercised by the executive (Crown/Monarch), recognized in common law jurisdictions. It originated in the medieval period when the King acted as the head of the kingdom and at the same time, like a feudal lord.
5 pages (1250 words)
, Download 3
, Research Paper
Free
Another version is “the accused is presumed to be innocent until it has been declared guilty by a court,” and media can refer to the accused only as ‘accused’, ‘alleged criminal’ or the ‘defendant’. There is another argument that this form of interpretation disregards the authority of the higher courts.
A trustee is a person who holds and administers the proceeds of a trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries, in accordance with the intentions of the testator. A trustee is placed in a position of responsibility and has a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of a trust. However, there is also a potential for misuse of that power.
In the present case, the matter of Malika Boukbout v. France has its genesis in a French law enacted to prohibit students wearing signs or attire through which they exhibit conspicuously a religious affiliation in public elementary schools, junior high schools. The law also authorizes school management to introduce internal regulations.
Under Article 4(1) of the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome 1980), “To the extent that the law applicable to the contract has not been chosen in accordance with article 3, the contract shall be governed by the law of the country with which it is most closely connected.
They serve as functional links to the sound economics of different nations and a primary stimulus for the furtherance of transnational relations. As nations become interconnected, multinational corporations create avenues for interactions with foreign nations bringing the lure of foreign investment and capital.
In order to determine whether an agreement has actually been concluded, it is essential to inquire whether in the negotiations which have taken place between the parties there has been a definite offer by one party, and an equally definite acceptance of that offer by the other. This is not the situation in the present case.
The economists and lawyers now tend to treat property as a bundle-of-right or as a residual of a contract. Traditionally, property is regarded as a right to a thing, good against the whole world or an indefinite class of persons. It is a right in rem. Right in personam, on the other hand, arises out of contractual relations or judicial judgments.
These speculative ill-treatment cases, such as those involving extradition to countries where there is a serious risk of treatment, illustrate the flexible nature both of the notion of ill-treatment and of the relevant threshold. With regard to the concept of `permissible roughness of treatment', treatment or punishment can only be adjudged.
The case of Oxley v Hiscock proves a common intention trust is a strong basis for distribution of assets under a trust, such allocations are to be made on the basis of proportionate representation through investment. It is a good development because it helps to establish the division of the assets in a trust with a greater degree of fairness.
Section 9 of the Wills Act of 1837 requires a dying person who is a donor to specify the recipients of his gifts. A “beneficiary” may be defined as the person for whose benefit a trust has been created, to ensure that the property and assets of the dead person are distributed by the trustee to the person/s named as beneficiaries in the will.
The expense of government to the individuals of a great nation is like the expense of management to the joint tenants of a great estate, who are all obliged to contribute in proportion to their respective interests in the estate.
The lawyer used by Jack is one the manager has recommended. Therefore, there is a potential conflict of interest that arises, since the lawyer will not be inclined to fully highlight to Jack, the dangers of offering his home as security, because he also deals with the bank and will be interested in maintaining his relationship and business with the bank.
However, once the broken by the prospective seller, the prospect of liability commences. If the buyer elects to disclose information not known to the buyer, the good or property which he seeks to pass to the buyer must adhere to the stipulations of the Sale of Goods Act 1974.
This same provision was also carried over into the Supreme Court of Judicature 19252 and the Supreme Court Act of 19813. Therefore, the determination of relief was left largely as a matter of judicial discretion, and this has been guided by the principles of fairness and equity after taking into account, the interests of all the parties concerned.
There are problems with the jurisdiction of the relevant courts and the nature of the law for implementation, which may contravene the established national laws and constitute an encroachment of the sovereignty of national laws. In the case of war criminals, states are also reluctant to pursue action against war criminals aggressively.
Equity comes into play typically when none of the parties to the dispute has done anything against the law, but their rights or claims are in conflict. (en.wikipedia). In the case discussed, we see a similar situation whereby Neil, owner of Neil & Co Ltd, prior to his death left a will stating a few gifts to different organizations.
The major impact which these circumstances have on the existence of a contract between Whizz PC Ltd and the firm is that due to the later contract, the former becomes null or void. In this case, the first party was still in the process of agreeing with the second party during which it gets a good offer from the third party and finds this offer more profitable if it accepts it.
This paper outlines that the Appellees found that the car was, in fact, a “clipped” vehicle with “a 1986 Taurus welded into the front half of a 1989 model”. Upon confronting the Defendants, the Appellees found that the car was originally sold to the Defendants by Charles McDaniel of Chuck’s Auto (“Appellant”), who made the original representation.
The paper shows that as with most old laws that have outlasted several generations, this law had become moot and academic although the concept of charities remains to be relevant to society. For purposes of understanding the concept of charity better, let us look into how the framers of the Elizabethan law define charity.
The relevant areas of law that will apply in Sandra’s case are the Employment Act of 2002, with the revised Dispute resolution (Regulations) 2004, which came into effect on October 1, 2004.The Employment Act pertains to the provisions governing employer-employee conduct and conditions at the workplace, including fairness and resolution of disputes.
Employee representatives must be contacted so that those potentially in danger of dismissal can also be warned of the impending move and employers have a duty to consult with the trade unions in the event of impending dismissals. Section 195(1) spells out the fact that dismissals due to redundancy are categorized as being “for a reason not related to the individual concerned.”
8 pages (2000 words)
, Download 3
, Literature review
Free
Trusts are relationships between two or more parties such that one of the parties, the trustee, is vested with the legal title to real or personal property and this relationship is subject to obligations imposed by a court of equity, or expressly undertaken to keep or use the property for the benefit of the other party or parties known as the beneficiary of the trust.
Albeit there was considerable opposition to Miranda warnings for more than fourteen years after the decision, these days, little practical impediment exists in the police's ability to procure a confession. As detailed by Sociologist Richard Leo, police use a variety of deceptive techniques to extract confessions these days.
African and Chinese laws though diverse in many ways have deeply rooted similarities which remain true even in modern times. Although some self-imposed practices may be to be bordering on the extreme at one point or another, both laws express a kind of harmony and balance that hold its people together.
To establish a cause of action for willful murder, two factors must be established (a) the causing of the death of another human being, and (b) the intent to cause grievous bodily harm, which is referred to as ‘malice afterthought’, and (c) the physical act of injury must match with a men's rea or the requirement of the ‘guilty mind’.
Some relevant lessons can be drawn along the way. A major lesson is learned about the utmost importance of human rights. Another lesson is the need of a sound international criminal law where universal jurisdiction can really be taken into account in specific cases of human rights violations.
Two of the common elements of the African and Chinese legal systems include the belief in self controlled order and the avoidance of the formal systems of law by resorting to various informal methods of dispute settlement within society.
Some of the formality requirements include the intentions of the testator being required to be spelled out in writing with beneficiaries clearly named and the transfer associated with the payment of necessary duties. Section 53 deals with a subsisting trust, 53 deals with oral declarations of trust in the land.
When businesses grow and expand it is natural that disputes will arise. In the wake of this, parties often favor a private and informal settlement of disputes, in a businesslike fashion that enables them to further their business interests without strangling their business relationship. It is for such occasions that arbitration is designed—for prompt, and efficient resolution of disputes.
In reality, the business of Government is carried out by the Ministers of State in the name of the Crown. The Government of the United Kingdom has a bicameral Parliament, comprised of the Houses of Commons and Lords. There is an unwritten set of rules comprised of the Acts of Parliament, judicial decisions as well as political practices.
Section 5 of the Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 states that: "An employer who on any day is not insured in accordance with this Act when required to be so shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.
Effectively the Court of Appeal ignored a House of Lord’s decision; a decision which has been around for more than 400 years. Pinnel’s Case [1602] examines the doctrine from the view point of Creditors who are already owed something [a legal duty or money] and appear to agree to accept part-payment of the debt.
According to the Principles of European Contract Law, particularly Article 2.301 (ex-art. 5.301) – Negotiations Contrary to Good Faith section 3, “it is contrary to good faith. And fair dealing, in particular, for a party to enter into or continue negotiations with no real intention of reaching an agreement with the other party” (Mercatoria, L., 2006).
There has been a long debate about the Rule of Law in many countries besides China. Many people argue that the Rule of Law is just political rhetoric, so there is no need to talk about it in our society. Many people are also confused on what the Rule of Law really means.
The European Economic Community (EEC) was an association created in 1957 by the Treaty of Rome in order to integrate the economies of Europe. After the 1st of November, 1993 it has been renamed as the European Community. This term also commonly refers to the European Communities, which comprise the EC.
Two boys, aged 11 and 12, set fire to some newspapers in a backyard of a shop and then proceeded to throw the burning papers under a plastic rubbish bin. As a result, the bin caught fire which spread to the shop, destroying goods that were worth about 1M pounds. The boys were charged with arson, contrary to Sections 1 and 3 of the Criminal Damage Act of 1971 for reckless and criminal negligence.
7 pages (1750 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
Free
The introduction of the Statute of Frauds in 1677 introduced the requirement of formalities into a will in order to prevent frauds against the estate of a deceased person. This has evolved over time into the Wills Act of 1837 as amended, under Section 9 of the Act, that protects against fraud.
With the amendments of the treaty and the use, preliminary reference procedure ECJ was able to transform itself into what cannot be easily stopped. The fact that no strong political action could stop its ruling particularly on the preliminary ruling which is unappeasable and the various applications of the principle of supremacy of the EC laws.
The respect for the human rights of an individual includes the “freedom from discriminatory or arbitrary treatment”. The implications of human rights within a legal framework is that an individual has certain rights, which will be the same for everyone, irrespective of age, gender, religion, nationality, or sexual orientation.
Mr. Branning can enforce his prior agreement with Alfie through Ian, but this will most probably have to take place through some mode of arbitration rather than a battle in the courts and is therefore mostly, a personal matter that will have to be settled between Mr. Branning and Ian on some compromise basis.
Younger employees also, in general, have a higher chance to gain regular employment once atypically employed. This, understandably, is also true for better-educated workers. Further, studies find that atypical workers who have not maintained steady employment have a smaller opportunity to gain regular employment.
However, Treschel identifies the inherent possibility for miscarriages of justice, especially in criminal trials, when there are two conflicting perspectives (a) the human rights perspective which mandates that the rights of the individual in question to a fair trial be ensured and (b) the public prevailing opinion against the individual.
According to the paper the ruling of the Supreme Court concerning civil rights cases stated that the Fourteenth Amendment only applied to actions of state governments; therefore individuals were free to violate the civil rights of other citizens. Most of the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was made nonbinding.
Once a working definition of “rehabilitation” is agreed upon, the task of the analysis becomes almost impossible, again, in trying to agree upon what “contemporary penal policy” really is. Over the course of this paper, these two issues will be addressed, though never completely resolved.
Considering similar cases, it can be said that as employees of the Home Office, the Prison Officers are legally responsible to act within the limits and ambits of their duties and since they have broken the law within the ambit of their employment, even the employers may be legally responsible for tort.
Freedom may be a birthright but so is privacy. A child is ignorant and has to be lead to light through the right education. They must be taught that to maintain their own privacy they must learn to respect others’ privacy. Technology has to be used in constructive ways so as not to break the rules of the family, school religion culture.