Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The author explains that the Equality Act (2006) covered: the creation of the Commission on Equality and Human Rights, anti-discrimination in the provision of goods and services on the grounds of religion, and sexual orientation, and for the first time placed a duty on public authorities to promote equality of opportunity between men and women.
Negligence can be defined as protection οf person, property, and economic interest from damage caused by another person's failure to take reasonable care (Latmier, P., 2004. p.196), in which legal remedies are awarded for the victims in regret to the case. Tort law must be differenced from the law οf contract.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
From the above discussion for the first issue it can be said Balmoral has to show that the follow the guideline which develops by the case law. For the second situation the restrictive covenants by Balmoral will be enforceable. In the third situation, the question arises whether the Court considers Ali’s claim reasonably practicable though he was five minutes late.
The s.9 (1) of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 provides taking fingerprints without consent extends the circumstance in which the police may take a person’s fingerprints without consent to include taking fingerprints from a person arrested for a recordable offense and detained in the police station.
Legislation may be direct or indirect. Direct legislation means laws enacted by the legislature itself, Acts of Parliament. Indirect or delegated legislation means rules or laws laid down by a body or person to whom the legislature has delegated power to make such rules, regulations laid down by a minister under the power given him by an Act of Parliament.
Punitive damages have a positive influence on corporate ethics and social responsibility. Corporations have, countless times in both the past and the present, withheld vital information concerning the harmful effects of products on its users. They failed to disclose this information to the public and the consequence was, while they profited, and, in many instances, their lives were cut short.
Practical considerations in relation to performance contract are not present. At a minimum, a contract should be in writing. While an oral contract may be valid, it is very difficult to enforce such that "an oral contract is not worth the paper it is written is on." Finbar may not have a cause of action in contract to rely on.
The Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Underdown, that “immigrants who have committed crimes cannot be detained indefinitely, but must be deported within a reasonable period or released”. The Court went further in its ruling by saying “temporary and even illegal immigrants, not just U.S. citizens, are entitled to due process” (Levy, 2001).
A repeal of the Act wouldn’t change this aspect of the law at all. What it would change is the requirement that the subject of the search is notified beforehand. It is also widely believed that the PATRIOT Act enables law enforcement to obtain a warrant and conduct the search without prior knowledge of the subject of the search.
The researcher uses examples and relevant case law as well as recent developments, such as 2007 Japanese fishing vessels and the Volga case to accordingly discuss and evaluate the field of study. The essay then describes the procedure for State A of the case and the procedure for State B of the case.
The cases of William’s & Glyn’s Bank Limited v. Boland and another, which were consolidated because of the similarities of the facts, the wives claimed to have contributed to the purchase of their respective houses. Their rights, however, were not registered and only the husbands’ names appeared as proprietors of the properties.
The UK, unlike America, does not have a constitution but instead, the Human Rights Act is the United Kingdom’s version of a constitution of sorts. It outlines what one can and should be able to expect as far as personal rights. Again, as before stated, the Human Rights Act of 1998 is a sub-act of the European Convention Act.
You want to find out what evidence or information they may have and you also want to make sure that there will be no attacks on credibility once they take the stand. Evidence gathering is also crucial because whether you are representing your client as a plaintiff or a defendant, each position requires evidence.
The current proposal suggests that homes should be insulated from external noise but this is still not enough. Internal noise insulations should also be incorporated into the plan. Another alternative is through tenancy agreements. Landlords could assign responsibilities to tenants; failure to comply could lead to actions.
Despite this, the people have individual rights, and Britain has a long-standing tradition, whereby the rights and civil liberties of UK citizens have been accorded protection. This tradition creates an environment in which the legal position of such civil rights is always a debatable matter. It is also uncertain as to the extent that people have these liberties.
As the paper highlights, the abortion issue is multi-faceted and both sides of the issue provide credible, thought-provoking arguments. Only the individual can disseminate the information and make their own decision based on what they believe to be right. Everyone should know both sides on equal terms.
The author says that the initial complaint filed by Norman was founded on a claim in damages where she alleged that the respondent, Future Publishing Limited had used words which had a defamatory meaning. The substantive complaint arose out of words published by the defendant in a classic CD Magazine.
The classic and most-often cited definition states that a joint venture is an enterprise in which two or more separate firms or entities integrate their operations such that the following conditions are met: (1) the enterprise is under the joint control of parent entities, which are not under related control;
There were two approaches open to the Lords in determining whether in such circumstances the contract for sale is voidable or void altogether. This was significant since it determined the outcome and the consequences for the innocent third party who purchased goods subject to a pre-existing contract induced by fraudulent misrepresentation.
In some American states, the requirement for transferring an accused youth under the maximum age of jurisdiction into any criminal has been changed a lot. According to Richmond, W (2004), this is a twisted kind of since the youths are judged as mature, responsible adults if they get involved in criminal activities like commit murder.
5 pages (1487 words)
, Download 2
, Research Proposal
Free
Both the statutes and the case law are going to be analytically examined and evaluated following their relevance to the subject. On the other hand, the literature review published on the specific issue will be used to understand the effects of the existed Statutes and the case law on the protection of landowners from a potential theft of their land.
Licensing Laws in Australia for a driver's license differ among states and territories, but most of the involvement of a similar procedure and a graduated licensing system Queensland Learner License. Nomenclature varies between states and territories in Australia between the driver's license and driver's license "Learner Queensland License".
The conclusion can, therefore, be drawn that equity and common law remedies are working together to establish natural justice for the plaintiff and that although they have different remedies for achieving that aim the end result is that the plaintiff has a greater chance of getting the award best suited to their situation.
The obvious implications were that a person could be protected even if he or she failed to register his or her interest under the Land Registration Act 1925. This juxtaposition required that a bona fide purchaser conduct an aggressive investigation of title. He or she would be required to go beyond the registry and physically inspect the property.
There is an infinitely long list of disciplinary perceptions from which crime and the institutions dealing with crime could be studied. It is why there are so many doctoral programs and special journals in criminology nowadays which used to be a rarity. It has a lot of positive attached to it, especially the increased sophistication in this field.
Women who seek the assistance of agency placement services also place themselves at risk and their positions need to be protected through strong enforcement of legislatures, especially in the workplace settings. Similarly, people with disabilities would also need to be given special status, in order that they could serve useful purposes in society.
Lord Denning based his judgment on the wording of the contract between the parties which showed that estimates and contract sums had not yet been agreed upon; it was to be agreed in the future and by the parties themselves. On this basis, he concluded: “seeing that there is no agreement on so fundamental matter as the price, there is no contract.”
His father owned the ‘Ivy House’ together with the adjoining property called ‘The Hollies’, which were once one property. The Hollies were sold off in the ’60s. When Mr. Crane’s parents died, he became the sole owner of the property. The Ivy House (and it’s neighbor the Hollies) are both registered titles. There is a mortgage existing and land charges registered.
Economic duress is where one of the parties attempts to exploit the other party by insisting on the performance of the contract in situations that would lead to a financial loss for the other party. In general terms the courts will normally allow one of the remedies to succeed so that the person being placed under economic duress can avoid the contract.
The general purpose of the evidential rules discussed above is for the purpose of ensuring that criminal matters are not only resolved in fairness to the accused but in fairness to both sides. The judge’s role in criminal proceedings is to ensure that the trial is conducted in a fair manner and that in the process all of the relevant evidence is presented in the interest of both sides.
11 pages (2750 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
Free
It is evidently clear from the discussion that the Human Rights Act has a wide operational area that covers the courts, the public at large as well as the entire community. The users of such services can seek quality services from service providers. This would improve implementation and respect for human rights in the United Kingdom.
The Gambotto case in Australia was the one that set the ball rolling when it came to minority shareholder rights. It has been upheld in a number of cases that any amendment to the articles of a company should stand the Allen Vs Gold Reefs (1900) test. According to this test, there were two limbs that need to be satisfied.
The hotel is about to be visited by a representative of a world-famous hotel guide. Anxious to receive a good review, Ramsey has promised Atif a bonus of £500 if he does his job well and ensures that the visit runs smoothly. The town council has also promised Atif a bonus of £300 if he does his job well on the day of the visit.
If there is a defect in the workmanship and not in the goods supplied, then Peter can obtain redressal under the provisions of the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 and also under the provisions of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Under these provisions, Peter can claim monetary compensation, repair or replacement.
Individuals can make complaints directly to the Commission against their own country. If member states fail to adopt the provisions of the EC law or if they fail to integrate their national legislations with the EC law, then they become liable to compensate individuals for damages caused by such failure.
Racism is any form of bigotry, prejudice, violence, oppression, stereotyping or other socially divisive practice whose primary basis is the concept of race. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, racism is a belief or ideology that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race.
By virtue of Section 20 of the Wills Act 1837 and the first clause of the Nieve’s Will, all other wills, and testamentary dispositions are revoked and the Will in which Simon Landsford and Asif Khan are named as co-executors and co-trustees will surpass and replace all previous Wills executed by Nieve.
b) Sue is buying a house and goes to her local building society to arrange a mortgage. The mortgage company employs Notsogood, a firm of surveyors, to provide a report (at Sue’s expense) for them on the house she is hoping to buy. Notsogood is in a hurry and fails to report on some dry rot. Sue is shown the report by her building society.
It would be difficult to bring an action against Brick Ltd without proof that they must have known of the defects. The local authority is not likely to be held responsible as they employed independent consultants. As the consultants were hired by the local authority the only persons that would be able to bring an action against the consultants would be the council.
This must be applied to the provisions of Gretel’s will, to determine which of the specified allocations will constitute a valid trust which can be implemented. For instance, Gretel states that her friend Polly is to get her assortment of porcelain dolls, but ultimately, these dolls are to be shared among Gretel’s “nearest and dearest” according to her expectation.
The research illustrates that the law of defamation is by and large divided in its priorities. The law is more advantageous to the rich and the powerful who can afford the time and the expertise to argue their positions as complainants or defendants in defamations cases. Only those who can afford it will be protected from defamatory claims or protected from prosecution.
As we know, the breach of law is punishable. In the above-given scenario, both Alan and Doctor Chris should be punished for causing the relevant offenses as both unlawful act manslaughter and medical negligence is a crime. “A crime would seem to be any undesirable act which the state finds it most convenient to correct.
According to the research findings, a charge of wounding with intent under the Offences Against The Person Act of 1861 s.18 requires a specific intent to cause grievous bodily harm, while a charge of malicious infliction of grievous bodily harm or wounding merely requires a general intent of malice, in other words, an intent to do some harm.
Under our English law, a person can be said to be guilty of a crime if he or she proved to have committed a voluntary physical act or has omitted to perform an action which he or she should do under the law. Moreover, the act of the person must pass the test of criminal liability as expressed by the Latin maxim actus reus.
The author states that the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prevents the Government from making any laws respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency, is a Federal Government agency, is required not to prohibit the free exercise of religion.
The principle inherent to this case is a consideration. The legal meaning of consideration is not very different from the everyday usage of the term. From a legal standpoint, consideration can be seen as any act or forbearance which is of benefit to the person making the promise (promisor) or detriment to the person accepting the promise (promise).
In R v Willer (13), the defendant had driven recklessly to escape from a crowd of youths who appeared intent upon causing physical harm to the passengers in his car; in R v Conway (14), the defendant had driven recklessly to protect his passenger from what he had honestly believed was an assassination attempt.
The central purpose of the Alien Tort Claims Act was to access for justice the federal courts to aliens for adjudication of rights only recognized by international law (Filartiga v. Pena-Irala). McDodgy argued that since Sua Casa is not an American, the Alien Tort Claims Act prevents her from suing him.
Hence it reflects that the provisions of the European Union are very much in tune with the provisions of Germany and Belgium. The main objective of all these authorities has been the protection of interests of the customers and preventing sellers to follow unscrupulous commercial activities.
The author of the paper states that when assessing a claim for negligence the claimant has to prove that a duty of care existed between the parties. The claimant than has to show that the duty has been breached and as a result of the breach the plaintiff has suffered harm or financial loss.