Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The main impetus for following this doctrine has been to create fairness and certainty within the legal system by upholding the decisions of previous judges. Such precedents can only become significant if the legal reasoning of the judge is known and therefore subsequent courts will examine the ratio decidendi behind the decision before determining whether a precedent has been set.
The other major aspect of the bio-safety protocol concerns the establishment of a bio-safety Clearinghouse, designed to facilitate the exchange of scientific, environmental, technical and legal information on, and experience with, living modified organisms, with particular attention to the needs of developing and poorer countries.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Prior to the introduction of “the Human Rights Act 1988,” in a number of cases, the courts, in an effort to offer a safeguard for some fundamental rights, including freedom of expression and access to a court, were practiced to cancel delegated law that intimated with such privileges on this fundamental of simple legality.
In order to remove the inconsistency in UK law, the European Council should re-examine the concept of ‘in loco parentis’ and the existing law that covers the children’s rights. By paying less attention or abolishing these conflicting laws, it is possible to strengthen the law on physical punishment of children.
In the case of (Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl [1983] 2 AC 34): Brinkibon was a London company that bought steel from Stahag, a seller in Austria. Brinkibon sent their acceptance to a Stahag offer by Telex to Vienna. Brinkibon later wanted to issue a writ against Stahag and applied to serve an out of jurisdiction party.
Under the law, it is seen that the intentions of parties to the contract form a substantive part of the contract. This case is clear on the fact that both Molly and Kelly of Holy Farm (sellers of the ostensible Granny Apples) and Richard Bart buyer had no doubts in their minds about the need for contractual obligations to be enforced.
The author states that having many components they are all designed in a way that they work together and provide not only justice to the criminals but also protects the victims at the hand of these crimes. It enables the violators of laws to be prosecuted by conducting trials that are fair and just.
The author states that the most common law enforcement agency around the world is the police. Others include the United States Marshal Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), drug enforcement agency and the criminal investigation command. All these agencies require some kind of employee supervision for the smooth running of operations.
The author states that although the principles of liberalism had also commanded international affairs, those times were far and few in between. Rather than liberalism, the conduct of international affairs is almost always dominated by the principles of realism in which one’s national interest takes precedence over all other idealistic considerations.
Temper’s financial situation appears to be at cross-roads and admittedly the partners were hesitant about the ability to successfully manage an investment company. In doing so, they have acquired debts to their creditors/stakeholders and also have some outstanding debts to collect from Ashley. The company has also suffered damages both financially and to its reputation.
This appears to be a fair and reasonable similarity between the two elements of tort since equitable principles of law recognize that liability should equal culpability. It is for this reason that the tort of nuisance, like the tort of negligence, requires culpability/fault on the part of the defendant for liability purposes.
Isabel has based her grounds for divorce on the basis of a suspicion that John was having an affair with Emma. She also claims for divorce on the grounds of unreasonable behavior by John, who became depressed and withdrawn after his accident. In general, contesting a divorce is a difficult issue and grounds for divorce are generally allowed by the Courts.
Whether the agreement between ABC Ltd. and Grabit to pay the extra ₤10,000 is binding depends on the laws of contract. A legally binding contract has a number of components. An agreement between the parties alone is insufficient. The agreement must be accompanied by consideration and intent to create legal relations as well.
The author states that post-holocaust, the international community gravitated towards a human rights culture with the emphasis on outlawing scope for genocide, torture and human rights abuses. The preamble of the United Nations Charter highlighted the purpose of the UN as “saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war”.
The HRA 1998 has salient features like the U.K parliament capability to legislate incompatible legislation or Ministers cannot refuse to amend such incompatible legislation. Though HRA 1998 has not been granted an ‘exceptional’ or superior statue status, its scope and continuance remain subject to the desire of parliament.
The therapist, Boris, explained that he was doing pioneering research into foot massage and hypnotherapy and part of this involved Sally being hypnotized to relax her. Although she felt a little uneasy, she agreed. However she woke up and found Boris kissing her toes. She later found out that he had been suspended from practicing as a therapist following complaints by other women.
11 pages (3141 words)
, Download 1
, Research Proposal
Free
Paragraph 12.13 of Code C specifically points to "written statements made under caution" and a written statement under caution should normally be taken only at the express wish of a suspect. The police may ask the suspect if he wants to make a written statement but not to compel him to do so. These statements should only be made in person and not in correspondence.
13 pages (3434 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
The only possible reason that would appear to justify the reasoning of the Courts would be if the matter was considered from a revenue perspective. The Courts do not approve of tax evaders and therefore, they render decisions in individual cases such that the purpose of tax evasion through the medium of trusts is deflected.
11 pages (2957 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
Jim did not inspect the TV before signing the delivery slip. As he was closing the door and turn he tripped over his cat. Hurting himself, he went to the hospital and was admitted for a three month period. Upon returning home, Jim unpacked TV2 and when he attempted to turn on TV2 he found that it did not work.
Also referred to as the ‘Death Penalty’, it is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime called a ‘capital offence’ or a ‘capital crime. Persons who have been sentenced to death are usually kept segregated from other prisoners in a special part of the prison called ‘Death Row’ pending their execution.
The author states that the case of the prosecution in R v Turnbull was built upon the visual recognition of the defendants in the area around the venue of the robbery. The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle.
Merton is able to explain the occurrence of crimes as having to deal with individuals’ more important regard for the pursued rewards (goals) rather than the means to achieve them. Often enough, the means are not legal and legitimate but since the individual does not find such important, white-collar crime is easily committed.
In an effort to distribute his belongings in a way in which he sees fit, it is necessary for him to procure and name a legatee(s) in which he can trust his estate and affairs to. It is ultimately going to depend on what the subjective judgment of the legatee is as to where and how his estate is distributed and handled.
The 25 boxes are a very small number as compared to the 975 boxes they were able to successfully deliver in accordance with the terms of the contract. Maggie thinks she can get a cheaper deal on the boxes and is now using the apparent breach as an excuse to terminate the contract and to get her money back from Boxes and Things.
Atiyah stated that the courts had unnecessarily expanded the applicability of the law relating to negligence. This development had made it very easy for persons staking a compensation claim. In addition, this widening of the scope of negligence had resulted in a relaxation of the requirements needed to establish a duty of care and causation.
In the case of Terry v. Ohio in particular, a police detective driving in downtown Cleveland saw two men (later joined by a third) acting suspiciously. He later confronted the three, identifying himself as a police officer. One of them, Terry, mumbled something, which caused the officer to search him, where he found a pistol in his overcoat pocket.
The reason why both have opted for specialized courts within their respective legal systems is due to predominance of trade and commerce in both countries. Moreover, whereas the American dream has fuelled desires for capitalism, in the Indian scene it is the widespread entrepreneurial spirit that prevails.
The rationale, as described take the approach that failure to prevent such conduct when it is well known amounts to authorization on the part of the employer. Moreover, the employer has both a common law and a statutory duty to protect all of its employees from serious risk of harm and they failed to do so in Malcolm’s case.
The author states that Raphael Lemkin, an American scholar, defined the term genocide in 1944. Genos, in Greek means race or tribe, in Latin means to kill. The word genocide is used to describe the systematic extermination of a race or ethnic group either by the government or a religious group.
In accordance with the above, the role of lobbyists and special interest groups for the development of legislation in the specific sector seems to be closely related with the characteristics of each of its parts, the needs of each particular group of participants/ recipients of the care – elderly have different needs than the disabled people.
14 pages (3384 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
During the period from 1990 to 2000, water purification operations were carried out in England and Wales. In that endeavor, nearly thirty – six percent of the rivers were purified and their biological quality was improved. Moreover, forty – three percent of rivers were improved with respect to their chemical content.
The law distinguishes between an offer and an invitation to treat, which is not an offer but an indication of willingness to negotiate a contract. For example, in the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council, the words “may be prepared to sell” constituted an invitation to treat and not a distinct offer.
Constructive trusts have become prevalent in the area of contractual licenses. Without the use of the doctrine of equity protection for a third party would be non-existent due to the rules of privity of contract. Through equity third parties have been able to prevent licensors from breaking contractual licenses.
In the case of Lord Wilberforce used the word fiduciary to export “any incident of express trust.” Millet LJ in the case of Bristol and West Building Society v. Mothew (1996) 4 All ER 698 gives a more comprehensive view of what fiduciary means and how we should construe the relationship between the fiduciary and its principal.
Property has been traditionally a significant issue for every common law country. According to Allen (2000, 14) ‘one of the rights of fundamental law was the right to property; While the state had the power to acquire property compulsorily, it could only do so on payment of compensation and for a public purpose.
The uncodified constitution of Britain does not ensure the separation of powers at the national level. Moreover, it does not provide for a federal system of government. In the US there is an independent Presidency and Congress. The civil liberties in the US are protected by the US Constitution, which explicitly guarantees them through the Bill of Rights.
The contract could not be carried out due to the prevailing wartime regulations. The court held this to be sufficient grounds for deeming the contract to be frustrated (Maggi, 2004.P. 316). Hence, the contract between Ben and the Iranian companies stands frustrated, due to the existence of a war in Iran.
The author states that the concept of fault assumed the status of a legal requirement. The moral characteristics of fault were ignored by courts. Furthermore, the courts adopted an objective approach to the primary requirements of the inquiries into a liability, which became a barrier to the moral considerations inherent in fault.
The author states that each case will turn on its own specific facts with the result that the issue of fairness is subjective. Setting parameters of fairness in respect of discretionary executive powers is necessary for democratic concepts of indiscriminative justice. The government is likewise accountable to the public by virtue of judicial review.
The author states that we often hear that the purpose of government, or specifically the American government, is subjective: that the government exists for whatever ideology you choose. This would mean that the US government may just as well exist to provide all citizens a right to air conditioning as to provide basic security and maintain public order.
Empirical research findings reveal the medical benefits of marijuana, such as pain relief, control of vomiting and nausea and stimulation of appetite among patients. It is because of the scientifically proven therapeutic benefits of marijuana that its proponents are pushing for laws that support the use of marijuana for medical reasons.
9 pages (2250 words)
, Download 1
, Research Paper
Free
The purpose of the judicial system is to deliver justice and deter others from repeating the same. Capital punishment has been challenged for years. Many argue that it does not respect the sanctity of human life. Some consider life imprisonment more effective than capital punishment. Research has revealed there is a connection between capital punishment and homicide rates.
The new technology has widened the scope of infringement and severely compromised the rights of copyright holders. At the same time, measures that have been introduced thus far to protect the rights of copyright holders in an online environment are being abused so that they compromise the right to fair use of material.
Though usually illegitimate, the groups have had popular support and some of their leaders were revered and looked up to. The groups have intricate links with the political establishment of the day and can affect the results of elections. Both the organized crime groups plunder the very people whom they protect.
The offer of £1000 was not fully accepted but that June 27, 1840, the defendant wrote to the plaintiff’s agent and rejected the offer of £950. On June 29, 1840, the complainant’s agent made a letter to the defendant expressing to accept the offer, but the defendant refused to close any sale so that the plaintiff was moved to sue for performance.
Quite apart from keeping abreast of the ever-expanding positive obligations member states are required to ensure that the public is aware of these broadening rights. These developments arising out of the European Court of Human Rights interpretation of the Convention’s Articles are only part of the burden placed upon member states.
The shaft was duly handed to the carrier along with the transport charges for repair and delivery the next day, but due to the late delivery at Greenwich by the carrier, the shaft repair and reinstallation was delayed, beyond several days, which resulted in heavy losses and expenses for the mill owner.
The author states that the UK legal framework, in its present form, is largely representative of the nation’s historical and political developments of the past few centuries notably starting with the Treaty of Union, 1707, when Scotland became a part of Great Britain. The United Kingdom came into existence with the union of Great Britain.
The Act was a result of a three-year review of the existing Consumer Credit Act 1974, with the overriding objective of evaluating measures to facilitate a fairer, more transparent and competitive credit market by enhancing consumer rights and redress through enforcement measures and dispute resolution (J. Smith 2006).
Interfering with the rights of those employees who have chosen this offer of the employer to form workplace agreements could amount to a violation of the freedom of association as specified under the Act, by in effect, refusing to allow the workers to withdraw from the Union and negotiate their own terms.