Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The author states that to reconcile the differences of the many rating scales, a balanced manner of examining the different factors that makes up an evidenced-based practice more understandable for the stakeholders that it is practically made for is given particular attention. The said balance of attention is focused on the credibility of the practice.
Fiona Bookman writes in Understanding Homicide that there exist widely held beliefs among criminologists about the nature and morality of women with regard to the nurturing role of a woman as a wife and a mother. Feminity and womanhood are generally associated with an absence of criminality, and women are universally judged on the basis of these virtues.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Felix S. Cohen writes, "Property depends upon exclusion by law from interference," identifying the right of exclusion as an essential characteristic of property rights. Thus, an individual’s proprietary interest will depend on his ability, as accorded by law, to dispose of his property as he sees fit and prevent others from enjoying or utilizing it
“Disability is the loss or limitation of opportunities to take part in the normal life of the community on an equal level with others due to physical and social barriers” (Mittler and Mittler, 1994. p. 5). Since the 1960s disability has become an important issue for politicians the world over. The Chronically Sick and Disabled Person’s Act 1970 of the United Kingdom ensured better services for disabled persons.
Crime, violence, and anti-social behaviour are apparently high on the government agenda in recent years. In July 2004, marking the end of what Tony Blair describes as ‘1960s liberal, social consensus on law and order’ the Home Office launched a 5-year plan to fight crime and anti-social behaviour, with the aim of reducing crime to 15%
The author states that technically, Edward Sherman does not appear to be in any trouble. His agent, V.R. Brokers’ principal, Robert Renault, conveys Sherman’s decision to cancel the counteroffer to Lyon just before Lyon could hand over the counteroffer, signed and accepted by him, to Renault.
Doyle advised, “Linda Doyle was quoted in the November issue of CFO magazine advising CFOs not to treat noncompete agreements lightly because all too often they are not appreciated in terms of enforceability.” This brings us to your matter and the question of the enforceability of the verbal agreement.
According to the author, the Terry V Ohio case took place when a police officer stopped and checked three men because of their suspicious behavior. Occurring on October 31st 1963 when an experienced and old member of the Cleveland Police Department, Martin Macfadden, went patrolling downtown and saw two individuals acting suspiciously.
The police to show the people and the government that they found the culprits have framed charges on the three teenagers and accused them of murdering the three boys based on Satanism and the satanic cult involved. Police suspected the three teenagers merely based on the items found in the three teenagers' heavy metal T-shirts.
The paper is focussing on the steps which should be taken by an employer in dismissing an employee in a just and also fair manner. First and foremost the employee is given an improvement note if his performance is unsatisfactory and he is also not meeting the expected standards from the employer.
6 pages (1500 words)
, Download 2
, Research Paper
Free
The Court may also award damages. While in conventional international relations discourse, states are the only political bodies awarded with acting powers in international law, the European Convention on Human Rights was the first to give to the individual the privilege of participating in international relations.
The author states that the fast development of electronic data storage in the last quarter of the twentieth century has caused what might be called a ‘data explosion’ in almost every area of public and private life. This is indeed true of crime and justice, most visibly in law enforcement, where the use of information has always been ‘core business’.
The decision to enter the European Union was made by Turkey in 1963. Forty-two years passed but there were not any considerable changes made in order to join the biggest European confederation. Turkey only remains to be a potential member and guest in the future program of European Union expansion.
The deaths of many civilians and targeted bombings of civilian areas and destruction of homes in Mespotistan despite the fact that there were no claimed WMD in the surrounding areas could be considered as evidence suggesting the abuse of power and the intentional harm and targeted malice leading to homicide of the Mespotistanis.
A particularly interesting area covered by the law is that of trademarks, designed and used for the branding and advertising of a particular company, product, or idea. Here we will look at basic trademark law as defined under the Trade Marks Act 1994, and come to a better understanding of why such descriptors were not permissible as trademarks.
Contracts need to be drafted with due care and caution by experts in the field as well as with legal advice. While malafide intent is not time-constrained and may arise even after a lapse of a long period, disputes could be adjudicated by applying the principle of reasonableness. Reasonablenes have to be assessed by the Judge.
5 pages (1250 words)
, Download 2
, Literature review
Free
It can also mean the cognitive process whereby two or more stimuli are well-known. Discrimination usually consists of one or more of the following; People who are treated differently based upon their sex, race, color, nationality, ethnic or national origins, marital status, religion, sexual orientation.
The matter of Papera Traders Co Ltd & Ors V (1) Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd (2) Keihin Co Ltd Sub Nom Eurasian Dream (2002) supports the argument regarding Cargolines’ liability. In this case, the cargo owners sued the carrier following the occurrence of a fire that destroyed the cargo and rendered the vessel a total loss.
The author states that the Supreme Court, in the case of Texas v. Brown established the three-pronged test to determine whether or not the plain view doctrine is applicable, and this will impact on the admissibility in court of the evidence itself. The Fourth Amendment contains crystallized principles to guard against State encroachment.
Mandy had been employed since May 2004, as a secretary, at the University of West Mercia. For the past six months, she had been suffering from pain in her right hand and had lost a considerable degree of mobility in her wrist and hand. A medical specialist informed her that this injury had been caused by the constant use of word processing equipment at work.
6 pages (1628 words)
, Download 2
, Research Proposal
Free
It is necessary at the outset to understand the meaning of the term ‘burglary’ in its current context. The action of breaking into the edifice or premises of another person is generally called burglary. The motive for the action is to commit a felony - steal, rape, or murder. Thus the very act of trespassing into the house of another person with the intent to commit a crime is called burglary, whether any offense is committed or not.
These occurred between the years of 2001-2002 but the criminal acts went on years before hand. Some of those involved in this scandal included: World Com, Global Crossing, Adelphia, and Tyco (Friedrich 2004). The best possible way to develop an understanding of these crimes is through utilizing a specific criminological theory to define them (Friedrich 2004).
There appears to be an intention to target Mr. Bevin, who happens to be old by reason of his being a retired school teacher. You can again add this to the fact that the small print in the offer is alleged to have not been understood by Bevin. Under the law, a man has the constitutional right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
Since by moving the probe court through their power of attorney holders, they can access the bank accounts of the Nicky and Lydia, it may not be difficult for the trustees for life to meet the expenses arising out of repairs to the roof skylight besides the commitments mentioned above arising as a charge on the estate of Nicky Gray.
In 1995, Ann, Brenda, and Claire, all in their early twenties, decide to pool their resources to buy a house together in order to get on the ‘property ladder. The freehold of a house was bought and registered in the joint names of the three of them. But there was no declaration of the beneficial interests that they were to hold.
While the criminal laws are apparently neutral and the criminal justice system is explicitly based on the notion and promise of equality before law, the administration and enforcement of these laws are vitally and pervasively biased against minorities. According to the report the "massively and pervasively biased" treatment of blacks and Hispanics by the US police and courts is the major civil rights problem that America face in the twenty-first century.
Till the beginning of the twentieth century, the death penalty was used with decreasing frequency and was restricted, in practice and sometimes in the statutes, to fewer and fewer crimes (Colson 1997). Many of the significant changes in fact took effect without alterations in the penal code, as when states ceased to demand the death penalty for some capital crimes, like sodomy or adultery.
Terrorism Act 2000 which came into force on 19th February 2001 was subjected to wider debate even from the date of its introduction sometime earlier. Traditionally the control, monitoring and tracking down of terrorism in the UK was subjected to almost all the legislation. This situation was changed to one that depends exclusively on the definition of the term ‘terrorism’ as laid out in the Terrorism Act, 2000.
The treaty of Rome declared the EU an area without borders for people who wanted to look for work in countries in the EU. The single European Act of 1986 bettered the treaty of Rome in that it gave every citizen of the EU the to move around EU countries without visas and checkpoints were soon removed after this treaty.
On the contrary, the classical school of criminology, the most prominent member of which is Caesar Beccaria shared the idea that criminal behavior could be understood and controlled as 'an outcome of a 'human nature' shared by all the people. [Beccaria, 1764]
The state of unemployment can be attributed to many factors, external or internal. External factors come into existence with the low growth rate, falling GDPs (Okun’s Law states that for every 2% fall in GDP, the unemployment rate goes up by 1 %), declining job sectors, deflation in the economy, slashing jobs or job cuts whereas internal factors can be attributed to person’s own incapability to find a job due to lack of experience, skills, etc.
Take the other side of the story. What if Georgio has an online virtual world presence? Now, this is a new presumption that needs to be discussed. What if he opened a business within Second Life. This would strengthen his right then be able to protect his trademark Georgio and the economic justification for this would be simple.
This is however subject to the requirement that the said Deed has complied with all the legal formalities for the transfer. Hence, the house "Gatesgarth" is no longer subject to the free disposal of Grant at the time of his death. If Grant really intended to give the house to David, he could have revoked or rescinded the Deed of Transfer earlier made by him in favor of Polly so as to give effect to the provision of his will giving the same house to David.
Any food business operator charged under the Section 8, 14 or 15 of the Food and Safety Act, 1990, who neither prepared the food product pertaining to which one is being indicted nor was responsible for importing it in the UK has to satisfy some basic credentials for resorting to the defence of due diligence (Food and Safety Act, 1990).
The question of why the individual should obey the law is a central dilemma in any society. Most individuals have impulses that, if succumbed to, would cause them to break the law and yet most people, most of the time tend to obey the law even when the likelihood of being caught is small. This paper will consider both why we should obey the law and why, much of the time, we do obey the law.
The author states that in 1934 Lord Wright said in Lochgelly Iron and Coal Co v McMullan that in strict legal analysis, negligence means more than heedless or careless conduct, whether in omission or commission: it properly connotes the complex concept of duty, breach, and damage thereby suffered by the person to whom the duty was owing.
Unlike the case of State vs. Nagami, regional travel within the most European communities, including States U and V, is a right for nationals of Member States in the European Community by virtue of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, especially for Angie’s case where she is employed and studies at State U.
There is a sharp division in the manner laws are enacted and applied in the UK. Nonetheless, there is a perceptible preference for increased surveillance and other security measures. This situation is not unique to the UK alone. The world is caught in a catch-22 situation where the governments are in a tight corner.
All matters that pertain to the justice and security status of the United States should be referred and confirmed within the United States Constitution, which only implies that all processes made for the State’s justice system and security status should be executed within the bounds of the law following certain procedures and methods necessary for the preservation of the rights of the people.
The question raises some issues from a contract of illegality, unconscionable conduct, undue influence, economic duress, and misrepresentation. Here the main function will be to advise Clarence and Ginger whether they have claims for damages arising out of the above scenario, and if so, what the likely outcome of such claim is likely to be.
For several years now, there had been many court cases in which the jury trial was questioned, in the United Kingdom, United States, and elsewhere. Shadows of doubt, shady and apparent, were presented against these deliberations, decisions, and votes, but it is still used and trusted by the public in determining the guilt of persons charged with a criminal offense.
Wearing seat belts and/or helmets are reported to save lives but this in itself is of much controversy as will be discussed further. Some would argue that along with the privilege to operate a vehicle, a responsibility to obey all rules set forth by lawmakers necessarily follows and that helmet and seat belt laws are not considered victimless.
No other country can match the health and productivity of its economy, the extent of its scientific and technological resources, its ability to sustain massive levels of defense spending, or the power, sophistication, and global reach of its armed forces.
Nationality is a relationship between a person and their state of origin, culture, association, affiliation and/or loyalty. The law of nationality is related to two terms jus soli and jus sanguinis i.e nationality is established at birth by a child's place of birth or bloodline.
4 pages (1000 words)
, Download 3
, Personal Statement
I arrived at the station at 1730 Friday night (date) so I could observe a full twelve hour shift. I was assigned to ride along with two veteran patrol officers, Schmidt and Grebel. Schimdt had been an officer for twenty seven years and Grebel had been on the force for ten years.
Article 308 provides that where there is no power for the council, it can act only on a decision by unanimous voting.1.
As per Article 67 (1) there shall be unanimous decision in respect of any proposal during the transitional period of five years following the treaty of Amsterdam.
A dissenting opinion was written by Justice Rehnquist. He was troubled by the underlying facts of the case. He felt that Roe had not demonstrated legal standing, because there was no evidence of the stage of her pregnancy when she initially filed the complaint, and because he did not interpret the constitution as possessing a privacy right in these circumstances.
The set of facts are examined in a court of law and a conclusion is drawn based on them. When the facts are unique and have not previously been examined in a court of law, a precedent is set. When it is so, any other case from that point on with similar or identical facts is ruled on based on the ruling applied to the initial case.
It has also been said that Foakes and Williams should have been decided on special facts and merits on the basis that the practical benefit to the creditor arising from the agreement, in that case, was not proved to the satisfaction of the court. McKendrick has expressed the view that although the case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls Ltd. [
The author states that there are several ways in which this may be achieved. In this case scenario, one way is to demonstrate Ralph’s general reputation for truth and veracity to be bad, but not by particular acts. Here, because the proceedings are criminal in nature, we would be dealing with the federal rules of evidence.