Terry V Ohio - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In this paper “Terry V Ohio case” the author examines the case which was brought to the US Supreme Court in which they decided that unreasonable searches were not against the 4 Amendment when this act was carried out by a police officer who felt it his responsibility to check a suspicious individual…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Terry V Ohio case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Terry V Ohio"

Download file to see previous pages The detective observed John Terry and Richard Chilton standing on a street corner. They were seen walking back and forth alternately using the same route and stopping to stare at a store in the street. This was done five or six times by each individual leading to a walk up and down the street about twelve times. Each time this walk was over they would pause and talk to each other. During one of these trips in front of the store, a third man joined the two and spoke to them for a brief period before leaving. Identified as Katz, the detective felt this was a set-up for holding up the store, especially when all three individuals rejoined a few blocks away from the store. McFadden then went up to the three men and asked them their names. They were unable to give an answer which created further suspicion in the officer’s mind. The officer quickly reached out to pat the clothes of one of these men during which he came upon a gun in Terry’s overcoat pocket. Reaching inside to remove the gun, McFadden was unable to grasp it and take it out. Thus, he asked Terry to remove the coat itself. This allowed him to take out the revolver. Ordering the men to face the wall with their arms raised the officer was able to check the clothing of the other two men: Katz and Chilton. Chilton too was found carrying a gun. During the pat-down the officer had not been able to find anything on Katz which is why the outer garments of this individual were not checked. Terry and Chilton had been given the same pat-down but upon discovering the weapons., the officer put his hands under their garments to remove the guns. Taking the three men with him to the police station, they were charged with carrying concealed weapons.
The defendants of these three individuals then used the seizure and search of the weapons as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights in the United States constitution and protects individuals from irrational seizures and searches. According to this amendment a search warrant has to present to the individual before they can be checked otherwise it will be abusing the law. This warrant also has to be presented by a court that must be given proper reason for its issuing. The importance of this warrant is such that anyone who disobeys it or gives it for an unreasonable cause will also be held accountable in court Thus, under this view the defendants presented their clients as being wrongfully abused by the law.
Chief Justice Warren presided over this case and began with the principles established in the Fourth Amendment. The first was that the Fourth Amendment was responsible for protecting people, rather than places and thus gave as much protection to the citizen on the street as to the one at home (Legal Information Institute). Thus, the Court now had to decide whether it was illegal for the officer to check these men without warrant.
The problem that arose was the idea of stop and frisk which had occasionally been used by police officers to check suspicious individuals. The problem was that giving the officers so much power without a legal justification could lead to violation of personal security and abuse of authority. The police officers felt that this move was necessary to prevent situations could become dangerous and this stop ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Terry V Ohio case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Terry V Ohio case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1514867-terry-v-ohio-case
(Terry V Ohio Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Terry V Ohio Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1514867-terry-v-ohio-case.
“Terry V Ohio Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1514867-terry-v-ohio-case.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio

...? Case Brief: Terry v. Ohio of the of the For many years now, Police in the United s have engaged in investigative practices which are commonly known as ‘Stop and Frisk’. This process normally involves the stopping of a person or vehicle with the purpose of interrogation or a brief investigation. This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner)

...due Case Briefs CASE TERRY V OHIO. CITATION: 392 U.S 1968) FACTS Mr Mc Fadden, a Cleveland detective on duty observed two unknown men Terry and Chilton on a street corner. He noticed that the two men were observing a store window which they walked past roughly 24 times with the two men meeting on completion of each walk. They were joined by another man, Kartz, who left the two abruptly. Mc Fadden became suspicious and decided to follow them. The two men linked up with Kartz at a different store (Zucker’s). Mr Mc Fadden approached them, identified himself and subsequently enquired about their names. The three men were incoherent in their...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief

...?Terry v. Ohio Case Brief The short of Terry v. Ohio can be explained as the U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the 4th amendment prohibition pertaining to unreasonable search and seizures. The decision of the court states that the 4th Amendment right is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect in the street and proceeds to frisk him even though there is no visible probably cause to arrest the person. Rather, the act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous....
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Terry vs ohio

...and Introduction Cases of violence, robbery and general crime have drastically reduced in some US states, thanks to terry stops. In the US, terry stop law has been passed in twenty four states. This law states that a law enforcement officer has a right to stop a person, question them , frisk and detain them if need be, even without a search warrant, on grounds of suspicion and hunches that the person may be carrying weapons or is planning on attacking people.1 Research shows that before the Terry vs. Ohio case, which led to terry stops, in a span of seven years, 335 law enforcement officers, had been killed. In addition,...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Mapp v. Ohio

...Mapp versus Ohio Introduction Mapp versus Ohio was the criminal case during which the United s Supreme Court put into law that evidence obtainedin violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be used in state or federal courts (Stephens, 2006). Therefore, the only evidence that would be deemed appropriate and therefore usable had to have been obtained while adhering to the Fourth Amendment. This also means that the search cannot be undergone without the proper permission of authorities; no public servant can force their way into a home without the appropriate search warrant (Hubbart, 2005). Background In 1957, it was believed by the Cleveland Police Department that Dollree Mapp and her...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Terry v. Ohio

...Stop and an Arrest Stop and an Arrest In Terry v. Ohio, court laid down the rules in order to distinguish between a stop and an arrest. Even though there are confusions and issues, the following four factors lead to clear distinction between a stop and an arrest: Duration If the investigation is for a very short period of time, then it is considered to be a stop. A short duration would mean that the offices takes enough time to address basic questions such as name, personal details, address, personal identification proof, etc. If the investigation takes longer time than that is needed to address basic questions, then it is considered an arrest (Worrall & Hemmens, 2005). Purpose The...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Terry v Ohio Stop Question Frisk

.... In such circumstances, police officers may conduct a reasonable search of the individual for weapons. This investigatory power exists independent of whether or not there is probable cause for affecting an arrest or whether or not the officers in question are entirely sure that the person is actually armed and dangerous (Terry v Ohio 1968). The US Supreme Court defined the circumstances in which a stop, question and frisk would not exceed the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment. First, while warrants for search and seizure are the preferred way, there are times where police officers must act quickly and in such a case a stop and frisk may be appropriate. Secondly,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Mapp v. Ohio court case

...Mapp v. Ohio court case First Mapp v. Ohio court case In May, 1957, while in the of investigating a bombing that happened at a Cleveland home of Don King, three police officers visited the home of Doltree Mapp, who after calling her lawyers, asked that they produce a warrant which they did not have at the time of the first visit. They came back letter brandishing a document which they purported to be a warrant and, after manhandling Ms. Mapp they searched her house but found nothing relatedto the bombing. Instead they found some pornographic books and sketches. Despite her protestations that the materials did not belong to her but were...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Mapp V. Ohio

...Mapp v. Ohio of the Law of the Concerned September 3, Mapp v. Ohio There is no denying the fact that Mapp v. Ohio tends to be a landmark Supreme Court case that influenced the inclusion and acceptance of evidence in the State Courts. On May 23, 1957, the Cleveland Police believing that Dollree Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, tried to search her home without soliciting a search warrant. To begin with, Mapp was able to resist the entry of the officers in her premises. However, later on the Police managed to force its way into Mapp’s premises, again without a valid search warrant. Though the police failed to find the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Wolf v. Colorado & Terry v. Ohio Case

...Wolf V. Colorado And Terry V. Ohio Case Wolf V. Colorado, 388 U.S. 25 When a court is faced with a case deemed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and State law through search and seizure by police of individuals,when deciding whether they crossed the federal constitutional line;the United States Supreme Court takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment’s enactment and current state practices.In this regard when interpreting the Fourth Amendment,the court in defining the scope of Federal protection both trusts and mistrusts modern...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Terry V Ohio case for FREE!

Contact Us