Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The Act is also intended, amongst many other new regulations, to prevent marriages of immigration convenience. Those asylum seekers that fail to be admitted into the country but who cannot be immediately deported are also forced to take part in some form of employment in order to pay for their own sustenance and housing until they depart (Stansfield, 2005).
The development of novel categories of negligence should proceed incrementally and by analogy with decided cases. As there were n such close analogies, the court should proceed with great care before holding liable in negligence those who have been charged by Parliament with the task of protecting society from the wrongdoing of others.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Both countries have decent human rights records that have met minimal international standards. However, after weighing and assessing the relative merits of the two regarding human rights structures and enforcement, I would choose the Netherlands
Advances in communications and transportation, as well as increases in international trade and economic relations, have contributed to the development of a global drug network. Over the past 20 years, the trafficking of illegal drugs has undergone significant change with both the production and consumption of drugs reflecting global economic realities.
The paper will present issues related to which crimes terrorists can be charged with, how defendants who commit crimes in other countries can be charged in the United States, and how we can prevent terrorism both inside and outside the United States. The agencies of the federal government define terrorism in several different ways.
The author states that administrative agencies and policymakers are adjunct to the US legal system but technically not a part of it. In that case, it would depend on the realms of influence the administrative agency had. Similarly, the FBI has limited legal authority as well, as it can enforce only national laws.
If the term diversity is considered in а very simplistic wаy, then diversity cаn be seen аll аround us, by the cаrs we drive, the clothes we weаr, the different diаlects we speаk etc. While this mаy be а very generаl wаy of looking аt the term diversity, there is а considerаble grаin of truth to this stаtement.
Equity to the layman means fairness and justice, but in the legal context, its meaning is much more strictly defined. There are rules of equity; it must obey the rules of precedent as does the common law1. Though the foundation of the equity can be traced back to the Norman Conquest (1066), its impact today remains as strong as ever.
The report will cover the following: center for sex offender management; cyber-predators; female sex offenders; juvenile sex offender research bibliography; Michigan’s criminal justice response to incidents of rape; child prostitution; commercial sexual exploitation; child sexual abuse’ compendium of OJP-sponsored projects related to sex offenders.
Youth is considered one of the most important members of society because they form the active strata of the population which is considered a potent force with the capabilities to take the nations to new heights. The youth must be nurtured so they can be developed as positive and constructive members of society.
In order to answer both questions, and consequently determine whether the aforementioned statement correctly describes the legal situation, this essay will first describe the concept of nullity of a company by describing the concept, determining the legal entity that it refers to, and determining the effect that the concept will have on such entity
The government’s preference at the moment seems to be PPIs (public-private initiatives). This entails the government using private companies and private finance to carry out the work (e.g. building a school or hospital) and maintaining it for a set period οf time. Some say that this is gaining good value for public money.
Of course one of the problems inherent within a jury trial, which is also one of its virtues when looked at in a different way is the fact that their decision nearly always needs to be unanimous. Some degree of compromise of original decision and persuasion regarding the final verdict is an inevitable part of the process.
The film ends with Ike and Tina confronting each other right before a big show of Tina’s at the Ritz. Ike actually pulls out a gun but wasn’t able to harm her, after which the diva proceeded to go on stage and sand her monumental song which is also the title of the biographical film. Just by bravely stepping up against a seriously troubled offender, it goes to show that if the law or anyone else cannot execute your rights, only you can.
Corporate manslaughter refers to an act of homicide committed by a company. The Court of Appeal in one of the cases of the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster which took place in March 1987 confirmed that a company can in principle commit manslaughter (Corporate Manslaughter, 2006). A company can be held responsible for committing such a crime.
Rocky (the "doctor") for professional negligence; and (4) the hospital under the principle of vicarious liability. Driver's Duty of Care and Breach. In Nettleship v. Weston1, citing Glasgow Corporation v. Muir2 it was ruled that "if a driver goes off the road onto the pavement and injures a pedestrian, or damages property, he is prima facie liable.
From the above facts discussed in the case, it can be noted that this is a very challenging case. As much as he may have an e-resource of law and be awarded damages, much of the proof relies on him. On the other side, the defendants also have a lot argue in the case and the plaintiffs must therefore find out on how to overcome such defenses.
This study, therefore, attempts to analyze the principles behind the court’s exercise of discretion. The policy behind the law as well as the reasons behind the grant of discretion to the judge shall be examined and understood in light of the recent development of jurisprudence on this aspect of remedial law.
First, let us define crime and victimization: Legally crime is defined as an act proscribed by the criminal law and is punishable through the criminal justice system. In our everyday life, we encounter various kinds of crimes like murder, rape, assault, theft, and robbery, to the lesser misdemeanors like driving above the speed limit or driving with excess alcohol, etc.
The acts of the members of Christian for Life in yelling out "Murderers!" and of splashing ketchup to the members of the Birth Choices, Inc., are defamatory and tends to invite a violent reaction by the latter group. Thus, the speech and the act were not a healthy exercise of freedom of speech and are not protected under the First Amendment.
Intentions mean the state of mind desiring to do something, it may be positive intention or negative intention. An intention to save a person is a positive intention and an intention to kill a person is a negative intention. The positive intent state of mind results in positive activities the negative intent of mind leads to negative activities.
In conclusion, the idea will be fully comprehensible as to how certain cases receive what benefits and services as well as why they do. Also included in the conclusion is a finality point emphasizing that social services can have positive impacts or negative impacts on the social lives of those who live with disabilities.
This Act of parliament made provisions for codes of practice for the exercise of these powers with the primary aim of balancing the powers of the police and the rights of the members of the public.
Since common law has its basis in judicial decisions and precedents which has formed the bedrock of the British legal system, certain rights are conferred on the police to ensure that these laws are not breached.
The French authorities wish to deport Derek and his family back to Britain. Here it will be important to consider the rights of the European Union citizens though before doing that it is perhaps important to consider whether the actions complained of by the French authorities are legally objectionable, or otherwise.
It is beyond doubt that the public sector will have to evolve and change to meet the needs of modern society. However, reform can happen only when there is management will and capacity to implement them. In order to ensure the success of the modernization of the public sector reform process, involving the employees is very important.
Since Robert is the heir of the covenantor for the retaining wall, of which a real covenant is assumed to have been committed, he is obliged to maintain the wall, and as such, John may invoke this covenant in order to protect his property from damages that may arise due to the collapse or destruction of the retaining wall located in Robert’s property.
The determination and consistency with which the principle of freedom of the seas has been asserted is testimony to its central importance in the history of American foreign policy. It represents the effort to extend American notions of international law and universal human rights to the oceans of the world.
It was known to the contractor that he did not comply with the conditions of the contract regarding the completion of the work. In spite of that, they stopped the delivery of the work, and instead of making liable the subcontractor N he tried to recover the loss and damage caused to him by the N from the employer E.
The claim that direct communication undermines judicial impartiality and independence can be swiftly rejected, compared with Dutch effective mechanisms of communication i.e. press judges. The application of article 10 of the ECHR can automatically limit the media’s freedom of speech if the reports become too abusive.
The author states that the rods were indeed shipped on 10th September 2008 on board The Samba Carnival a ship chartered by Amazona Ltd from the shipowner, Pacific Liners Inc., and Segal had prepared a bill of lading for the Master of the Samba Carnival to sign but unfortunately the date was incorrectly recorded as 11th September 2008.
A contract is an agreement enforceable by law. A contract is made between two or more independent legal entities, by which rights are acquired by one or more, to act on the part of the other. It creates and defines obligations between the parties to the contract. All agreements are not necessarily enforceable by law, e.g. an agreement to build a house is a contract enforceable by law.
The third is fraudulent trading. This is laid down by section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and provides that if any director trades or carries out business with the intent of defrauding the creditors of the company or the creditors of any other person or for a fraudulent purpose, they can be held personally liable for the debts of the company.
It is to be understood therefore that when there is already a meeting of the minds between the buyer and the seller, the sale as a contract is perfected at once. To illustrate, A tells B that the former is offering to sell his Austin car to the latter for ten thousand pounds. The sale between A and B has been perfected because the parties by then have intended.
Companies take loans from banks and other financial institutions mainly at the start of the business as start-up capital or when it plans expansion and diversification. Banks consider various factors before loaning out to companies. There are certain basic things to be followed when considering commercial loans.
In both sets of circumstances, there is the power of choice between two alternatives, but one of those alternatives is so disagreeable that even a serious infraction of the criminal law seems preferable. In both circumstances, the consequence of the act is intended within any permissible definition of intention.
Nuisance is part of a class of torts that protect against harm to property. Specifically, nuisance is an injury caused by unreasonable interference with the use of land. It is closely related to the tort of trespass, which concerns the physical intrusion on the property of another.
Further, while there is a question of fiduciary relationship in the case of agency, this is not available in the case of franchising business where an agreed pre-determined percentage of earnings would be retained by the franchisee and the rest would have to be passed on to the franchisor. Frieda needs to consider all aspects, in terms of both benefits and costs before launching on her franchising business.
The research has pinpointed the fact that the role of a police officer is huge –multi-faceted as their main purpose is to help the citizens of the community, and at times this requires different roles for them to fill. It details that their role of maintaining order and keeping social control is emphasized the most and is shown to be consistent with what the majority of the public expects from the police force.
Two decades of rising crime led to a gradual erosion of public confidence in the institution and demanded the use of innovative practices to meet the requirements of society. While the American police adopted the ‘zero-tolerance approach that continued to trend toward the use of force to keep the streets clean, the British police, gravitated towards the more liberal approach.
Pursuant to Article 40 of the United States Convention on the Rights of the Child, the State recognizes the right of every child alleged as, accused of, adjudged, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child’s sense of dignity and worth, taking into account the child’s sense of dignity and worth, and the child’s age.
Matimak argued that the U.S. gave Hong Kong such recognition de facto, without formal acknowledgement, by entering into economic agreements with Hong Kong as though it were a sovereign state. Other cases where such de facto status was granted by the court, such as Murarka v. Bachrack Brothers, Inc., 215 F.2d 547.
In the formation οf contracts two elements are vital. Firstly, the "offer," is an indication by one person prepared to contract with another, on certain terms, which are fixed, or capable of being fixed at the time the offer is made.[1] Secondly, there must be an "acceptance", an unconditional assent to a definite offer.
The original 1957 Treaty spoke of creating ‘a common market’, but in the Single European Act of 1986, the term ‘internal market’ was substituted. This term is defined in what is now Article 14 EC, as an area without internal frontiers. Goods are products that can be valued in money and which are capable of forming the subject of commercial transactions.
A person will be liable for murder if he unlawfully kills a reasonable person who is in being under the Queen's Peace with the intention to kill [Moloney1, Cunningham 2, Vickers 3] or intention to cause grievous bodily harm. Murder is unlawful homicide committed with 'malice aforethought' with the penalty of mandatory life imprisonment.
Escobedo did not present the interrogating officers with any statement and he was released that same afternoon after his lawyer submitted a writ of habeas corpus in the state court suggesting that there was not enough evidence against his client. Based on the statement given by Benedict DiGerlando that it was Escobedo who had shot dead his brother-in-law.
Germany’s action is to be examined in the light of EEC Council Regulation No 3911/92 concerning the export of cultural goods outside a member state. The present regulation makes it mandatory to take an export license for the cultural goods to be exported outside the customs territory of the community.
International law, as it exists today, makes one question as to whether it has any real influence in impacting issues between states, related to war/peace, human rights, trade and even crime. This is because the interpretation and application of international law makes it so fluid, that it can be molded by any nation to suit its stand.
In an article retrieved online entitled “Writing a Position Paper”, it was stated that a position paper defends one side of an arguable opinion about an issue. The goal is to convince the reader that is this opinion that is the tenable one. In the position paper provided, the writer took pains to explain why his position is reasonable and valid. That is evident all throughout the work.
The instances of discrimination are unfortunately frequently encountered in our life. This type of social behavior that could lead to unfair treatment of a group of people on various grounds such as sex, religion, age, nationality, or social status is certainly not confined to European nations, rather it can be encountered everywhere.
While the labeling theory has been an important part of the ideas and research conducted in criminology, there are many other theories that have questioned its ability to describe and predict criminal behavior. In addition, there have been both good and bad things that have come from this perspective.