Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
On 31 August 2007, the Office of Fair Trading filed a claim before the High Court on the application of the law in respect of unauthorized overdraft charges. The claim relates to the issue of whether the fairness test in the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations (UTCCRs) applies to the relevant charges.
This is where the development of money laundering law takes the stage. Considerably, because of the emergence of financial crimes, it could not be denied that the more involved people are with their needs of earning money for their basic and their luxuries, the more they become vulnerable in making particular mistakes and crimes against financial gains.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
The House of Lords rejected the argument and held by a majority that the car belonged to Moorgate Mercantile Co for the reason that failure to register by Moorgate had not resulted in a representation that there was no H.P. agreement on the car and neither had they been negligent because there was no duty to register since registration was voluntary.
Indeed, as early as mid-1990’s criminal justice constituents such as law firms, independent lawyers, national agencies and law enforcement personnel have had an eye on emerging potentials of Internet and computer not only as tools for cost-effectiveness and performance enhancement but also as tools for wider community awareness and decision making.
A more jurisprudential analysis of the attitude of the courts would suggest the utilitarian approach of the achieving the greater good for the society as put forward by Mc Kee (2000) who believes that the good of the society is based on trial judges or juries returning fair verdicts after looking at all the evidence available.
11 pages (2750 words)
, Download 4
, Research Paper
Free
Basically, the law is contextual; as it is embedded in practice and institution, and takes its substance from existing patterns of human demeanor and relations (Jefferson Powell, 1993). To an equal degree, the law is influential, meant to proceed with the human good of those it serves, hence subject to variation to achieve this end.
It is the Company's intention to provide a safe and healthy working environment in accordance with the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974, the Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and all other relevant associated legislation and other requirements to which our Company subscribes. All injuries can be prevented.
15 pages (3750 words)
, Download 4
, Research Paper
Free
Gibson describes civil law as 'an action among persons (together real or legal, e.g. a company) regarding the enforcement of rights and the carrying out of pressure, by means of the meaning of compensate the upset party' and criminal law as 'the rules of common law and decree that make convinced actions by persons (real or legal) carrying a punishment of by the State'.
Generally, a firm named ‘Dodgy Developers” took up an urgently scheduled hall refurbishment work targeting a completion date of 1st December. Considering the urgency, they requested ‘Office Supplies’, their usual supplier, over the phone, for supplying the required workstations on or by 28th November.
It is necessary to add that adverse determination of medical necessity is experimental or investigational in nature.The necessity of health insurance companies as well as the adverse utilization review by them is getting momentum position in the recent days.
This proposal seeks to study the impact of price control on generics medicines on the pharmaceutical companies of the U.S. and how they should face the challenges to survive the impact. This proposal sets the outline for studying the impact of the U.S.
Each agency differs from the rest to some extent. NIU Police start at about $24.46 per hour and receive civil service benefits along with a collective bargaining agreement. The DeKalb City Police make about $33,000 per year on average which is 26% less than the national average. The DeKalb County Sherriff’s Deputies start at about $33,492 per year.
When viewed from the rational viewpoint of Singer's well-reasoned argument, it is clear that eating animals is unacceptable The only diet that supports our moral obligation to the world around us is vegetarianism.
This paper will show that meat is not a necessary food source.
The Articles of Confederation stated that in order to accept an amendment to them, the consent of the states should be unanimous, while the Constitution stated that if the representatives of the three fourth of the U.S states would grant their consent the amendment cold also be accepted.
Government mechanism based on the US Constitution, makes laws and it need to be implemented with its full capacity to keep its meaning as prescribed at the time of its creation. Hence it is the mandatory duty of the state mechanism and its law enforcement agencies to implement such enacted laws to the state as foreseen by the enactors.
It disregarded the many successes and lessons the League left for the forthcoming years to the international order, and the circumstances and global atmosphere under which was created and developed its activities. These circumstances certainly were not favourable (Benes (1929-1930): 212). However, the legacy of the League cannot be questioned.
In criminal law, the state is portrayed as the bigger offended party than the plaintiff such that if a defendant is proven guilty the state metes out the appropriate punishment. It is different in tort cases, in which the plaintiff, whose more popular assignation now is “claimant,” is the victim of the alleged wrong.
One of the most important issues is the fact that still there are no effective international bodies to monitor the application of international rules regarding the protection of human rights. Moreover, states around the world are likely to ignore the decision of these bodies related to the violation of specific human rights.
In order to give effective analysis to this question it is important to look at relevant Irish case law on this issue in order to determine whether or not such actions constitute a binding contract enforceable in law.
The following paragraphs delves in detail to the intricacies of these two very popular media topics.
A miscarriage occurs because of many situations that have given rise to such miscarriages(Choo, 1993). First, miscarriages occur whenever suspects or defendants or convicts are treated by the State in breach of their rights(Damaska, 1986).
But the point in case here is that the offer was made and accepted by the buyer. Had the seller wanted change in terms of payment, he should have rightfully approached the buyer and clarified it. (The very fact that the buyer again sent a letter which did not reach the seller is a different point to argue upon).
Asylum as defined in the encyclopedia “is the protection granted by a state to a foreign citizen against his own state”. This protection is based on certain refugee rights which are acknowledged internationally. It is granted to a person who cannot seek protection in his/her country of origin for fear of being persecuted for various reasons like race, religion, etc.
With the passing of time, the certain shortfalls may come to light. Dissatisfactions can arise because a piece of certain information was not disclosed by the previous owner deliberately or unintentionally. Hence, it is necessary to acquaint oneself with every detail about the property about to be purchased.
A lease has always been difficult to define and there is still no adequate definition. A lease of land involves both proprietary and contractual rights for both the landlord and the tenant. A tenant is the ‘owner’ of land, albeit temporarily and subject to restriction but equally he is a consumer contracting for the provision of ‘service’.
Undue influence and other forms of pressure can work for the equity’s intervention as seen in the case of Barton v Armstrong (1973) 47 ALJR 781 an agreement was attempted between a major shareholder and one of the directors. The director issued serious threats to the shareholder to force an agreement.
The lawyer has submitted its arguments with direct reference to the section 2 and 2(6) (b) which provide a defense to the convicted relation to a genuine document. Section 2(6)(b) has provided 'provide a defense in relation to a genuine document where the accused has traveled to and entered the United Kingdom using a false document', for which the defense counsel has referred to the provisions.
The job of a notary is to administer truthful oaths and declarations, draw factual powers of attorney, and attest to the authenticity of the signature, execution, and contents of documents, deeds, and contracts. This makes notaries the sole guardians of the integrity, veracity, and reliability of public documents.
The statistics indicate that a preponderance of the terrorism that targets the US comes from the Middle East, and it is a logical step to establish contacts among that population. The 1968 Supreme Court decision Terry v. Ohio found that it was allowable for law enforcement to detain and search suspects "when officers are acting upon reasonable suspicion that criminality is afoot".
“Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” per Alderson B, Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co (1856)
The author states that the most recent empirical data, as noted by Steiner, suggests that juvenile waiver cases no longer tend to result in shorter sentences or reductions in a time served; indeed, this recent research suggests that how a juvenile is disposed of in the adult criminal court depends quite heavily on the nature of the underlying crime.
The fact that payment or delivery of goods was not made to the buyer is immaterial. This was held in the case of Tarling v. Baxter. The plaintiff bought a haystack from the defendants. The haystack subsequently burned down and he sued the defendants. It was held that the buyer had to bear for the loss and was therefore required to pay the price.
Under the tenancy agreement, both the tenant and the owner are assigned certain rights and obligations, as par the law, which are binding on both and are at least equal to their statuary rights. If less, that clause of the agreement cannot be implied. There are two parts to the agreement: the express terms/clauses and the implied terms/clauses.
The common law will be applied only where it is impossible to choose between the parties to the litigation in accordance with the principle that where there is equal equity, the law shall prevail. Therefore, in a situation in which there is no clear distinction to be drawn between parties as to which of them has the better claim in equity, the common law principle which best fits the case is applied (Hudson, 2004, p.9).
Even as there is an increasing awareness of the financial, human, and social costs of corporate wrongdoings among academics, politicians, social activists, and the public, researchers suggest that there is also a growing appreciation of the difficulties with holding companies accountable for their wrongs.
The application of strict and proper norms and rules can certainly help eliminate this essentially unethical mode of practice on common grounds. Considering the importance of the important elements demanding control at the system level we held the focus of our attention to the system approach in preference.
The difference between the two is basically dependent on location and target—at home as opposed to abroad. This is a simplistic definition, but by trying to categorize these acts in a more detailed way, contradictions occur that make it difficult to define terrorism of any kind without setting forth a long list of possibilities.
For some, the law is a bulwark of stability and order – ever-unshakeable, created by assumptions and presumptions both tested and timeless. The study of legal history as an academic discipline, however, militates against this argument. Indeed, the law is infused with irresolvably opposed principles and ideals, and this legal indeterminacy, as it is called, compels the judge to make a choice that is not dictated by law.
The important factor to determine whether a person is or is not a director is to refer to the nature of the office and its duties. It does not matter by what name he is called. If he performs the functions of a director, he would be termed a director in the eyes of the law even though he may be named differently.
Audrey was paid a lower salary than her male colleagues. The employer justified this by stating that they had to incur additional expenditure, on account of insurance and other facilities, to be made available, solely to her at the workplace. This permits Northern Lights to pay Audrey a lesser amount.
Friedman M.R (2004). The contract is normally formed by letters between the solicitors on behalf of each of the seller and purchaser, called missives. Once all the terms of the contract are agreed upon, the missives are said to be concluded, and there is then a binding contract for the sale of the property.
USA Sports Law
As a legal counsel, I am more interested on the legal issues that surround this incident, more than the economical or social implications of the same. The following are the issues that are at play here:
If Sharman's father sues the club, he will be doing so under the "Professional Sports Torts Act" (Epstein, 2008).
In the case of a business that provides a service and not a product, such a mark is termed a service mark. These marks enable consumers to evaluate the quality of the products or the services by these marks. Besides this, the trademarks make the manufacturer responsible for the product. In the absence of these marks, substandard quality.
The breaking of the diamond worth £2,000 in her ring is an indirect loss that can be excluded if it fulfills the reasonableness. In the Ticket, there was a clause that stipulated that the company is not liable for any loss exceeding £100 per Item. She is not aware of the clause since all she knows is that there were some points on the ticket.
The author states that this was seen through the censorship of the print, radio, and television content. The reason for this move is largely political owing to the fact that the Communist Power of China is insecure about its political position and it would like to create a scenario in which the electorate is not aware of their democratic rights.
Electoral system factors have been important in maintaining Australian party identification levels. The frequency of elections (at least every three years for federal elections, plus state elections with the same parties involved), combined with compulsory voting, which keeps parties attentive regarding the interest of the voters.
The interest in the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court by President Barrack Obama garnered more than its share of scrutiny. However, there are some opinion that the hesitation stems from Sotomayor's gender and race being a Latina.
Understanding how commercial contract arbitration affects commerce on a global scale we must understand the rules behind arbitration. We must respect the language used as being a universally accepted communication in regard to these contracts. Arbitration is a method to provide neutrality, confidentiality, and a legal landscape.
Its impact is generally achieved by the literal rule, since Parliament clearly tends to enact its intention. If judges use a purposive approach, they are engaging in an essentially legislative function, which is a breach of the doctrine of the separation of powers.
The author explains that it was the first hospitalization for the woman and she had had a severe attack in the lower quadrant, in the same are, the last December. She has severe pain and a mass formed, in the area and had come to the hospital for a checkup and medication.
There are many other universal human rights instruments such as declarations that “have no binding legal effect, but….(wield) undeniable moral force and provide practical guidance to States in their conduct” as well as covenants and protocols that are “legally binding for those States that ratify or accede to them.” (OHCHR)