Nobody downloaded yet

Jury System of UK - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The concept of trial by jury is basic to most legal systems that are based upon the English legal system. The idea that a person should be tried by "a jury of his peers" rather than by a King, Judge or some either biased authority is one of the founding stones of democracy…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Jury System of UK
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Jury System of UK"

Download file to see previous pages But considering the complexity of many trials today - especially with the advances made in forensic science and the complexity of many civil trials, severe doubts regarding the efficacy of the jury system have been made.
First of all, it is correct to consider whether a jury can in fact be "objective", especially when there has been a lot of pretrial publicity. Many studies have documented adverse effects of pre-trial publicity on juror decision making (Linz & Penrod, 1992; Otto, Penrod & Dexter, 1994; Ogloff & Vidmar, 1994; Studebaker & Penrod, 1997). These studies point out that jurors do not exist in a vacuum and are likely to have some opinion of a well-known case before they enter the courtroom.
In many ways this can be linked to the ideas of groupthink. Just as the jury may be influenced by what the public outside supposedly 'thinks' regarding a case - usually influenced by the media - so as a whole they may come to conclusions based upon a kind of consensus feeling rather than rational thought. This type of situation has been called "groupthink". Janis Irving has created a perhaps more sober definition in which she describes groupthink as "a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action" (Irving, 1972). There are various interpretations and analyses of the practical results of groupthink that have occurred over the years.
In the original article in which the term groupthink was postulated, Whyte described group think in the following way:

We are not talking about mere instinctive conformity - it is, after all, a perennial failing of all mankind. What we are talking about is a rationalized conformity - an open, articulate philosophy which holds
that group values are not only expedient but right and good as well.
(Whyte, 1952) (emphasis added)

One way of improving jury decisions, and thus making them more reliable, would be to actively educate juries on the dangers of groupthink before a trial starts. Just as their knowledge of the case, predisposition towards certain verdicts, experience of this type of crime/action are often tested through the process of voir-dire, so juries could be taught in a short workshop on the problems of groupthink and how to avoid them before the trial begins.
There are various interpretations and analyses of the practical results of groupthink that have occurred over the years. Some, such as McCauley (1987) have concentrated on some of the more ominous sides of the tendency in which individuals may be swayed into ways of behaving that they would not otherwise consider.
For example, extreme cases of groupthink can often be found within various religious cults, sometimes leading to disastrous and tragic consequences such as the mass suicides at Jonestown or of the Heaven's Gate group. These are thankfully rare examples of an extreme example of groupthink in which what may be a powerful good is turned into a destructive negativity because of the pathological nature of those who are leading the groupthink.
Other cases of groupthink have been found within organizations of some of the most intellectual and highly educated people (who would not be expected to be easy 'followers' as were the mostly uneducated ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Jury System of UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Jury System of UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from
(Jury System of UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Jury System of UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words.
“Jury System of UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Advantages And Disadvantages Of The System Of Trial By Jury
The jury system in the UK is a unique feature: as it combines the common sense of a non-legal person with the procedure of the law to ensure that justice is served. Evidence of its existence is even found in Magna Carta 1215 where the right to be judged by one’s peers was recognized and arbitrary justice was condemned.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Evaluating the jury in the English legal system
Before proceeding further with the discussion on all the aspects mentioned in the previous paragraph,it would be of help in having a brief look at the jury,as it is seen in the English legal system.Jury Historically,the concept of jury has been there in the English legal system for nearly the past eight centuries.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained
Why trial by jury should be retained Contents. i. introduction ii. Facts and statistics on juries iii. Objectives of the review iv. How juries operate v. Jury verdict and theory vi. Key importance of juries vii. Conclusion viii. References i. Introduction The confidence of the public in the judicial process is paramount to ensuring an effective judicial system.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Thw Right To Elect Trial By Jury in Hong King
How far do you agree with the courts' decisions? Introduction The right to a trial by jury is described as a “unique institution” introduced by the Common Law of England and transported to its colonies during the colonial era (Vidmar, 2000, pp. 1-2). Indeed not only did the British colonies retain the jury systems after obtaining independence from the British colonies, but a number of other jurisdictions in Europe and elsewhere adopted some form of jury trial (Vidmar, 2000).
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Jury system of United States
People serving in jury system not only inspect the crime but also saves the citizen from these speculative criminals. They inspect and investigate crime not as jury server or inspectors but disguising in as a casual citizen. So jury servers may also know as protectors of citizens.
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
Where on one hand, this might protect the interests of the people in terms of unbiased judgment; on the contrary, it may also hinder racial diversity in the judicial system of the nation and hence, be termed as a practice of racial discrimination. Therefore, whether racial diversification should be promoted or prohibited through reforms in the US judicial system, the possible response to be obtained from the respondents and if these ideas are good or bad, is subjected to more in-depth understanding and critical evaluation of the present scenario.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the current jury system in the UK
The jury acts as a revelatory of the public’s feeling. Generally, the public has confidence in the jury system because it values public participation. For example, in R v Ponting for example, D, working as a civil servant, saw documents
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Analysis of A Jury of Her Peers
responding to Glaspell’s story, Showalter writes that there should be no need for special juries to preside trial in cases in which women are the defendants. The best defense, according to Showalter, should involve full revelation of the evidence in an open and transparent
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Affect Social Network and Technology in Our Life
As such, we are all coexisting with technology in one way or another as it has become a secondary basic requirement for survival. This dependence has developed into branched consequences; both positive and negative.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
Society and its Attraction to Jury Trial
Lately, despite the historical importance of the system of trial by jury, it has been facing a good deal of criticism. The detractors of the jury institution feel that this entire system is a form of solecism, leading to a waste of public funds, and exploited by criminals for their own benefit.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Jury System of UK for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us