Nobody downloaded yet

Jury Deliberation - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
For several years now, there had been many court cases of which the jury trial was questioned, in the United Kingdom, United States, and elsewhere. Shadows of doubt, shady and apparent, were presented against these deliberations, decisions, and votes, but it is still used and trusted by the public in determining guilt of persons charged with criminal offence.
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.2% of users find it useful
Jury Deliberation
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Jury Deliberation"

Download file to see previous pages "Research" in this instance could be wide and varied in meaning as there are other extrapolating questions with regards to jury deliberation itself. Are questions limited to the AC 1118 (protection of free debate in the jury room) only Are there other contradicting details about the jury process which the public must know and that should be properly acted upon Does "research" apply to the outsiders, or the jurors themselves
As Section 8(1) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 provides: "(1) Subject to subsection (2) below, it is a contempt of court to obtain, disclose or solicit any particulars of statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast by members of a jury in the course of their deliberations in any legal proceedings," making votes, discussions and other related issues on jury deliberations sacrosanct before the law.
In this instance, it is against the law that jurors themselves impart any information or knowledge with regards to the case at hand, so that they are to live life like the case does not exist at all. And this is to allow implementation of AC 1118, of which may be interpreted as to protect the jurors, or the court decision, and the public in general.
Court cases that have touched on the issue of "protection of free debate in the jury room" include Regina v. ...
ion why or how come that in those cases where the court was informed of some misconduct on the part of jurors, steps were not done to rectify what has gone wrong (UKP, 2006). In the R v Mirza (2004) case, AC 1118 was also indicated of important clause as an important feature of the jury's work protecting "individual jurors from exposure to pressure to explain the reasons which had actuated them individually to arrive at their verdict," (House of Lords, 2005). Likewise, R v Young Stephen (Bar Council, 2006) has also been mentioned as one of the most notorious case.
Incidentally, it was emphasized in a report that section 8 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 on disclosing or obtaining information relating to jury room deliberations were addressed to third parties (Procter, 2006) in the discussion mentioned.
One example of this contradictory deliberation was the case "Her Majesty's Attorney General (Respondent) v. Scotcher (Appellant) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) of which one Keith Scotcher has been charged of contempt of court.
In the deliberation, it was established that appellant Scotcher was summoned for jury service in January 2000 for a case against two brothers criminally charged. In February 20 of that same year, an anonymous letter was sent to the mother of the two defendants in the criminal case of which contents include among others:
"Dear Mrs Anderson
I was the one jury member who held out against the
prosecution case at the trial of [A] and [B]. I would like
you to seriously consider, as I'm sure you are already,
talking to your counsels about appealing the convictions
on the grounds of an unsafe conviction, miscarriage of
justice, or whatever. [XXXX]
When we first went out the voting was close XXXX.
Many changed their vote ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Jury Deliberation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Jury Deliberation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Jury Deliberation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Jury Deliberations
...? JURY DELIBERATIONS [School] Number] June 10, JURY DELIBERATIONS The first is a proposal to eliminate the requirement for a unanimous verdict of 12 jurors to make the majority of 9 of the 12 jurors sufficient to stand a verdict of guilty or not guilty in criminal cases, is constitutional and does not violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. In the case of Apodaca Vs. Oregon, the Supreme Court held that right of the accused to a jury trial does not necessarily require that 12 out of 12 unanimous votes in order to render the accused as guilty for the offense charged against him. The primordial consideration of a trial by jury is to...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
...? Jury Introduction The configuration of jurors in the American judicial system, with the inclusion of racial minorities, alongside other majority races, has attracted considerable attention among intellectuals. Correspondingly, arguments have been drawn both in favor and against the statement that the jury should be constructed with the members, excluding the jurors belonging to the race of the convict or the defendant. Where on one hand, this might protect the interests of the people in terms of unbiased judgment; on the contrary, it may also hinder racial diversity in the judicial system of the nation and hence, be termed as a practice of racial discrimination. Therefore, whether racial diversification...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Jury Nullification
...? Jury Nullification Introduction Jury nullification based on historical information and different cases so far arbitrated through this system, has prompted to the rise of numerous mixed reactions towards its operations among citizens. Mainly, this is despite the act of instituting it by respective state, for instance, Canada is to protect citizens’ rights from oppressive laws. This is by either upholding or disregarding accusations regarding infringements the accused said to have done like in the R. v. Morgentaler’s case whereby the cited law did not adequately apply (R. v. Morgentaler, 1988). However, this has always been the norm due to the de facto power granted to juries whereby...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study
Jury Decision-making
...the authenticity of DNA evidence had been proved, many judgements have been overturned and one such famous case is The Case of the Winchester Three, (1990) where three Irish people were sentenced for 25 years of imprisonment for the murder of Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Tom King. Eye witnesses had spotted them in the crime scene and they had money, a second hand car, a radio, a woolly hat, a list of prominent British people and also had false name driving licences. Jury relied on eye witness evidence and any reasonable jury could do so and in this case it eventually proved to be a miscarriage of justice. Even though it was not Actus reus, it was easy to convince the jury. ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Jury Selection
...1. Frederick, Jeffrey (1987). "The Psychology of the American Jury". The Michie Company, USA. The Psychology of the American Jury discusses the tough issues you face in jury trials and offers practical solutions. Among the issues discussed are the use of surveys in jury selection, in-court approaches to jury selection, nonverbal behavior of jurors, voir dire procedures, persuasion in the courtroom, focus groups, trial simulations, and shadow juries. It will prove to be useful especially for my first aim which determining how social psychology applied in the jury selection process by attorneys and/or juror consultants and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Runaway Jury
...I chose the movie Runaway Jury to demonstrate how public perception of the legal profession could be affected by movies. This movie was based on a book by John Grisham and the plot revolves around the jury trial of a major gun manufacturer. A lawsuit has been brought against the firm by the widow of a man killed by a gunshot in his place of work. Gene Hackman portrays the defense attorney, and Dustin Hoffman idealistically represents the widow in her claim. John Cusack plays one of the jurors, with an agenda of his own. Hackman's character is an attorney in this film, more specifically a "jury consultant". These individuals conduct a selection of jury-centered research programs designed to gather opinions, value-beliefs... , and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Movie Review
Jury Bias
...for the judges to make sound deliberations (Burns, 2006). In other words, during this phase there is reading of instructions on the law that governs the presented case. The last step entails deliberation whereby the case is considered in order to reach a verdict. First, the jury elects a foreperson to oversee the discussions in order to be performed in sensible and uniform style. In case of a question from the part of the jurors, it may be written down for the delivery of a bailiff to the judge. Finally, there is the reading of the verdict by verdict then dismissal of the jurors by the judge. In conclusion, it is crucial for the judiciary and the other organs that dispense justice to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Deliberation log
...Editorial: Drug testing welfare applicants nets little. March 18). USA Today. Retrieved from http testing-welfare-applicants/53620604/1 Central Claims Support (Premises & Evidence) Identify Values & Assumptions C1: With the help of drug tests for candidates who apply for a job position, legislators want to make sure that the funds of taxpayers are spent reasonably (11). C2: There is no opportunity for rehabilitation in the state’s welfare program (13). C1a: According to the claims of many government representatives, including Jerry Sonnenberg, welfare helps people have an access to illegal drugs (1). C1b: Currently, such states as Florida and Arizona make efforts... Drug...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Jury Nullification
...Jury Nullification The concept of jury nullification has proved to be a controversial one, based on its double standards. While it appears to match logic, by providing an avenue through which the jurors can apply their conscience to determine a case, oblivious of what the law or the instructions from the judges provides, it appears to be a loophole in the justice system, where the offenders can get away with their acts of crime, without being appropriately punished by the law. According to Professor Paul Butler, the defendants in victimless and non-violent cases have an avenue of being acquitted by the jurors, since they did not cause any harm to another party (Keneally, 942). However, this is observed...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Runaway Jury
...Runaway JuryJury Selection Process The movie d Runaway Jury is based on a court room trial in which a widow had filed a law suit against gun marketing and selling company for selling the gun that was used to kill her husband (Runaway Jury. 1). The movie depicts the procedure through which a jury for a trial by jury is selected. The movie provides in-depth details regarding the actual procedures but is not exactly based on how the jury is selected. In the movie, the gun manufacturer hires Fitch who has been assigned with the duty of ensuring that the jury that is selected does not rule in the favor of...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Jury Deliberation for FREE!
Contact Us