73 PROPERTY LAW QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED WITH 73 ANSWERS, ONE ANSWER FOR EACH QUESTION
73 pages
(18250 words)
, Download 2
, Essay
Since the lease was granted in 1998, it comes under the LTCA 1995 and hence, does not have to fulfill the requirements stipulate by Lord Oliver in Swift Investments v Combined English Stores etc (1989).... Moreover, even though the lease concerning the present scenario is legal,.... ... ... The act also does not distinguish between personal and proprietary covenants either, hence, it would not matter whether Emma was required to do paint Oliver's portrait or do s laundry, or pay the rent, the former being personal and the latter being proprietary, and the burden under the personal covenants would run with the land provided the assignment was NOT in contradiction of any of the covenant stipulations....