Nobody downloaded yet

Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Fourth Amendment: Searchers and Seizures Professor The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the privacy interest of citizens from unlawful governmental intrusion or unreasonable search and seize by the government…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures"

Download file to see previous pages The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states, The right of the people to secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated , and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.1 This provision that protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures goes back far into English history. In 1604, in the famous Semayne's Case, the Judge, Sir Edward Coke, first identified this right. He ruled that, "The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose." In this case, it was determined that subjects of the kingdom had the right to be protected from searches and seizures that were unlawfully conducted, even if they were conducted by the King's representatives. The case also recognized that lawfully conducted searches and seizures were acceptable. This case established a standard that has remained a part of English law ever since.2 The provisions clearly correlate to the constitutional guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life, rights and properties without due process of law. The right of the person to be protected from search and seizure is paramount and is a fundamental right of every citizen of the country except when there is probable cause that will compel the judiciary, upon oath of affirmation that something should be searched or be seized from a determinate place or from the identified person. There is probably cause when facts and circumstances warrant that a reasonable man perceived that an act is committed and the means for prosecuting it is lawful, just and proper.3 Thus, the existence of facts and circumstances would invite such reasonable belief, acting on the same with full knowledge of the prosecutor that a person being charged as guilty of a crime for which he was being subjected for prosecution.4 Such presupposed a reliable and competent proof that the person has committed specific acts or has done specific omissions which violate the statutes of criminal laws.5 Probable does not connote absolute certainty on the basis of the facts alleged based in the stipulations of the depositions however, it regarded the reasonableness on the conduct of search warrant on the bases of offense allegedly committed which provide justification of the issuance of search warrant.6 Such probable cause is however strengthened when there is prima facie evidence of a commission of a criminal offense, thus, violating rules and statutes and as such, prescribes for preliminary investigation.7 The Supreme Court likewise explicated that probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the police officer's knowledge provide a reasonably trustworthy basis for a man of reasonable caution to believe that a criminal offense has been committed or is about to take place.8 Probable cause can be established by statements made by reliable police informants. There is a prong test to validate the reliability behind these efforts of forming probable cause. However, probable cause will not lie where the only evidence of criminal activity is an officer's affirmation of suspicion or belief. 9 The court ruled that, The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Fourth Amendment: Searches and Seizures Research Paper)
“Fourth Amendment: Searches and Seizures Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures

Fourth Amendment

...? Fourth Amendment The two basic clauses of the Fourth Amendment of the United s constitution provide that The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated 2. No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Levy 1995, p. 162) The fourth amendment was adopted in response to the tendencies of police officers to abuse their search and seizure responsibilities during the colonial period. The enactment of the fourth amendment guarantees to every citizen “the security of privacy against arbitrary intrusion... by the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws

...?MID TERM ESSAY QUESTIONS 6RD February Midterm essay questions Introduction The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws governs criminal procedure that starts from seeking of warrants of searches, seizures, and arrest up to the judicial processes. This paper seeks to discuss legal issues in criminal procedure through exploring a case study. Question 1: Quality of evidence and arrest warrant Search or arrest warrants are given to law enforcement officers by a court. Sufficient evidence, that meets a threshold for probable cause, must however be given by the police. The first proof for sufficiency of evidence, according to the case of Maryland v Pringle, is the reliability of the source of information with respect to truthfulness... . The...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The fourth amendment and NYPD Surveillance

...of the constitutional bill of rights guarding against unreasonable seizures and searches, while requiring warrants to be sanctioned by courts of law, and being held up by showing probable cause. In 1968, the Supreme court, in its decision on the Terry vs. Ohio case, ruled that the detention of a man’s person and his subsequent search in the absence of a warrant, was not a violation of his fourth amendment rights, if the officer was acting on the reasonable belief grounded on suspicions that were objective. For example, that the man was holding a weapon, or was dangerous. This procedure, however, was used for racial profiling over the years, first with...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

An Analysis of the Fourth Amendment

... An Analysis of The Fourth Amendment The fourth amendment was a significant development of the American constitution, which spells out the limits of the executive in the manner in which it may carry out searches, seizures, or arrests on the citizenry. In principle, the fourth amendment is part of the Bill of Rights and works within the changed requirements on the conduct of arresting officers with regard to the privacies of the persons being apprehended or searched (McInnis 41). The central focus of the fourth amendment was addressed on specific details of the general warrant, which gave the authorities the sweeping powers to search suspected citizens with no limits on the nature of the items they could focus their searches... that affirm...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Searches and Seizures

...? Searches and Seizures Introduction Our system of law has firmly ingrained that searches that are conducted outside the judicial process and without any prior approval by a magistrate or judge are per se unreasonable (not permissible) under the Fourth Amendment though this is subject to only few established exceptions. The court has given a number of exceptions to warrant that is required including but not limited to searches of vehicles, consent searches and inventory searches. The Fourth Amendment of the US constitution provides for the right of the people to be secure...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Fourth amendment

... The Fourth Amendment was enacted to address issues that were very eminent during the colonial America and these issues involved the issuanceof searches without a cause or a warrant of arrest. The Fourth Amendment was meant to safeguard an individual from privacy violations in the form of seizures and searches of their properties. Since its enactment, rules have been made regarding the amendment and the most important rule is the warrant rule. Fourth Amendment History of the Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is a change that was made to the constitution of the United Sates of America and specifically relates to the bill of rights. The origin of the amendment can be traced to the efforts by the Americans to suppress disputes... the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

A Danger to Fourth Amendment Rights

...Unit Introduction The Fourth Amendment claims that people have the right to feel secure in their papers, houses, effects and papers, against any unreasonable seizures and searches, and shall not be violated unless upon a probable cause, supported by affirmation or an oath. This warrant should also describe the person, things or place to be searched or seized. This amendment also protects arbitrary freedom and the right to privacy. In Terry V Ohio(1962), the supreme court of United States, for the first time approved a seizure and a search based on less than probable cause. This created controversy, where...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Fourth Amendment forbids only unreasonable searches and seizures

...narcotics. Should the evidence be permitted for use against the defendant? The ultimate reason for the Officer searching the container in the car is to gather adequate evidence that prove the suspect illicit act. This stands out that, any evidence established would be worth to use against the defendant, and for further investigations of illegitimate act. In this case, the fourth amendment regards that, when under such circumstances, it is objectively sound for the officer to consider that the scope of the suspect’s approval authorized him to open the container in the Automobile (Legal professionals, 2012). In fact, it would be reasonable for the suspect to permit the Officer to open...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure

...Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment accords people the right against search and seizure that is unreasonable. The security against these unreasonable seizures and searches extends to people’s effects, houses and persons. Violation of this right requires a warrant that issued only with probable cause that requires the support of an affirmation or an oath. The amendment requires such a warrant to articulate the persons intended for searching and the items targeted for seizure. The provisions of this amendment imply the expectation of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights

.... The issue the case was whether the Fourth Amendment of U.S. constitution grants protection to individuals against unreasonable searches & seizures thus requiring police obtaining a search warrant to allow them to wiretap a public phone booth (Katz v. United States, 1967). Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Summary of the Case The Miranda v Arizona (1966) is a landmark case that represents the aspect of the criminal procedures and the due processes. The defendant in the case, Miranda was arrested by police at his home and taken to a police station where the accuser identified him before later being interrogated by police for a whole two hour period resulting to...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures for FREE!

Contact Us