Science and religion have been criticized for not providing an explanation to the recent development in cosmology and biology. The conflicting ideologies of science and religion are mystifying the cosmos. …
Download file to see previous pages...
It is fascinating that scientists are questioning religion while believers are questioning science. Scientists are coming up with explanations on the developments in cosmology and biology to counter explanations of religion. Concurrently, religious believers are opting to understand the universe based on their beliefs. Nevertheless, it is required that one has to understand science and religion to unravel the mysteries of nature and human existence. The recent developments in cosmology and biology suggest that science has a major role in explaining life and the universe. As such, scientific inventions are making people believe their capability in understanding the cosmos (Regan, Worthing & Australian Theological Forum, 2001). Research on cosmology has expanded human understanding on the happenings in the universe. Teleological concepts are being used to describe the cause of an action or an event. Hence, teleological judgments are weakening peoples’ faith in religion. For instance, the development of genetic science in biology suggests that technology influences most of the developments in current cosmology. This strengthens humans’ belief in science as opposed to religion. Human beings are beginning to understand the cosmos more than they did in the past (Regan, Worthing & Australian Theological Forum, 2001). ...
On the contrary, the current developments in cosmology confuse both scientists and spirituals around the globe (McGrath, 2010). Religious authorities and scientists have contradicting information concerning the forces that control the universe. For example, scientists are trying to explain natural phenomenon in scientifically. On the contrary, religious believers’ are perceiving events in the cosmos as spiritual happenings. Moreover, believers are claiming that a supernatural being is in control of such events. As evident in teleological explanations, biological developments suggest that nature is harmonious and everything happens for a cause. However, people are researching to understand the spiritual world more than the physical world (McGrath, 2010). This contributes to the confusion arising from debates in the past. Nowadays, it is easier for people to shift their belief from religion to the ideologies of science when scientifically explaining the developments of the cosmos. 2. Developments in evolutionary psychology and cognitive science Evolutionary psychology and cognitive science have led to the inventions in biological science. Understanding behavior through the science of cognition disputes some of the teachings of religion making it difficult for people to believe in religion. The assertion in evolutionary psychology is that behavior cannot be attributed to a specified cognition (McGrath, 2010). According to the theories of evolutionary science, the nervous system coordinates all human responses. This knowledge of evolutionary science has led to the development of experimental science (Mircea, 1963). The Darwinian theories that supported evolutionary psychology have falsified religion in various ways. Indeed, people have been made to believe
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
“...science and religion each have their own separate realms of expertise, and thus their own autonomy. "Each should possess its own principles, its pattern of procedures, its diversities of interpretation and its own conclusions."
Plantinga strongly asserted that there might be science and religion conflict as one may come to think of it, but he believes that there is actually a contradiction between naturalism and science and not on theistic religion and science (Dennett and Plantinga 10; American Philosophical Association Central Division Conference 1).
The relationship between religion and science is a contentious issue, particularly among scientists and theologians, both of whom have an inherent interest in clarifying the role that their professions play in the world. It is an important distinction to make; however, it is even more important to define what the distinction applies to exactly.
Truth behind religion is treated as universal and eternal, essentially a question of faith, and widely accepted and not challenged or questioned in general. In case of science, the authority is based on evidence and reasons.
Argumentative discussion of controversial issue of science and religion’s current conflict tend to emphasize the real factors that undermine each field’s reputation. This discussion will analyze some important details that brought the issue more controversial.
The author states that Boyle’s message is simple: that any conflict arising between reason and religion is simply due to the misinterpretations of the latter, for we are but humans who normally make mistakes. To Boyle, religion is never adversarial to religion only if we consider the points he elaborately mentioned in his text.
7). Tradition acknowledged the caste system as based on birth and the practice of nontraditional forms of technological developments in science would have significant effects on those who could avail or offer their services depending on the social strata or the main
of the universe, even if our universe is a piece of a multiverse, the multiverse itself might need to have an outright starting and speculative cosmologies attempt to test the Big Bang hypothesis, however none of them – regardless of the possibility that correct – can build
Science is based on physical or experimental evidence while religion is based on beliefs obtained from holistic readings.
One scientific discovery criticized for its religious appropriateness is human evolution. Science describes evolution as a way that man