Clash of science and religion - Essay Example

Conflict between Science and Religion Affiliation Conflict between Science and Religion The compatibility between science and religion is minimal. Numerous scientific discoveries have been cited as unethical by religion. The proneness to conflict between the two factors is prompted by the fact that the two forms of perception draw evidence from different sources (Geoffrey, 2011). Science is based on physical or experimental evidence while religion is based on beliefs obtained from holistic readings.

One scientific discovery criticized for its religious appropriateness is human evolution. Science describes evolution as a way that man developed from one animal species to his current form. On the other hand, the religious perspective of human evolution is based on the readings (Geoffrey, 2011). The readings develop the assumption that human beings are created by God. In addition, the creation of man is the most valuable creation of the deity. The discoveries of an evolution theory that can be explained through scientific evidence undermine the significance of the religious creation theory (Philip, 2009).

On numerous occasions, religious fanatics have questioned the originality of scientific theory citing that there must be a source of life. Consequently, this can only be explained by the existence of a supernatural power. The scientific discoveries that explain the existence of the universe also create conflict with religion. For instance, the continental drift theory does not value the importance of religion in the creation story (Philip, 2009). The theory is developed on the assumption that the world was a one piece of land mass that drifted due to cosmic activity.

The movements enable the creation of continents separated by seas. From a religious perspective, the complete format and existence of the universe was as constructed by God. Mathisen (2006) is of the assumption that religion perceives the continental drift theory as a way that undermines the significance of their deity. The author further points out that; religion increases its dissatisfaction on the theory every time a new discovery is attached to the theory (Mathisen, 2006). The modern day scientific discoveries also attract opposition from religion.

For instance, modern day scientists have dwelled so much on the creation of an artificial life-form. Over the years, discoveries on human robotics have been made to justify that man can develop a more complex form of human. McRae (2010) is of the assumption that creating an artificial human being is automatically perceived as act that provokes God. From a religious perspective, creation of an artificial human is the worst form of religious mockery (McRae, 2010). Regardless of religious criticism, scientific evidence depict that an artificial human being may possess the greatest quality of human beings.

This is based on that their creation is done by enabling adjustments and adaptation of modern century challenges. In addition, science is of the assumption that human robotics may be the new face of evolution since human beings may fail to endure environmental challenges (McRae, 2010). From the information provided, it is an accurate assertion that religion and science have completely different perceptions of explaining environmental and social factors. The difference explains the conflict between the two social factors.

With more scientific discoveries realized, religious opposition is equally developed. ReferencesGeoffrey, B. (2011). A Short History of Christianity. Sydney: Penguin Group. Mathisen, R. (2006). American Religious History. Dallas: Baylor University Press.McRae, F. (2010). Scientist Accused of Playing God after Creating Artificial Life by Makin Designer Microbe from Scratch: But could it Wipe-out Humanity? Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1279988/Artificial-life-created-Craig-Venter--wipe-humanity.

htmlPhilip, T. (2009). Between Science and Religion the Engagement of Catholic Intellectuals with Science and Technology in the Twentieth Century. Lanham: Lexington Books.