Over the past years, there has been debate about science being threat to the religion. Several scholars, religious hopefuls, evolutionists and the scientists have been on the forefront trying to defend themselves on this question…
Download file to see previous pages...
Religion is all about the fear of the unknown that is being used to manipulate the oblivious and superstitious people. Science basically is all about exploring the unknown and that is dangerous for religion. Scientists therefore believe in evolution and not religion. As the unknown are disclosed and the information gets publicized, the fears go away. Without fear as a control religions lose power and wealth (Ecklund 2012). The church in many cases argues that science was the cause of sin in the world. According to the church science tend to explain the deeper concepts that had been put in writing in the bible. This diverts people’s attention away from the church and thereby reducing their faith. The churches believe in their holy books as the ones that have the real and bona fide message from God and do not need anyone under the sun to neither dispute nor test in any way but should rather believe and do as it is indicated .The understanding of the word of God to the church is therefore non-negotiable and meaningful with no reasonable doubt. Scientists also have their argument that there exist some parts in the Qur’an that are shown by science to be true and is valid. Other scholars say that the biggest threat to the church today is the truth against the powers that the church is gaining over scientific theories in the world (Ecklund 2012). The roles of science and Religion can b complimentary in the society today. The complementary nature can be well seen in the primary and secondary causal of the actions of God. For instance when God separated the Red Sea to create a way for the faithful Israelites was a primary causal. Primary causal are the anomalous ways in which God uses. They can be direct, drastic, rapid and also miraculous actions by God. Secondary causal actions of God are the common and usual ways in which God operates to withstand as well as sustain the catastrophic processes in existence and use them to accomplish some of his missions to the people (Ecklund 2012). The complementary perception is in many cases helpful when God reveals and manifests himself through the secondary causes. For example, chemical descriptions and explanation of the synthesis and make up of water from hydrogen and oxygen atoms are complementary to a theological description of God's providential administration and governance of the chemicals during the reaction (Ecklund 2012). Scientific beliefs and theological beliefs are backing up and mutually reinforcing each other. Several scientific arguments such as the big bang theory gives support to the religious belief that the universe had a beginning as its origin and even the second law of thermodynamics. The theological beliefs were reasonable and realistic even before scientists came in. However, scientific discoveries have given them further support. For example the information on the DNA strands content, the human language and various constants of nature such as gravity. Any science history contains some aspect of theological belief attached to it. This is because science cannot be exercised in thin air but rather needs physiological presuppositions which include the existence and the order of nature and the general know how or knowledge of nature. Theology explains much about the world where the scientific proofs are best justified (Ecklund 2012). However, Science and theology are radically different and non cohesive spheres of life. The difference in the beliefs as every group tries to vindicate the naked truth. Science explains things using natural laws. Any action that is executed by God is not a natural law (Ecklund 2012). The role of The 1999 Kansas Board on Education decision brought the evolution discussion on the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
At the same time, there are also several factors that affect the acquisition of knowledge, such as religion and science. According to previous research studies, religion and science differ on several issues concerning life and the world in general. Science contradicts religion and vice versa, as illustrated in the theory of evolution and creation among others.
Globalization can be explained as Covering a wide range of distinct political, economic, and cultural trends and discouraging barriers. Globalization became commonplace in the last two decades, and in today’s world, barriers and distance don’t matter anymore especially because of the advancement in technology, media and internal and most of all the mode of travelling.
The term "globalization" can be traced in almost every cultural practice and as such, there are repercussions that it brings about to the cultural diversity. Dominant cultures do influence other small cultures in different countries. Due to globalization, the identity of cultural diversity as well as environments that are multicultural, are presumably lost.
According to the essay, the deficit financing is good during crisis times to bring the economy out from stagnation but harmful if it is employed in a sustained basis year after year for the unproductive causes. Still, the underlying causes for which deficit budget is made certainly matter, regardless of the state of the economy.
Science and religion have been criticized for not providing an explanation to the recent development in cosmology and biology. The conflicting ideologies of science and religion are mystifying the cosmos. As such, this confusion arouses debates on the validity of the teachings of science and religion (Regan, Worthing & Australian Theological Forum, 2001).
Globalization does not threaten cultural diversity but enhances greater understanding and cooperation amongst people, communities and nations at large. Culture can broadly be described as values, system of people and community that is sustained through generations and provides them with distinct identity within the defined parameters of social fabric.
His ingenuity and intelligence have enabled him to create over 150 non scientific and 300 scientific works. In his book ideas and opinions, he has clearly analyzed the religion and science (Einstein 44).
Science is the attempt at posterior
The relationship is explainable by considering the four principles raised by Theologian Ian Barbour. He expounds on the four principal ways in which science relates to faith with the look at conflicts, independence, dialogue and integration. Although, these relate in