Reading responds - Essay Example

Response May 02, Response Response to Sarah’s post or your chosen family identifies with relationship within a chosen family, a mutual interaction in which one can derive support from family members. It is also true that as people grow up, conflicts and weaknesses within natural families may restrict relationships and compel people to rely on friends for support. Conflicts among siblings, between parents and their children, and between spouses create barriers between the parties and make it difficult to rely on members of the natural family set up (Cahn, 2013).

Individuals with whom one has not had intensified conflicts or with whom conflicts have been amicably resolved are therefore more able to offer support that a family member with whom a conflict has not been resolved and such people like boyfriends or girlfriends together with their immediate family members and friends can fit into a person’s chosen family. These further mean that your perspective on a chosen family as a source of support is valid. I would also choose my family based on your reason because a person who judges you is less likely to support you.

Criticism is necessary but it should be positive and I have walked out of relationships because of negative criticisms even when I offered my best. Finding honest people to support you is also difficult and once a chosen family is identified, it should be valued, and my experience justifies this. Examples from literature validate your offered type of gender identity micro-aggression your rationale on significance of micro-aggression from LGBTQ is the best because these people could have been exposed to micro-aggression and they understand what hurts most.

On improving cultural competence, I also identified openness and sensitivity to other cultures as the best approach. Response to Karissa’s postA special bond defines a chosen family and the team is actually an example of a chosen family because of the support you derive from it. Teammates have mutual dependence towards the team’s objectives but extending this to personal needs makes the teammates a special family. Unlike normal families in which conflicts are bound to occur and may take long to be resolved, teammates have common interest that require unity and this facilitates resolution of possible conflicts (Cahn, 2013).

In addition, unlike in the set up of a normal family, in which people are bound to be family members, teammates can part ways but the fact that you have stayed together until your final year shows that a natural bond exists within the team. This further explains the sustained support that the team has offered to you and the support that members of the team have derived from you. I would also chose the team as my family if for four years and despite challenges, they had stood with me because this is often difficult even with natural families.

I have witnessed families in which members fail to forgive one another for mistakes and inability to forgive and stand by another person have led to divorce and separation. Finding such tender hearts in friends is therefore a reason enough to choose them into an artificial family. Micro-aggressions from members of LGBTQ could however be more hurtful than are those from heterosexuals because the members are more informed of the identities and associated challenges, and can therefore choose the most hurting statements or actions.

In addition, micro-aggression from a member of LGBTQ is likely to increase the sense of rejection that members of the group face from heterosexuals. My experience from peer informs this. ReferencesCahn, D. Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.