Race as a factor in the evaluation of the admissions process - Case Study Example

The moral defense of a s practice to incorporate race as a factor in the evaluation of the admissions’ process can be examined through the application of diversity and diversity compensation arguments. In this regard, the integration of the diversity argument to the case would grant moral defensibility to the institution by suggesting that diversity grants a society with value and only benefits the society as a whole. Moreover, the presence of obvious group disadvantage which is experienced by members of a certain race would imply that the consideration of race as a factor in admissions is conducive to the reduction of the racial groups’ social limitations while, eliminating the aspects of historical discrimination, the prejudiced mindset of mass media, educational, occupational and residential segregation and the negative impact of the cycle of poverty.

Ultimately, the support of this factor can also be conducted by integrating the concept of representation. Blacks, for example as a racial group is America experience underrepresentation as a group in terms of social and educational opportunities. The accumulation of this aspect promotes the emergence of individual disadvantages which translates into group disadvantage. For example, research on career opportunities and housing arrangements for racial groups indicates that discrimination and stereotyping is prevalent.

The presence of these elements adversely affects the ability of minority students and harms their potential for further development. Through the application of the concepts of aforementioned arguments it can be concluded that race can be justified as an element of consideration in the holistic admissions process which evaluates the individual candidate’s abilities beyond the traditional measures of admissions criteria and takes into account the significance of their life experiences.