The unit defiles the set of principles that advocate for patient protection. As a patient, Mr Garcia required a direct one-to-one attention and observation from the nursing unit. Through their negligence, the…
Download file to see previous pages...
In this case, the patients and the unit staff ought to relate freely in absentia of retaliation. The deprivation of the direct care and attention towards Mr Garcia violated this principle. Consequently, his wife had a retaliatory relationship with the staff in the nursing unit. The dishonor of this principle was also in the deprivation of direct attention that enhanced distance and retaliation within Mr Garcia. Evidently, the Respective Relations principle was involved in Mr Garcia’s case.
Medical necessity was an additional principle involved in Mr Garcia’s case. This principle requires a prudent physician to deliver prevention, diagnosis, or treatment to the patient (American Medical Association, 2010). In this case, Medical care is a basic necessity (Youngberg, 2013). It is not an optional consideration. Evidently, the physicians deprived Mr Garcia direct medical attention. This is a violation of the Medical necessity principle. Honoring this principle would entail direct and affectionate attention towards Mr Garcia at the soft restraints. In his situation, measures of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment were not adequately established. Therefore, they deprived Mr Garcia his basic right as a patient. Apparently, it was a major violation of the Medical necessity principle.
Administrative simplification is a principle that is involved in this case. This principle advocates for disintegration within the complex and confusing roles and communications. It implicates that there ought to be a congruent assignment of roles, and a clear communication strategy (American Medical Association, 2010). Shared governance would propel the visions and objectives of this principle. In this case, every staff member would feel accountable to handle a patient (Youngberg, 2013). Honoring this principle would require the nurses to uphold authority and attend to Mr Garcia maximally. The nurses in Garcia’s case violated
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Nowadays it is evident that the more negligence cases in the healthcare field, the few individuals who are willing to join the nursing field due to panic of lawful implications and invincible suits that rise during the delivery of nursing services to the patient (Barbara, and Phillips, 2013).
Nurses had the duty to manually document the patient details, time, route and dosage on paper based medical administration record (MAR). Later, discrepancies were noted in the electronic data and hand written records. The nurse was unable to make a reasonable explanation and was later suspended by the supervisor.
This evidence is insufficient to prove wrong-doing. First, other nurses have testified that they had themselves encountered difficulties in the preparation of the written records, because of difficulties in remembering the dosages as well as the kinds of medications that they administered during their shifts.
Malpractice involves a professional individual expressing an improper discharge of their responsibility which may result in damage or harm to another individual (deWit, 2001). On admission it was clear that Mr. Garcia case required delicate and intense care from the hospital and its staff.
Recently the patient has suffered a hemorrhagic stroke in the course of dialysis treatment. This has left him aphasic with right sided hemiplegia. Fortunately, there is a kidney available and the patient can undergo a kidney transplant. Evidently, Mr. Suarez is in a very critical health state and this casts doubt over his eligibility as a kidney transplant recipient.
The customer did the right thing by hiring the chain saw from someone else. It was wrong on the part of Alf to insist on the contract and deliver even when the customer says he has hired it from someone else. Not only this there is no point in delivering the hired product late as time is of great essence in the kind of business Alf is engaged in.
Herein, in a case involving a 15-year old daughter who was impregnated by her stepfather, we resolve the issues of who are mandated to report such statutory rape and whether the mother has the right to access of such records.
The statutory rape laws in USA have undergone drastic changes in the last decade.
Other principles that were noted were giving medication a different route than prescribed; not charting the administration of medication in a timely manner and that the hospital has no policy on who should document the medication in case a nurse is working with a someone
erself admitted to frequently making records long after the medication had already been administered and hence making her records prone to error (Butts & Rich, 2008). It is of paramount importance that a nurse should keep accurate records of all narcotics dispensation, dosage as
Malpractice is also equitable to negligence of duty in nursing but not all malpractices are negligence.
There are conditions to filing a lawsuit against a nurse for a negligence claim. Such conditions include; there must be a medical condition
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Legal Aspects of Nursing for FREE!