Legal Aspect of Nursing - Case Study Example

Registration number Lecturer Part a Failure to follow the standards of care. The physician did not follow complete assessment on the admission procedure. The physician should not have admitted the patient when he knew that they did not have adequate facilities to execute the surgery. The physician should have done minor treatment to ensure that the severity of the patient is contained.Failure to act as patients advocate. The physician did not discharge his duties in a manner that best suits the patient.

The physician should have done his very best to ensure that the patient receives treatment immediately. The physician should have looked for an alternative source of the anesthetist or take the patient to another hospital.Failure to provide the appropriate care and referrals to the patient. The physician did not give the patient good care when he was in the hospital. The physician should have spent the night checking on the patient to see any progress or complication that may arise.Failure to assess and monitor.

After doing an x-ray on the patient, the physician ought to have assessed the patient exceedingly well to ensure that there are no complications that arise.Failure to communicate. The physician did not communicate to his seniors or other medical agencies to seek for assistance. There are many medical centers that would have carried out the surgery if they were notified. The hospital could also have requested aid of an ambulance to transfer the patient to another center.Part bThe emergency center physician who represents the hospital is liable for the liabilities raised.

The physician did not do a conclusive assessment on the patient to determine the urgency of the surgery. This would have enabled the physician to look for an alternative hospital where the surgery would have been done immediately. The physician did not have the anesthetist in the center. This is a sign of lack of commitment in his duties. The physician must ensure that there are all necessary medicine and chemicals at all times. The orders must be mad in advance before the stock ends. If the physician had done a prudent assessment on the patient, he would have communicated it to Jose’s parent so that she can take the necessary step to ensure that the patient receives treatment in another hospital.

Having done the x-ray on the patient, the physician should have done minor treatment instead of giving sedatives only.Part cThe court would rule against the hospital and physician. The care standard that was given to the patient is below standard. If the hospital had attended to the patient on time, there would not be any complications on the patient. In the case of Hall v. Arthur, the United States court of appeal upheld a trial court decision, which held the hospital liable due to nurse’s breach of standard of care in anterior disketomy and fusion.

In the case, Mr. Hall argument focused on the orthoblock used in the surgery. After four months, the patient required another surgery. The hospital accepted the liability and did not dispute the jury’s decision.Works citedGuido, G. W. (1997). Legal issues in nursing (2nd ed.). Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange. Guido, G. W. (2006). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall