Foundation and Firm Ground upon Which Congruence Development and Improvement Take Place and Progress - Essay Example

Nursing practice, like other professions, has constantly been enriched and improved by research critical evaluation strategies. As a result, research critical evaluation involves the most effective means of collecting, analyzing, and evaluating information regarding any aspect in (nursing) practice (Stebbins 2006). The critically generated information becomes the basis of making decisions in any field with the aim of improving or filling out the deficiencies that other materials demonstrate. Conducting research is a process that follows specific steps, where in most cases, it has been found seven critical steps are followed. The seven steps are: defining a research question, asking for help, developing a research strategy and locating resources to use in conducting the research, utilizing the most effective search techniques, reading critically, synthesizing and seeking meaning, understanding the scholarly communication process, and citing sources, and lastly, evaluating the sources in the most effective critical way (Stebbins 2006).
Performing critical review and evaluation of scholarly articles does not only constitute making comments about the articles, instead, but it also involves an evaluation of the work in the articles in light of specific and concise issues, together with theoretical concerns in the course (Duffy, 2005). As a result, critical review and evaluation in this study will involve identifying the topic of the article, the audience it addresses, and the overall content of the article. In addition, the review will involve establishing whether the author (s) state explicitly the ideas and information contained in the article; what contribution the article has on the topic it presents, and the kind of materials presented in the work. This is in addition to how the materials have been expressed and argue about the topic being presented; what alternatives exist in terms of arguing on the materials presented; the available and presentation of theoretical issues in the article; and lastly, the impersonal reaction/argument with regard to the article presented.
Quantitative and qualitative research works are both utilized in the nursing practice, with the processes of critique evaluating these two types of information differing greatly. In this research project, critical evaluation of two articles will be conducted whereby, the quantitative critique review will be conducted on an article titled, ‘Measuring self-perceived public health nursing’, while qualitative critical review will be conducted on an article titled, ‘Barriers to, and facilitators of post-operative pain management in Iran Nursing’.