The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer - Essay Example

Part 1

The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer is one of the community adored stories passed from one generation to another among the Scottish people. Reading through the story reveals the wisdom of the traditional masters and their relationships with servants. The writer has done an effective work in bringing out cultural practices, traditions and values of this society by using different literally devices. As readers navigate through this story, they develop an attachment to the Scottish society, learning important traditional values, while effectively relating and applying them to their current lives. From the title of the story, the author successfully captures the attention of the readers.

Folklores often carry a moral story that seeks to transform the lives of the audience. The writer understands that any audience will want to hear or read something that adds positive value to their lives. Therefore, he ventures into the story with the aim of providing moral examples to the audience. From the story, it is clear that destitution is not the end of life. Even the poor can work out strategies that can transform their lives. The highlander is a perfect example of a poor person whose strategies transformed his life. Another moral lesson learnt regards the shortcuts to success. From the peddler and the murders’ stories, the author commendably shows the audience the importance of hard work.

The story and the experiences encountered by the characters appeal to the readers’ logic. The author’s choice of themes and social setting effectively cultivate the readers’ thinking, stimulating the desire to act morally and be honest. When the highlander is given two options: money and three advices, he opts for advice. As the story ends, the highlander ends up with both options through his wisdom. When he is told to use the highway and avoid by-ways, readers fail to see the reasoning behind it until they realize how dangerous the by-ways proved to be. The logic behind the bread is seen after the highlander realizes that the bread contained all the wages he had worked for. Apparently, this story contains instances that indulge the readers’ critical and creative thinking.

The writer’s style, choice of characters and setting of the story reveals his intentions and appeals to the readers’ emotions and opinions. The story begins with a poor man who marries a poor wife. Due to hardships the family separates with the hope of reuniting after success. The highlander works for a master and eventually returns home with a fortune that helps them escape poverty. The circumstances narrated in the story and the experiences the characters undergo to make ends meet capture the reader’s emotions. For instance, when the highlander has to travel all the way back home with bread that he can only eat with his family. Another example is observed when peddler is wrongly accused of murdering the old man and later acquitted when the highlander reveals the real murderers.

The writer’s choice of topic and characters further appeals to the readers’ ethics. The character in the story I a humble man who lives an honest life. The circumstances in his life are tough, but he remains faithful to his wife and his maters. The society also depicts a strict ethical conduct. According to this society, no man has a right to take another’s life. Consequently, they repay murder with murder. Lastly, the highlander’s preference for good advice as opposed to material wealth revels the level of his ethics. Apparently, the author has effectively used these ethical lessons to captivate he minds of the readers.

From the story, the writer’s choice of style also worked effectively toward capturing the attention of the readers. First, the writer uses contrast to show the difference between the highlander’s life and his mater’s. The master had everything and lived a comfortable life, contrary to the highlander. The use of suspense also motivates readers to keep reading to the end so they can find out more. For instance, the readers are eager to know how the three advices played out and the reward the highlander got for sticking to the master’s advice. Lastly, the writer’s use of paradox further fascinates the reader. At first, no one knows who killed the old man. Readers are also eager to know whose coat the highlander had cut. The truth is later revealed, a fact that thrills the audience.

Part 2

Analysis of The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer reveals ambiguity and fiction whose role and morale cannot be understood by ordinary audiences. This story is supposedly told for the purpose of passing on social morals and values to traditional societies yet it is structured in a complex manner. The author lacks the basic storytelling tools required by folklore. From the story, the writer explains how the couple separates with the hope of succeeding individually during the separation. This deviates from the values of most societies that encourage teamwork and the slogan ‘for better for worse’. Readers and left wondering the social context and morale of this story.

Logic is lost when the highlander works for a many years only to choose advice as opposed to the money he worked for. As much as the advice given was useful, no rational being can forgo the only thing that separated them from their family to take up advice instead. The story also lacks closure, a factor that further undermines its credibility as a folklore. Readers are left wondering how the English farmer knew the robberies in the by-way and the death of the old man. It is also senseless to send a man on a long journey through the highway and deny him food, which he happens to carry with him. As much as the story has learning points, the circumstances through which the characters go through to prove the writer’s point do not make any sense to a normal reader.

As mentioned, there many issues left unaddressed by this writer. When the family separates, we are only given the story of the husband and the son. As purported, the family parted so that each of them could find fortune. Apparently, only the man and son’s fortunes are reveals. The writer does not bring to light what the highlander’s wife did during the separation nor what she brought during the reunion. Despite being a little shady, the first analysis has effectively defended the writer’s work and demonstrated the important facets that will make secondary audiences eager to read the text.

Part 3

Rhetorical Analysis

The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer is an example of a good folklore because it adheres to the script of this genre. Just like other folklores, this story is attached to a given social context and is meant to give a moral lesson to the different generations. As revealed earlier, most folklores are community based. This means that they make more sense to the community in which they originate that to any other audience. As a result, the activities, traditions, norms and social values carried in such stories often relate to the community in question. Evidently, the first analysis has effectively adhered this description and effectively appealed to the primary and secondary audiences. This is contrary to what the second rhetorical analysis asserts. The claim that this folklore is complex to secondary audiences is quite outrageous.

When it comes to choice of language and stylistic devices to pass on the intended message, the writer has tried, though not the average level. Although the author has used contrast and suspense, the story lacks major linguistic devices that enhance the flow and make the story more interesting. For instance, most folklores employ humor, satire, irony and sarcasm to make the story more fascinating. All these important facets lack in story. The first rhetorical analysis does not effectively demonstrate how the lack of these devices affects the credibility of the folklore. Moreover, is settles on the least important linguistic devices.

The first rhetorical analysis also presents a shady job in the appeal to ethics and emotions. Ethics is quite a wide topic that should demonstrate the social ethical values of the community. Ethics entail the way people dress, their attitude and responses to situations. Such factors are missing in the analysis. Moreover, it is not clear how the emotions of the audience are triggered. Moreover, the analysis fails to demonstrate the logical attributes of the story. Despite having a few incidences of logical appeal, the second analysis reveals the local flaws that undermine the credibility of the story. For instance, the second analysis reveals how the couple separation and reunion does not make sense in real life situations.

The second rhetorical analysis tries to discredit the writer’s work by revealing the weaknesses of the story. This section successfully demonstrates the writer’s shortcomings. For instance, the assertion that the writer does not satisfy the readers’ curiosity. Apparently, there are many points in the story that leave the audience hanging. This analysis shows how parts of the story, that most readers expect to see, have been omitted by the author.

The writer’s choice of topic and characters further appeals to the readers’ ethics. The character in the story I a humble man who lives an honest life. The circumstances in his life are tough, but he remains faithful to his wife and his maters. The society also depicts a strict ethical conduct. According to this society, no man has a right to take another’s life. Consequently, they repay murder with murder. Lastly, the highlander’s preference for good advice as opposed to material wealth revels the level of his ethics. Apparently, the author has effectively used these ethical lessons to captivate he minds of the readers.

From the story, the writer’s choice of style also worked effectively toward capturing the attention of the readers. First, the writer uses contrast to show the difference between the highlander’s life and his mater’s. The master had everything and lived a comfortable life, contrary to the highlander. The use of suspense also motivates readers to keep reading to the end so they can find out more. For instance, the readers are eager to know how the three advices played out and the reward the highlander got for sticking to the master’s advice. Lastly, the writer’s use of paradox further fascinates the reader. At first, no one knows who killed the old man. Readers are also eager to know whose coat the highlander had cut. The truth is later revealed, a fact that thrills the audience.

Part 2

Analysis of The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer reveals ambiguity and fiction whose role and morale cannot be understood by ordinary audiences. This story is supposedly told for the purpose of passing on social morals and values to traditional societies yet it is structured in a complex manner. The author lacks the basic storytelling tools required by folklore. From the story, the writer explains how the couple separates with the hope of succeeding individually during the separation. This deviates from the values of most societies that encourage teamwork and the slogan ‘for better for worse’. Readers and left wondering the social context and morale of this story.

Logic is lost when the highlander works for a many years only to choose advice as opposed to the money he worked for. As much as the advice given was useful, no rational being can forgo the only thing that separated them from their family to take up advice instead. The story also lacks closure, a factor that further undermines its credibility as a folklore. Readers are left wondering how the English farmer knew the robberies in the by-way and the death of the old man. It is also senseless to send a man on a long journey through the highway and deny him food, which he happens to carry with him. As much as the story has learning points, the circumstances through which the characters go through to prove the writer’s point do not make any sense to a normal reader.

As mentioned, there many issues left unaddressed by this writer. When the family separates, we are only given the story of the husband and the son. As purported, the family parted so that each of them could find fortune. Apparently, only the man and son’s fortunes are reveals. The writer does not bring to light what the highlander’s wife did during the separation nor what she brought during the reunion. Despite being a little shady, the first analysis has effectively defended the writer’s work and demonstrated the important facets that will make secondary audiences eager to read the text.

Part 3

Rhetorical Analysis

The Highlander Takes Three Advices from the English Farmer is an example of a good folklore because it adheres to the script of this genre. Just like other folklores, this story is attached to a given social context and is meant to give a moral lesson to the different generations. Read More