Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
A number various alarming issues are emerging as warned by policymakers and scholars, due to this undesirable trend, such as the administrative chaos, unprecedented violence and health issues. Consequently, corresponding emergency measures have been taken, to cater these issues.
The author states that an invitation to treat comes in when something is displayed in a shop window or a catalog mentioning the prices of goods. Normally this is not an offer; hence it cannot coerce the shopkeeper to sell the items at the stated price. In this case, a contract is made when a prospective buyer accepts the price stated in the items.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
The repaid industrialization in developing countries increased the global temperature levels. The developing countries driving their economic growth have added to the pollution contributing to global warming. To mark the level of global warming around the world the UN has initiated a global forum in 1941 to estimate the influence and the issues related to global warming.
The first part of the question relates to the separation between the executive and judicial branches as indicated in the two constitutions chosen and a comparative analysis is given for the two constitutions. This will have to be analyzed in terms of separation of powers and the principles that operate within the context of the constitutions selected here.
The paper argues that Dworkin’s assertion that there is no judicial discretion fails. It concludes that if judges do have discretion in reality, it is possible for one to discern that discretion enters the picture in hard cases without recourse to positivist tenets.
Consumers are now aware that they are not compelled to sign or engage in cookie-cutter contracts. That if their input was not sought or not included after providing input, then the entire contract can be voided. That all terms or conditions which are included in a consumer contract must be made clear to the consumer.
One of such laws is the law of State liability, in which a European Union member makes up for the losses suffered by a EU citizen as a result of breach of EU laws. This law is developed to ensure that complete rights are granted to individuals especially in the areas of industrial relations and employment.
In the United Kingdom, there are mainly two contracts prevalent in the construction industry, namely National Engineering Contract (NEC) and Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT). The latest version of NEC came to be known as NEC 3 and that of JCT was JCT 2005. At this juncture, the present essay attempts to evaluate some of the important provisions of the two contracts.
The author states that the dilemma is more profound than the halo of morality prohibiting what can crudely be termed as “mercy killing” or suicide or even assisted suicide. Validating euthanasia may not only change the existing criminal laws on killings but the question we should be asking is whether such a law would be mentally acceptable to the society.
This is best explained in the following case, Donoghue v Stevenson, 1932: whereby, a man bought a bottle of ginger beer from a retail shop for his girlfriend. The manufacturer had bottled the substance in an opaque bottle so that its contents could not be seen. When the girl poured the contents into the glass, it contained the decomposed remains of a snail.
The author states that the treaties are in the main building blocks of EU how, and allow for the creation of secondary legislation of EU law. The treaty of Paris 1951 established the European coal and steel community (ECSC). The treaty of Rome in 1957 established the European atomic energy community (EURATOM).
The accurate understanding of the common law of salvage and how cases within are decided is dependent upon a comprehension of the implications of each of these terms/elements of salvage law. Each shall now be discussed in turn and as they have been defined by both the Merchant Shipping Act, 1995 and case law, or decided cases.
The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht) 1992 involved the creation of the European Union. UK incorporated of the EC law into domestic law by European Communities Act 1972. By virtue of ss .2 (1), 2(2), and 2(4) EC law was directly incorporated.1
Art. 221 provide that the Court of Justice will consist of fifteen judges.
The doctrine of direct effect was established in the 1963 Van Gend en Loos case – the Court ruled that the EU/EC citizens had a legal right to expect their governments to adhere to the EU regulations and obligations; the direct effect is expressed as “the capacity of a provision of EC law to be invoked before the national court.”
The death penalty has injured surviving family members of murder sufferers by precluding the logic of closure awaiting capital punishment arises. In addition to the points to New Jersey's olden times as verification: New Jersey re-establishes the death penalty during 1982 but hasn't put to death any person since 1963.
The author of this paper states that frustration of contract can be defined as a prevention from continuation of a contract when the employee who is employed under the contract becomes unable to perform the work for which he was employed due to reasons beyond control by both parties (employer and employee).
The author of the paper states that the cost of gun control has continued to soar. In 1995, the estimates for the cost of the Canadian Firearms Program was $119 million, while actual registration fees would bring in $117 million, leaving the total cost of $2 million to be borne by the taxpayers.
According to British law, “Employees will be unfairly dismissed if their employer dismisses them (so selects them for redundancy when others in a similar circumstance were not selected) because they: carry out or propose to carry out any activities which they are designated by their employer to carry out in connection with preventing or reducing risks to health and safety work.
To make a charge stay currently requires to find the party guilty of recklessness or intent. Currently, intention is a central requirement of criminal law since prosecution requires the party to be found guilty of intent. If the party is found not to be guilty of intent a serious crime could be committed and the guilty party could walk away without punishment.
On the other hand, in regard to the civil law, the plaintiff has to prove to the judge that the defendant is guilty of an offence against him. 1
In criminal law, a crime is defined as an act or a conduct prejudicial to the community, the commission of which, by law renders the person responsible liable to be prosecuted and punished accordingly.
The author states that from the description provided above, white-collar crimes requires an investigation that covers several fields, ranging from economic and financial activities to a clear understanding of the laws of the land. Therefore, white-collar investigators must have in-depth knowledge of economics and finance.
The purpose of this essay is to address the legal issues in the case of Churton and Silver with regard to their unpaid loan with Rick It Merchant Bankers, Ltd. For this essay, I shall be discussing the legal viewpoints of contract law that surround the circumstances of the case at the bar and will advise Risk It on its legal rights.
Segregation was thought to be wrong because it subjugated individuals and groups to secondary citizenship status because of unfair judgments made about persons based upon their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Segregation was also considered wrong because it was contrary to the basic philosophical precepts for which the United States as a society was supposed to stand for such as justice, liberty and equal opportunity.
The aim of anti-discrimination laws is to banish discrimination in public places. Lawsuits involving a member suing a private golf club for its discriminatory policies often revolve around the issue whether the club is truly "private,". Accordingly, a country club that is truly private is not subject to its state's anti-discrimination laws.
In nutshell, the essentials needed for a valid contract, therefore, are as under an agreement between the two parties. An agreement is the result of a proposal or an offer by one party followed by its acceptance by the other; agreement should be between the parties who are competent to contract etc.
In order to ensure that there is a system of fairness, there needs to be more than the decision of NEAT. Rather all higher education institutions need to be brought into the public ambit like the UK has done with its Higher Education Act 2004; otherwise, students in so-called private institutions will not be protected from unfair decisions of their administrative bodies.
The court has almost no obscurity in ascertaining Mens Rea if there is actual evidence, for example, the accused admitting the crime. The subjective test would be thus satisfied. However, most of the accused makes no such admissions. Therefore some degree of objectivity is borne to reach a decision.
(Hamilton, Federalist)
The statement follows the fundamental American concept of government directly influenced by the French philosopher Montesquieu (1949 [1748]) who asserted that separation of powers is essential to liberty. The intent of the concept of separation of powers is the distribution of governmental powers among the different departments so that the whole power is never concentrated in a single individual or group.
The author states that the contradiction leads to that a person, who has not managed to receive the certain values following the rules, start to deny the rules and aspires to receive the values at any cost. That is why people start to commit crimes. Strain theory focuses on situations in which other individuals "punish" the juvenile.
The first scenario will tackle the modes by which a contract can be considered as frustrated and thus will validly free a party from performing its obligations. In the second scenario, the research will dwell extensively on the validity of exclusion clauses that allow a party to escape fully or partially from liability on a contract.
The exact definition of these has yet to be tested, and problems may arise over the exact definition of “technical” and “immoral”. Many electronic goods have design features that serve both a technical function and which are also part of the aesthetic appeal of the product; for example, the features of remote control.
The author states that while Darby has already admitted to the breach, his claim that damages are adequate is anything but adequate. Specific performance is absolutely necessary. It is crucial to understand that in cases involving unique or special property, no monetary value can be accurately assigned.
The aforementioned case shows a new kind of liability. Negligence could not be proved against Mothercare. Injury and evidence that injury was caused by a defective product that is all that was required to make Mothercare pay compensation for that injury suffered by the claimant. This brings about a situation where anyone with an injury.
Legal complexity that faces the issue concerning the definition of 'public authority' in the Human Rights Act section 6(3)(b) is a classic case of public ignorance of their rights or no rights because of the sheer inaccessibility of common information typecast in legal terms.
The police have a few responsibilities which are common throughout the world. These duties involve controlling crime - controlling the level of crimes taking place. This aspect includes investigations and patrolling the streets to avoid crimes from occurring. Maintaining order- using authority to avoid people from disturbing the public’s peace.
By registering the mark TomPot Messrs Soil will prevent their competitors from using their brand name which is likely to cause confusion to their customers. By so doing they will prevent their competitors from using the mark TomPot. However, if they proceed then they will be held liable for infringement.
It is not a must that physical force has to be used. Actually, either threat or a show of clear authority is sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort if the doer holds the victim for a considerable period of time. In the case on hand, Barry was falsely held by Graham while he(Graham) was away making a phone call to his head office.
The author states that individuals embarking on this behavior can be referred to as terrorists, and those at whom the behavior is aimed can be referred to as targets. Terrorists seek to inflict harm or injury on their targets, which may be physical (for example, destruction of lives and property) or psychological.
The author states that terminally ill patients suffer from depression or a false sense of worthlessness, which may affect their judgment. Their decision-making may also be affected by confusion or dementia, which could be relieved with appropriate treatment. The legal position in respect of selective non-treatment was addressed by the House of Lords.
In the case of a controversial and intricate case, as the one discussed above, it is necessary to seek expert opinion by both the defendant, Camilla, and also the applicant, management of Westfield Ltd. who wish to proceed legally against a non-executive director. A lot would depend upon the special characteristic of the company.
This opposition has produced inconsistent standards of investigation and interrogation. The inconsistency makes the law look more like a game than a rational system of justice, wherein the police are unlikely to take the rules seriously and thus encouraged to conduct their own according to their own codes, which include and affirm the necessity of deception as a justified means to their end (Skotnick).
Ethical dilemmas are clinical scenarios when the caregiver ends up in a conflict between two ethical principles, and the correct decision making suffers as a result of that. Therefore, these are practical situations where the caregiver is supposed to do something and at the same time is not expected to do something.
It is important to state that foreseeability ensures fairness for the defendant. Is would be unjust to hold a defendant liable for conduct which they could not have anticipated would result in injury. Being penalized for conduct which does not foreseeably cause injury would result in numerous frivolous claims.
The gap within both the systems is consequently that there is no discrete branch of regulation that relates merely moreover only to the aspect of commercial transactions. There is no divided Commercial Code within England furthermore Wales in addition to a divided authority for the legal action involving commercial disputes.
The author claims that Indonesian people are yet to come out of the trauma they experienced during the Tsunami when the Shariah laws are being implemented in a manner which reminds us of the Stone Age. On the one hand we are talking about equality in the society, but on the other hand we have the example of women being prosecuted.
In the modern American legal system, the difference between law and equity has been narrowed down to exist as one coherent system that ensures total justice. But the substantive merits of both have been recognized even in the merges general jurisdiction. The temporary restraining orders issued by the American courts are a case in point.
Similarly, in the German Sausages case, Commission v. Germany, German law prohibited the sale of sausages containing prohibiting additives in Germany. This law applied to both German products and products from the other EC Member States, even though, the additives were not prohibited by the law of origin in Member State.
The first and foremost problem faced by the group in the discussion was that the group was not decided on what approach to take to tackle this topic because it was a topic that has certain societal taboos against it and definitely going against these taboos and to break out of the norm myopia was a difficult task to do.
The Death Penalty in the United States was first introduced, in consonance with the federal law on June 25, 1790, with the hanging of Thomas Bird for murder in Maine. Since its inception, as per the studies on Capital Punishment, 340 persons including 4 women have been sentenced to the death penalty and executed under Federal Law.
The case study relates the fraud allegation against Columbia HCA, a hospital corporation that has seen remarkable growth and success. It is alleged that the corporation engaged in fraudulent claims to acquire more money from Medicare – a government health care support.