Law Essays

Tennessee v. Garner established that a police officer should only use deadly force when the officer has credible cause that the suspect is a threat to his/her or the public. Saucier v Katz and Graham v. Connor where the courts ruled that reasonableness of the use of force must be considered (Lee, 2010). 

Furthermore, According to the section 55 of the contract act 1872: If it was not the intention of the parties that time should be of

The article is extremely attractive in the introductory part, as it invites a real-life instance of the economy where the Sarbanes-Oxley Act would prove beneficial. In the second paragraph, the writer has defined the meaning of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. According to Rosivach, the goals of SOX were to enhance the transparency of financial information.

The parties involved in this case are the plaintiff, White, who was a builder whose working place was on Fortieth Street, New York City. The defendants, in this case, were Corlies and Tift, merchants whose place of work was 32 Day Street, New York. The defendants sent out details for work on an office building to the plaintiff and requested the plaintiff to give a rough estimate of their expected cost.

Since time immemorial the death penalty has been the most severe form of punishment for atrocious crimes, especially crimes against humanity such as homicide and murder. It is also known as capital punishment and it is normally decided upon by the judiciary and is done through hanging or other means deemed appropriate;

Incidences by law enforcement agencies include harassment, racial profiling, and brutal acts. All around the country police departments have hit the news headlines for mistreating minority groups. Immigrants as well as native minorities are targeted. Diverse states like

Sadly, their effort to make the country open to goods from other countries and the desire to lower tariffs on items sold by America in the market of other nations backfired big time on the US economy. Rather than raising the standards of international manufacture and creating a most conducive international business market.

In this case, it has been identified that four fundamental criteria were ascertained based upon which a claimant can successfully claim tort of negligence. The claimant has to prove that, With reference

The first way is the correct paraphrasing. For example, the sentence “Socrates is one of the best philosophers in the world” can be paraphrased like “Socrates is deservingly considered to be one of the most outstanding philosophers in our history”. The proper source is needed here for a case if our paraphrasing is not ideal.

For jigger to present a strong case against Frankie and ensure that Frankie is convicted of his crime, he needs to prove to the courts three elements. The first element is that there was larceny. Larceny is an offense under the common law in England. It is a crime involving the unlawful taking of an individual’s property by another person.

Many doubts were raised against the verdict of this case such why an appeal or a new trial based on the new evidence was not granted in this case, whether charges against the accused were proved beyond doubt or not and whether accused were punished due to the anti-immigrant sentiments prevailed during the era.

traditions such as racial segregation and sexual discrimination, the Bill of Rights were not really important legally speaking, which is why the supreme court did not need to issue a decision regarding it. It was not until the 20th century when these rights were used to

Corruption permissiveness occurs when the citizens or actors are willing to justify the illegal acts in order to get away without punishment. It is important to draw the line on what amounts to corruption and what is just behavior. It is not corrupt to feel that you should appreciate someone for what they do, like in the case of giving a police officer discounted prices.

Law enforcement is paramount as it helps people to behave accordingly, keeping in mind that they will be held accountable in case they are found guilty. There are three criminal justice models (Reichel, 2002) that are found today,

Like the United States, Canada’s top most courts is the Supreme Court of Canada responsible for declaring binding decisions that are only subject to the constitution and the parliament and whose decision overrules any private or public law in the land.

At times, the government might want to take a private property for the benefit of the larger community. Eminent domain refers to the seizure of a private property by a state to offer essential

There are different explanations for the causes of pedophilia. However, most of these explanations center around one specific factor as the main cause of child preference among pedophiles. According to Finkelhor and Araji, there are four basic accounts for

A law may be considered erroneous or defective based on certain conditions which include universality, refusal of the judge to grant relief to a complainant, and strict application of law leading to hardships.  One reason for making an exception to the law is its universality where not one general law can be applied to several different cases.

This is different from current law as it will require a photo ID and not just an ID card. This is set to help voter fraud and immigration issues. This will add a $2 million to an already frightened budget. Reviewing the bill history shows that there were 20 ayes and 12 nays in the senate. The house had six ayes, two nays and one absent.

Due to this, on September 25, the Government seized the assets of the bank. Coming less than sixty days after the famous IndyMac collapse and hot on

Jesse Timmendequas, a twice-convicted pedophile, was the perpetrator of this crime. He had pleaded guilty in both previous cases involving two girls separately, a five-year-old and a seven-year-old. In this third case, he lured Megan into his house purporting that he wanted to show her a puppy; he then proceeded to rape and kill her. 

This paper will focus on ways or method of protecting intellectual property by preventing movie plagiarism. The paper will also analyze the case study “Hollywood in India.” Movie plagiarism is manifested in various forms. The first manifestation is the direct use

ase was that Plaintiff was standing on the railroad platform of the defendant when one of the trains that was moving on the opposite direction to that of Plaintiff stopped. After the train stopped, two men were actually rushing tom board when one of them boarded successfully

In the case, the plaintiff sued the original owner of the machine for negligence that resulted in his injuries. The basis of this case was the fact that Shama LLC made new modifications to the original equipment without informing him. However, the original owner claimed that he owed no duty to the plaintiff’s employer.

In a criminal court, one can either be involved as a victim or witness to a crime. If a suspect is positively identified, a law enforcer or the witness sign an arrest warrant against the suspect. A judge or a clerk prepares the warrant, and the witness is required to swear an affidavit. The warrant is served to the suspect verbally, and a copy is given to him and arrest follows.

A person with diminished capacity is one who suffers from mental deficiencies that prevent them from being able to commit the crime they are accused of.  In diminished capacity cases, the defendant is typically convicted of a crime that is lesser than the one they are accused of.  Diminished capacity is not synonymous with insanity.

Investigative journalist, Raymond Bonner, in his rhetorical article, “The Last Line of Defense”, censures the criminal justice system. His goal is to expose the flaws in the criminal justice system. He talks about the various factors that bring into question the acceptability and effectiveness of capital punishment.

Although recidivism and rates of recurrence, as well as prisoner conditions, are high on the list of interest within the framework of understanding criminal justice, this research piece will attempt to engage the reader/researcher with the very clear and present problem of “for-profit” prisons as they exist throughout the United States.

A hybrid system that is a combination of individual and master case-management have evolved in due time to handle these cases. This paper focuses on the advantages and difficulties of the hybrid

Generally, there are differences between the two comprising of the type of offense, who files the complaint, punishments, as well as the burden of proof (Kadish, 2012). In essence, criminal law is for breaches of statutory crime and penalty, and civil law, on the other hand, copes with non-criminal disputes.

Occupiers Liability Act of 1984 entails covering the occupiers’ liability for those who are trespassing. This meant that occupiers are under an obligation of owing a duty to the trespassers or even visitors (Jones, 1984). This Act requires that the occupier does not pose any danger to trespassers or any visitors while doing their constructions.

Generally, in the last decades, the financial markets have experienced an evolution especially with regard to capital markets, intermediaries, and financial instruments (Goodhart, 2009). Major structural changes have influenced more on the traditional bank operators, insurance firms, and investment firms.

Walmart is a renowned company in the retail industry. This industry has high growth opportunities, but at the same time there are also a couple of legal problems which surround firms operating in this sector. It can be stated that it becomes essential for firms to be aligned with legal norms in order to maintain their image.

The new upshot sprouting of the intermediate powers reflecting on a fiscal cum has been a familiar commercial source of pressure for change casting doubt on the propositions. Recently, it has been proposed that administrative unworkability should be confined to invalidating attempts to create hybrids since such trusts may not sensibly exercise discretion.

Plagiarism has a Latin origin meaning stealing someone else’s work. The name was pioneered by Martial, who was a Roman poet. He complained that someone had used his verses. The term was introduced into English in 1601 to refer to literary theft. In academia, plagiarism is considered as academic fraud. 

Teenagers are more susceptible to this change, and the rate of recalcitrance for juvenile offenders under counseling programs in the US has always been significantly lower than that of adult offenders.  Putting teenagers in a prison, and even worse with adult offenders is probably to increase the chance of recalcitrance.

That notwithstanding, a notice of prohibition of the sale of tobacco-related products to minors should be displayed in all outlets where these goods are sold. It was meant to bring out a stern warning to business persons who engaged in the illegality of selling tobacco to people under the age of eighteen years.

Al Yah Satellite Communications also had a court dispute with Telesat. The dispute concerned an apparent breach of contract by Al Yah Satellite Communications. In 2008, both companies had signed a binding, bilateral contract. The terms of the agreement stipulated the terms and conditions required of both parties.

Social networking has the power to transform the practice of law in the coming years since it provides a platform through which legal professionals interact. Further, legal professionals are endowed with a range of tools through which they may accomplish certain legal work and other career objectives.

Prohibition of the drugs is a major source of crime because it inflates the prices and invites new criminals into the illegal trade and fosters adulteration. Moreover, prohibition ties up law enforcement officers, who would be available to pursue other serious crimes, to drug related cases.

They are mainly inclined towards performing an illegal activity, either for earning profit margins or money. There are political parties also involved in certain criminal activities. Terrorist organizations possess political intervention. Criminal organizations at times even influence common people to indulge in various activities.

The author states that the set of rules for which each party may present their side of a case goes to the heart of the adversarial system of justice. The rules, mainly through legislation, dictate how a case may be presented and at what stage of the proceedings certain aspects of a defendant’s or prosecutor’s case may be laid out.  

The researcher of this essay aims to analyze the handgun control in San Francisco that is a reflection of the fact that no living person requested the second amendment to the constitution. The paper presents there is no organized militia to protect the law abiding citizen from outlaws and tyrannical government.

If Sandy fails to survive for want of a blood transfusion then Dr. Houseman will be found negligent, while he will also be found to be contravening the ethical standards expected from doctors if he performs any kind of procedure on Sandy without her informed consent.

The trial by jury is meant to represent a democratic system, since members of a jury are chosen from among the public and are therefore likely to represent community values, while also being devoted to preserving the liberty of the subject/accused against oppression by the State to promote citizen understanding of the system and confidence in the justice system.

This must be applied to the provisions of Gretel’s will, to determine which of the specified allocations will constitute a valid trust which can be implemented. For instance, Gretel states that her friend Polly is to get her assortment of porcelain dolls, but ultimately, these dolls are to be shared among Gretel’s “nearest and dearest” according to her expectation.

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which the UK ratified on 7 March 1969 and should have protected Gabrielle from a comparatively lower pay from her employers, and; the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which it ratified on 20 May 1976.

“State interference with a citizen's right to life under Article 2 ECHR 1950 can never be justified”. This statement generates immense controversy. Does it demand negative rights, rights to be free from something, only, or does it imply positive rights? Does it restrict the right to abortion? What is a life, and what must be done to protect it? What is interference? Does it prevent the state from executing someone?

It was then that the business of such illegal drugs began and now it has become so popular, not only in the United States but in almost every part of the world. By the 20th century, United States was facing a very common illegal drug practice in

Merton also views that crime could be a result of a mismatch between goals and structure in society. Society wants people to achieve particular goals, but it does not motivate the same. Thus, with no motivation from society, they aim at their peers who will give them the motivation to support their actions.