Applying The Law: The Case of The Dead Shed - Essay Example

The case of dead shed The case of dead shed Garland Fold was charged in the Court for Baltimore County with four charges of murder,arson of a dwelling and arson of a structure and a first degree of burglary. The appellant was acquitted three crimes. Also, during the appellants’ trial, the prosecution’s witness about the presence of lethal chemical in the barn was read into evidence. At the conclusion of this trial, the appellant was found guilty of arson of dwelling and sentenced to thirty years.

At the defendant’s murder trial, evidence of the extraneous offense which the defendant was acquitted was inadmissible. Evidence is inadmissible under Texas Federal Rule of law Evidence 803(5) when it is stated that the witness did not have firsthand knowledge of any event and no testimony is given. Furthermore, he was acquitted of counts of arson of structure as there was no barn on the farm and the appellant was not armed when he was arrested. The police gave a statement of evidence which was read out.

The appellant had admitted to the police that he burned the shed. Also during the trial, the prosecution introduced evidence which implicated the appellant of arson of first degree burglary which had been earlier acquitted. The evidence was admitted to the appellant’s objection. While the prosecution has made several efforts to prove that these crimes were committed by the appellant and there was lethal chemical in his barn, it was found out that there was no barn on the farm. The prosecution’s case has therefore focused on admitted claim by the appellant that he burned down the shed.

ReferenceFriedman, D. (2005). The Maryland State Constitution: A reference guide. New York, NY: Praeger publishers.