Law Essays

Forensics have been a component of the community ever since the old days. According to history Forensic, science has brought about the reduction of crime and has led to the growth of job opportunities whether in government or private pursuits Peterson & Murdock, 2009).

The case at Ironside presents numerous conflicting interests that deserve effective and timely redress in order to normalize the operations of the organization. Stephanie Connors, just like any other employee of the organization, has specific duties as explained in her job description.

The author describes Corporate social responsibility as one of the most vital concept to enhance the business goals so as to improve the reputation of the organization in an ethical way. Along with this, it is also recognised as a sort of corporate self-regulation implemented within an organization.

These conflicts have caused significant losses in life, property, and issues in terms of peace, safety, security, as well as governance. Traditionally, these disputes are often handled by state actors who have the legal tools and guidelines to resolve these issues.

According to the report it is wise to consider both real-life and hypothetical examples of companies in an effort to determine whether certain behaviors are ethical, and to make decisions about future courses of actions. This particular case study looks at a company named PharmaCare, which is a hypothetical pharmaceutics company.

In the response to the difficulties caused by conflicts in laws and contract disputes, international commercial arbitration devised a way in which such conflicts could be avoided and disputes solved easily out of court. This paper will assess whether the principle of privity of contract undermines the application and functioning of ICA in that it causes unnecessary disputes that have little to do with the actual contract and more to do with the method of arbitration, the conduct of arbitrations and the recognition of awards and orders.

The courts have to adhere to this when it comes to the interpretation of the law. The Human Rights Act therefore leaves the parliament with the role of amending the primary legislations. It maintains the constitutional boundary by leaving the interpretation of the statutes to the courts and their enactment and amendment to the parliament.

Another reason is that the UN operates with a system of treaties, and these treaties often have overlapping and contradictory provisions, which are difficult to reconcile. The courts which are taxed to reconcile these contradictory and overlapping provision are themselves contradictory and overlapping, and each of these courts have limited jurisdiction.

Due to want of modern written constitution, the varieties of norms which one would usually observe are not available under UK’s judicial map except to the magnitude to which they have been borrowed from the membership of the European Union and from the European Convention of Human Rights.

The principle controversy springs from the fact that the law gives both the state and the people the privilege to practice it. Taking a scenario where the opposing parties involve a private party against the state, the state is more likely to be favored. The contentious issue addressed includes whether the courts should unanimously make a decision on the position of private parties against the state in regard to the tenth amendment.

The three entities are the legislature, executive and the judiciary. In this paper, the criminal justice system in England and the US will be evaluated and compared, focusing mostly on domestic violence, rape and abortion issues. The criminal law in England is under the common law, which is supported by a very strong judicial system.

However, the Systems Management infrastructure combines both, allowing for shifts to be made when one part might need to dominate in order to get the job done. In retrospect, the first two systems cannot function alone and attain success. The Systems Management infrastructure combines the best of both to provide the best-rounded style of management for all parts of the Justice System.

Also, this significant aspect i.e. execution of advanced technologies has been able to ensure the making of greater law enforcement efforts especially in investigation and prosecution of crime in an appropriate manner. On a different note, technological advancements are also opening grounds for increased amount of criminal activities.

Takaful insurance described in this essay is based on the principles of Islamic brotherhood that promotes common interest and solidarity. Both parties share the responsibility with a sincere intention to help the other party in his/her difficult time by paying the predefined loss from the predefined sum.

A ban on the wearing of items of clothing and other symbols of religious significance is proportionate due to the democratic values that such a ban protects. Introduction Since the beginning of twenty-first century, increasing number of European countries are facing dilemmas arising from the use of hijab (headscarf) and the burqa or niqab (the full veil) by Muslim women in public places and social institutions, like schools and colleges.

and in China. It employs 550 people and has projected earning of over $46 million. As a huge MNC, Riordan is exposed to numerous risks and legal liabilities in various forms. As part of its corporate compliance, it has to ensure that all the legal risks and liabilities are taken into cognizance and addressed in a preventive manner.

Deviations could range from the harmfully disruptive to mild annoyances depending on the individual action taken and similarly the reasons behind these deviances can also range from sense of dissatisfaction, social injustice, personal preferences, as a means to achieve your needs beyond the limitations of your social stature or a conscious act of rebellion.

Cross-examination on the complainant’s sexual history with others was permitted if the judge was satisfied that the defendant would be unfairly prejudiced otherwise. Sections 41-43 of Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 now restrict cross-examination in rape or sexual assault on the complainants’ sexual behaviour unless leave of the court is granted.

The kidnapper Phillip Craig Garrido was later arrested together with his wife Nancy Garrido and charged with the offences of kidnapping and sexual assault. On the April 28, 2011, Garrido and his wife pleaded guilty to kidnapping Dugard and sexually assaulting her while in captivity.

According to the paper not only can poor operating standards expose employees to such hazards, but the sexual harassment creates discomfort in association with bullying employers, supervisors, and co workers, which may end up lowering the self esteem, sense of security, and the general job performance of an employee due to emotional stress. Due to these associated effects and need to uphold morality in workplace, the governments, labor industries, and business units have made efforts to prevent work place sexual harassment through the established laws, legislatures, and code of ethics.

Theory related to domestic violence in Marriage……………………….... 5-6 4. Gender inequality and domestic violence…………………………………. 7-8 5. Concept of Situational Couple Violence…………………………………… 8-9 6.

In that respect it is important to differentiate between commercial arrangements, where there is said to be presumption that the intention of the parties is to be legally unless expressly stipulated by the parties. Contrary to that in respect of domestic arrangements or in other words social agreement, the element of unenforceability is present on the basis of public policy and this is more than evident in instances where the parties are parents and children.

A Lease of property is an example of a business contract. Contracts create an obligation of doing or not doing particular things, and they are important to the community because they facilitate cooperation and trust. Business contracts are one of the most popular legal transactions that people get involved in when running businesses.

Trochim explains that “evaluation is the systematic assessment of the worth or merit of some object.” This means that in the evaluation of a policy after its implementation, there is a conscious effort to identify if the policy has been of any help to the people for whom the policy was made.

Documented workers are protected from workplace discrimination, from unsafe working conditions, and are entitled to a fair wage. The question is whether illegal immigrants are entitled to the same protections. The answer to this is yes - although the workers referenced in this project are in this country illegally, they still are entitled to the basic rights that all Americans are entitled to, including adequate pay, adequate housing, adequate working conditions, and protection against discrimination.

The firm went ahead and bet against the then low value CDOs. This it achieved by lying to investors by telling them that the CDOs were high-quality. When the CDO market later collapsed, many investors lost billions of dollars and banks were left with hefty loans to pay, loans that also included real estates and CDOs.

These interventions are largely focused on introducing community correction measures that would promulgate healthy behavior in the convicts after their release. The conception itself has given rise to a major movement called ‘what works’ movement. The four fundamental principles acting as a foundation of this movement are risk principle, need principle, responsivity principle and fidelity principle (Braucht, 2009; Cook, 2006; Robinson & Crow, 2009).

In the People of the State of California vs. O.J. Simpson case, the burden of proof comprised: (a) the 9-1-1 call that had been made and a history of Simpson’s violence against Nicole Brown; (b) the hair evidence which was consistent with Simpson’s hair which was found on cap at Bundy residence and on Ronald Lyle Goldman’s shirt; (c) fiber evidence in the form of cotton fiber which matched the carpet found on a glove at Rockingham and also matched the carpet from Bronco at the Bundy residence; and (d) blood sample, among others.

NW, Washington DC, 20015. Jessie Smith and Jonathan Blake run a catering business in the Smiths' basement. In response to a call from a neighbor concerning noise emanating from the Smith house, the police went to this house. As the police approached the house, because of the size and proximity of the front picture window, the police were able to observe that the defendant was smoking marijuana with his friends.

The name was often used as a pet name. The other employees in our department then picked up the same and the employee the name was the order of the day. The employee has now brought a claim for sexual harassment under the title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; This paper seeks to look at sexual harassment in the workplace under the above title, and the provisions that cover offensive language that amounts to sexual harassment in workplaces.

6.0 Conclusion 7.0 References Federal Medical Malpractice Reform There have been rapid and recent developments in the American medical health care systems that have warranted review of various sectors for instance, Health Care Law. Prime amongst them medical liability system whose role in driving up patient’s medical expenses has not gone unnoticed.

This paper examines an important concept of Judicial Independence, which is intended to afford judges the liberty to make decisions without demands or enticement parties affected by the judicial process so that they are able to resolve matters without being forced to later defend the decisions they make.

The Amendments of the Children Act 1989 also came into force in 2005 as well as the Gender Recognition Act 2004.2 Each of these additions to Family law are indications that legislators are intending to improve the institution of family so that it is consistent with modern society.

The charges hurled against him ranged from the possession of the nutria, theft of the gas, and the murder of the neighbor and faces long if not life jail term if convicted. The two charges, namely, murder and theft are the most serious of the three because if convicted, Johnny could be imprisoned for life.

Belonging to certain gang is not against the stipulated law, so an injunction must justify that the mentioned gang in the suit or case is a public problem or nuisance. A person does not need to have committed an offense or crime to be mentioned or named in the injunction (O'Deane 33).

This essay analyzes that the legal obligations of both the buyers and sellers, particularly with the sale of goods contract, has been strictly based on the Sale of Goods Act 1893. Even though the Sale of Goods Act 1893 was created and passed by the Parliament to serve as the common law when solving cases related to the sale of goods.

Special attention is given to the three-strike law and evaluation of its effectiveness since the time it was passed. Goals and Types of Sentencing Sentencing is defined as “an imposition of punishment on an offender following conviction for a criminal offense” (Champion, 2008, p.2).

The reason is that the criteria set by legislators for the protection and the recognition of rights are often not clear, being open to different interpretations depending on the conditions of each case. In current paper emphasis is given on the criteria set for awarding a specific type of rights: the copyrights rights.

These three consist of (i) The Ministry of Justice, which is concerned with the magistrates' law courts, the Appeals Courts, the Crown Court, the National Offender Management Service, and the Legal Services Commission (ii) The Home Office under whose jurisdiction are the police

In the past two decades there were several policy initiatives embarked on which focused on the sex offenders. In spite of the passage of the Jacob Wetterling Crimes against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act of 1994 there has been an increase in stricken laws regulating registration requirements, sex offenders’ activities, residences and abilities to interact with both the family and community members.

The power which is enjoyed by the directors certainly involves certain legitimate interests that can affect the decision making process of the management as well as influence the company as a whole (York, 2011). It has been argued by Austin & Ramsay (2013), on the basis of this context that the party (the corporate entity) who entrusts its property to another party (directors) is at a great risk of losing its property due to the involvement of the other party in fraudulent practices and misconducts.

Negative rumors related to this specific breed are indicative of melodramatic controversy and have formed such a string that it seems as if a propaganda is in progress to make each and every American citizen believe the empty mockery and support the implementation of breed specific legislation in the US in the hope of reducing pit bull attacks.

There are two possibilities surrounding this issue. The first possibility is the fact that the judge could be hindering the jury from discussing the issue outside the courtroom, so that the jury is not able to get full information regarding the actual nature of the suspect they are dealing with and thus unable to unearth the fact that the suspect is liable for the crime since he had been arrested for the same crimes before.

The High Court of Australia is capable to manage cases which come to it on appeal or which start in the High Court itself. Cases which entail interpretation of the Constitution or where the Court may be called upon to depart from one of its earlier decisions or where the Court thinks the principle of law involved to be one of main public importance, are generally determined by a complete Bench including all seven Judges if they are available to sit.

It is worth noting that there exist several rules that guide the transactions involving Bills of Exchange in Saudi Arabia. The first law is referred to as the Commercial Court Law, which is popularly referred to as Commercial Court Law. The other law is referred to as Commercial Court Law while the other is the Negotiable Instrument Law.

In essence, it is a form of a dispute resolution method whereby a third party assesses the proof in the case and imposes a ruling, which is legally binding for the two sides and implementable. Arbitration has benefited from its increasing popularity with business, as well as other users over the past five decades years (Auerbach 56).

The spheres that are associated with advertising and copyrights is complicated and a fragile issue. Hence, the hot issue of data mining has been the focal point in 21st century. According to many companies, data mining for marketing purposes is protected by first amendment rights.

For a better understanding, way may quote here an example of leading case of Carlill v Carbolic1 wherein the competent court of law had effectively addressed the issues.   Accordingly, if an acceptance takes place, binding contract is constituted. The important elements of an agreement is a) it should be in black and white b) it should be in line with the agreed terms c) it should be unambiguous and clear in terms and condition.

The roots of the English arbitration acts have been in existence for centuries. The first one was in 1698 followed by several acts that had organized and developed arbitration according to the requirements of each era. The last of these was the Arbitration Act 1996, which came into force on 31st of January 1997 (1996 Act).

This decision was reached at by a majority of two, with Judge Kaul giving a strong dissent. It was an important decision as it was the first of its kind based on the OTP request to have an investigation that was based on its proprio motu powers. These powers are awarded to the pre-trail chamber under the Rome Statue’s Article 15.