Nobody downloaded yet

Models of Judicial Review - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This means that such nations must identify with a suitable of model of judicial review to assist them test the constitutionality of statutes or treaties as demonstrated in this paper (Forsyth,…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Models of Judicial Review
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Models of Judicial Review"

Download file to see previous pages Additionally, it also involves reviewing an administrative regulation to attain consistency for measuring the effectiveness of a Constitution, statute, or a treaty. Consequently, under the US Constitution, the judicial review lacks explicit powers of reviewing any of the above provisions. Instead, in the US, the judicial review operates through making of inferences of provisions, structure, and history guiding the Constitution. It implies that in a diffuse model, common procedural rules evaluate the constitutionality guiding administrative measures and statutes (Elliot, 2001). Likewise, decisions are mainly within inter parties from the highest to the lowest courts. In other words, most court decisions are deemed retroactive as a rule if there is an unconstitutionality of statutes and this is accompanied with consequences. According to legal experts, the diffuse model of judicial review finds applicability in most countries because of its flexibility and fluidity when approaching sensitive matters touching on the Constitution.
Diffuse model of judicial review differs with the concentrated model of review in varying patterns as interpreted by the law. For example, while diffuse model originates from America, its counterpart is largely Austrian or Europeans (Forsyth, 2000). Similarly, while the concentrated model reviews the constitutionality of statues mostly found in special proceedings, diffuse model is general and is specifically concerned with administrative measures. Contrastingly, unlike the concentrated model that is less widespread because of its limited review functions, the diffuse model is more widespread because it tackles several reviews of the constitutionality. However, both explore the constitutionality of treaties and laws in their respective countries of application.
Constitutional review falls into four broad categories of systems. There is the American or diffuse model that uses common ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Models of Judicial Review Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1640184-models-of-judicial-review
(Models of Judicial Review Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1640184-models-of-judicial-review.
“Models of Judicial Review Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1640184-models-of-judicial-review.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Models of Judicial Review

Judicial Review

...?JUDICIAL REVIEW According to Wolfe, “Judicial review is the series of checks and balances within a definite government can be seen most clearly by examining its approach to constitutional interpretation and its manner of exercising judicial review” (10). The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances. First is in Federalist No. 78 and second is in the case of Marbury Vs. Madison (5 U.S. 137). “Laws which are contrary to the Constitution are therefore void because the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts (Federalist No. 78), because it is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial government to say what the law is (Marbury Vs. Madison), and because... . Corwin,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...Judicial review Introduction Judicial review is the law concerning judicial control of the powers, functionsand procedures of administrative bodies. The courts are therefore vested with jurisdiction over proceedings and decisions of tribunals, inferior courts and other bodies performing public functions. It is important to note that this is a public remedy and not a private remedy. ( Dicey 329-333) in his book defines Administrative Law as “the Law denoting that portion of a nation’s legal system which determines the legal status and liabilities of all state officials, which defines rights and liabilities of private individuals in their dealings with...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Authority Judicial Review Jurisdiction

...I. A. The decisions of the IRA are not reviewable. In several cases, it is clear that an ity which is deemed to be wholly private, even if exercising quite wide-ranging powers affecting many people, is not susceptible to the judicial review jurisdiction. In the case of the Jockey Club1, the Football Association2, the imam of a mosque3, Lloyd's of London4, the RSPCA5 and the British Council6, it was held that since these bodies were exercising powers which were not akin to the essentially governmental nature of truly public activity, despite the possible effect that their decisions might have on members of the public. More specifically, in the case of R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers,...
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study

Judicial Review Case Study

...Judicial review is a function of the legality of the lawfulness of administrative decision. It is also a function of the competing demands of administrative decision making. If a public decision is legal then it can remain as such despite the absence of legal guidance, although this legality may be attributable more to luck than to judgment. While regard to the legal constraints might produce better decision making, and so is to be encouraged, for it to become a ground is a challengeable concept and hence appears to have little merit ( R v. Somerset, 1995). Any arbitrary decisions for which a public official cannot be held accountable represent important and dangerous erosion. Some of the most basic and...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Judicial Review

...and a guarantee that the "Queen of Hearts" will be cautious in losing her temper and pronouncing unconstitutional verdicts! Bibliography 1. Maitland, F.W.(1908) The Constitutional History of England. A Course of Lectures Delivered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2. Jeremy Waldron (2006)The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review ,Yale Law Review 3. Meny, Y.(1993)Government and Politics in Western Europe, 1993, 5, 6 4. Second Treatise of Civil Government, Chapter XII, para 143, 5. Vile, (1967)M.J.C.Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, 1967 6. Galligan(1986) D.J., Discretionary Powers 1986, 219. 7. Dicey, A.V(1959) ., The Law of the Constitution, 10th Ed. 8. ...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Constitutional and Judicial Review

...Constitutional and Judicial Review Introduction: The Human Rights Act of 1998 became a part of the domestic law of the United Kingdom on October 2, 2000 and in that process made the European Convention on Human Rights applicable in the United Kingdom. The Human Rights Act of 1998 thus makes it possible to raise issues relating to the European Convention on Human Rights in the courts across the United Kingdom. The affect of this is expected to nurture a culture of rights and responsibilities in the United Kingdom. It also has its consequences on the courts in the United Kingdom and the sovereignty of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Human Rights Act of 1998 and Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Human Rights Act of 1998 has led... and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial review

...PART A. The act of reviewing the decisions of the lower courts, tribunals and administrative bodies by the High Court is known as judicial review in English law. Some of the court orders are certiorari, which sets aside a decision; mandamus, which makes it imperative for a duty to be performed; prohibition, which orders that an action should not be undertaken as it is unauthorized; a declaration, which defines the legal rights or obligations or an injunction. In short, judicial review is that power of a court, which empowers it to scrutinize a law or an official act of a government agent which violates the fundamental principles of justice or the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Judicial Review- public law

...Judicial Review – Public Law The principle of deference requires the courts to abstain from arriving at an independent judgment, in order to accord adequate esteem to the executive or the legislature. However, the courts have to refute the acts of the legislature or the executive, and this causes considerable controversy. The justification for such interference was elaborated upon by Lord Hoffmann in R (ProLife) v. BBC. In this context, he had stated that there was a deferential relationship between the judiciary, and the executive and the legislature. However, was unwilling to accept that there was any servility of obsequiousness involved (R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC , 2004 ). In the Prolife case the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Administrative Law Judicial Review

...The factual scenario raises various complex issues in administrative law and shall deal with the following issues in turn Whether the Greener World has Locus Standi to bring a claim for judicial review; 2) Remedies available for judicial review and what the remedy would achieve; and 4) What grounds Surinda would have for judicial review 1. Judicial review is the process by which courts scrutinise and consider the validity of the manner in which public authorities have made a decision2. The essence of judicial review is to ensure that public authorities act...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...while carrying their duties and that means that in course doing their tasks, they must uphold the similar principles held by courts in judicial reviews is. On this basis, it has the full discretion to set aside the evidence set out in the initial stages and could even allow new evidence. In this regard, the independent Review ought to have heed to Claimant prayers for setting aside of evidence of witness P which formed the fulcrum of the ruling against the claimant. TIME LIMITS 54. The claimant urges this court that the application herein has not been filed in compliance with thePart 54 Rule 54 (5) of The Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Directions, 1998as read with Part2 Rule 2 (8)...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Models of Judicial Review for FREE!

Contact Us