Law Essays

According to the report Contract Law and Case Law in contract law, a consideration is described as somethingof considerable value that has been given by the parties involved in a contract to aid in motivating them to agree to enter into the intended agreement and in the process exchange mutual performances that are considered to be legally enforceable.

The parents of the children would argue that this is not the impetus behind their decision, however, in some instances where the child might eventually develop to a level of the majority where she could give informed consent as in Re D, mentioned above, there can be no justification for attempting to have the child sterilized.

The HOL has a significant number of members and if they do not correctly represent the interests of the common man, especially in terms of gender and social background, the purpose of the democratic process is defeated. It is true that the experience of the seniors does go a long way in supporting the decisions and issues of the House.

The issue in this question relates to the doctrine of consideration, the traditionalists approach towards the varying of the terms of the contract and the doctrine of promissory estoppel. An evaluation of each of the concept would include the circumstances in which the courts is or is not willing to enforce promises which vary terms of a contract.

The approach to the cottage purchased by Parminder was through the back garden of the cottage purchased by Oscar. Subsequently, Oscar blocked the pathway leading to Parminder’s back garden. This paved path had been previously used by the tenants of the factory, since 1930. It is to be determined whether Parminder can regain her rights and prevent Oscar from blocking access to her back garden.

The slippery slope theory claims that a minor step that is taken at first is likely to result to a number of effects either immediately, with time or in future. However the strength of such an argument will depend mostly on the warrant and whether the warrant is capable of demonstrating a process that will bring with it an effect.

The criticism goes that the American criminal justice is fragmented and the competing and overlapping nature of the judicial organization makes it ineffective. Although the fragmented nature of the criminal justice system indeed leads to certain disadvantages, one must remember that America has many advanced constitutional provisions.

As an administrator attempting to maintain positive productivity and working relationship between both informal and formal structures of control, one would have to approach the political side. By appealing to the voting base one could potentially retain positive momentum through the use of a positive public relation campaign.

Generally, community policing has been effective but only in cooperative societies. However, the effectiveness has been hindered by a lack of effective cooperation within some regions. This paper discusses the effectiveness of community policing in combating crime and the challenges facing the policy.

Labor law ensures that employees adhere to the requirements of their contracts. Labor law is not only a body of laws but also refers to various administrative rulings and earlier cases and agreements that dealt with the rights, freedoms, and restrictions on workers, workplaces, and employers.

e where the anti-abortion activist, Scott Roeder is accused of shooting the abortion doctor George Tiller, the trial judge considered the mitigating factor of imperfect self defense. If I was the trial judge of this case, I would have passed the same verdict because this is not

However, the commentary presents the adoption of the technology as a move that intrudes into privacy of people, breaching the right to privacy of the American citizens. The commentary is assertive that people should not give up their right to privacy

The presence of substantial risk of the child being born with mental or physical complications or handicaps. The Upmarket NHS Trust established that Clare’s baby may be born with a physical disability. The only exception to this case is when Clare comes from or resides in Northern Ireland or any other, state or region that is outside the United Kingdom mainland.

The Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. Aguillard declared that the teaching of creationism in Public Schools was devoid of a clear secular purpose and contrary to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Act under consideration in no way furthered the secular purposes aimed at “protecting academic freedom.”

The law enforcement officials conduct a preliminary breath test that shows whether the driver is drunk or not. This test makes sure that the driver is not drunk and ensures the future betterment of drivers and other people using roads. Dependent and independent variables of drunk driving are crucial to be known, as they affect people using alcoholic drinks to a harmful extent.

When we consider the situation surrounding Kevin, we find that his problems relate to the law of adverse possession. The main problem is in the nature of trespassing and the requirements for adverse possession. In the paper, we look at the nature of adverse possession and whether or not Kevin is trespassing, and then we look at the manner in which Kevin can own the strip of land.

A major fundamental question in law is whether a particular coat has jurisdiction to preside a particular legal or civil proceeding. In such a situation, it can be broken down into three entities: jurisdiction over an individual, jurisdiction over a particular subject and that to render the particular judgment that is being sought. 

The model aims at efficient control of criminal activities through investigations, prosecution, and conviction of suspects with the ultimate effect of eliminating criminals from society and setting examples to deter others from engaging in criminal acts. This is likely to maintain social order by eliminating criminals.

It is hard to characterize marriage in a manner that could apply to all marriages, because that marriage implies whatever the couples who are marrying take it to mean. Recently, the meaning of traditional marriages has been changed with the approval of same sex couple marriages, which raised several questions and legal considerations.

The criminal justice system rather than being a tool for the prevention and control of crime could be perceived to be propagating and supporting racial discrimination. It is alleged the majority of those subject to discrimination is the racial minorities i.e. colored folks. As an instructor in Law, the views of the author may be deemed logical with a firm foundation of prevailing laws and legislature.

the debtor can get recourse from such a change of mind by the creditor by proving to the court that such a change of mind is unconscionable. For instance, it is clear that since the creditor has agreed to forgive the debtor of the debt owed, changing their mind and making a fresh demand for the debt would inconvenience the debtor.

According to the Amendment, a search shall only occur when there is probable cause that has support from an Oath or affirmation

Generally, the paper aims to explain the government contracts in Saudi Arabia, and the establishment, and the development of the Saudi Government Tenders and Procurement Law. Besides, it researches the basic ways to form the government contract, as stated in the Government Tenders and Procurement Law.

The author states that deterrence theory dated back in the fourteenth century from the works of a classical philosopher like Hobbes and Bentham. These theorists objected the widespread practices by Europeans, and the spirituality of crimes that formed the basis of the traditions. They developed the basis for modern deterrence theories.

about police brutality holds an old history in the American history with changes and rights and freedoms to all in the U.S perceived as the bridge towards putting an end to police brutality on minorities. However, the recent killings of Michael Brown in Fergurson, Missouri and

the British parliament is still sovereign. This is despite the membership of the British government into the European Union, and the decision by the United Kingdom to sign the EHCR treaty. For instance, the Human Rights Act of 1998, section 4 gives the courts the mandate to adopt the concept of unconstitutionality. 

When one enters the job market either for the first time or after a recent termination, it is vital to comprehend his or he rights as an employee. Discrimination and frustration at the place of work can take many forms, for instance, treating a member of a protected class such as women and minorities differently from their peers (Walsh, 2016).

From the above discussion for the first issue it can be said Balmoral has to show that the follow the guideline which develops by the case law. For the second situation the restrictive covenants by Balmoral will be enforceable. In the third situation, the question arises whether the Court considers Ali’s claim reasonably practicable though he was five minutes late.

In the concerned question, in both the deals, cars purchased by the buyers were required to be durable and fit for driving along with safety by terms of implied conditions mentioned above. An important point in this regard is the appearance and communication of any defect as to these implied conditions in time.

On 1 May Angela posts a letter to Boris offering to sell her caravan to him for £2000. Discuss if and when a contract is formed between them in each of the following alternative situations: (a) Boris receives the letter on 2 May. On 4 May he posts a reply accepting the offer. This reaches Angela on 5 May but on 3 May she had sold the caravan to Celine".

The defendants were convicted of gross negligence manslaughter, or as the trial judge called it, "manslaughter by omission", but their appeal was allowed because he had omitted to direct the jury that it is a condition of gross negligence manslaughter that the defendant owes the victim a duty of care and that that duty had to have been breached.  

ces Commission, told the committee that health care to illegal immigrants last year cost the state nearly $100 million, mostly for emergency hospital care… The figure includes the cost of 63,000 births – including 11,000 at Parkland Memorial Hospital, as The Dallas Morning

Ace Sports 10% for having installed a basketball hoop that would cut somebody when they dunked the ball; City General Hospital 35% for their policy of turning away people without insurance; Nurse Williams 5% because she followed the unethical policy and for not giving Bobby the necessary treatment to save Bobby’s wrist.

Integrity is one of the most central issues in criminal justice professions and it is essential that every professional in criminal justice remains credible by upholding integrity. Judges and police officers,

This essay analyzes the differences between civil and criminal law. The main purpose of filing a case is to obtain a remedy from a court’s ruling; however, remedies offered in civil cases differ with remedies offered in criminal cases. Most criminal cases will have jail sentences and fines while cases offer compensation that has a monetary value.

There is a case of silent fraud, where the defendant, Zulu, failed to disclose some material facts about the purchase, material facts with which the plaintiff, ABC made reliance upon when making the purchase. In this case, material facts refer to information, which, if known, would make a difference on the decision made by a party in an agreement 

To avert this, order pickers should be properly scrutinized before delegating such sensitive responsibilities, and in this screening, they must provide their felony records to ensure whoever is

Gore, already 58 years of age, was reportedly put to death through lethal injection on the said date at exactly 6:19 am at the Florida State Prison. He was likewise reported to have killed a total of six women, four of

Justice is a broad and complex concept where we try to find equilibrium to an event. It is evident that in what we call justice, two wrong things make the right. This paper would discuss the competing paradigms of punitive “net widening” policies. In the system that we have now, crime is prosecuted as a “crime against the state”.

The information is self-value, it can be bought and sold as a separate product, and nowadays this product is the most profitable. The World Wide Internet has become an integral element of the modern information environment. In this context in the network, there is a lot of valuable information such as information on bank accounts, transactions. 

A recently published National Highway Traffic Safety Administration survey reports that 44 percent of drivers have a phone with them when they drive, 7 percent have e-mail access, and 3 percent have facsimile capabilities. Those numbers are likely to increase. Other technologies that increase possible distractions will also be added to vehicles.

To be effective in assessment concerning meritorious legal proceedings, one must perhaps look to the past for direction. This case is unusual to the rule of law because it is rooted in personal autonomy. The

Ellis (1998) asserts that the principle consists of three viewpoints explicitly; Aptness: legal power or executive power must apply in a way that is suitable to achieve the intention for which the authority bestows.  Necessity: the use of authority ought to be crucial to accomplish the pertinent purpose.

I am a very honest person. I am also hardworking, a quick learner, a team player, and ambitious. I possess very great decision-making skills, I can work in any environment and I do my work very diligently. My academic interests are mainly business administration and law. I want to improve my knowledge of the law in energy and my English skills. 

On this basis, a successful claim of necessity must give a proof that the act of the accused was to avoid significant harm, there did not exist an adequate lawful method of escaping the harm under consideration, and the harm that the accused avoided was bigger when compared to the harm caused, through breakage of the law. 

As the report stresses the Criminal Investigation Department provides organizations and government departments with security clearance for their potential and existing employees. This clearance involves a background check on individuals to establish if the person has a crime record, both within the UAE or anywhere in the world.

Posse Comitatus law recommended that the army should stick to its activities and stop engaging in police-related activities. Instead of using the military, Pena-Nieto’s administration should establish sheriff’s departments along the Mexico-Texas border. Sheriff departments would help manage security, and increase the workforce.

The Bureau of Justice Assistance defines intelligence-led policing as a collaborative law enforcement approach that combines problem-solving policing, information sharing and police accountability, with enhanced intelligence operations (Carter 80).I provide an argument for the concept of Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP).

For this reason, there is a high possibility that the court will clear him of any wrongdoing, especially where he is sued for negligence. To determine whether there was any negligence, for instance, the court may need to focus on whether Jill owed the population a duty of care, and whether he did all that was necessary to achieve this.

Human trafficking is a reflection of the contemporary slave trade. Traffickers usually prey on populaces who are poor, children and women, the jobless as well as those who lack access to the communal safety net. The victims are normally enticed with fake promises of fine labor and improved living, and then pressured to labor in cruel and inhuman situations.