StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Democracy is Based on Justice - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the "Democracy is Based on Justice" paper argues that any democratic procedure must not consider justice as an aloof and detached consideration but as what the society would invest in when all the prejudicial views that a person holds are removed. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Democracy is Based on Justice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Democracy is Based on Justice"

Democracy is based on Justice Freedom, justice and democracy have increasingly been invoked as important solutions for development in the world. It is believed by most of the contemporary liberals that only democratic arrangements can be just. That in evaluating the status of an individual, one must go beyond income, rights, utility and resources to the actual lives that people leave and the freedom of choice that they are accorded. Both democracy and justice are concepts that are very complex. Justice is the set of principles that major function is the distribution of entitlements, of rights, opportunities and resources. These would include income, wealth and the liberties that an individual possesses. For it therefore to be justice, the individuals to who these opportunities are presented must be several. Justice principally answers the question of who has a right or is entitled to what, in a given set or relative to other people or agents. This is more so, in an event that several agents are competing for these opportunities to meet different goals. In a liberal view therefore, and under these circumstances, a just distribution would take into considerations the provisions of mutual and equal respect. Democracy on the other hand, is a set of collective decision making processes. In these processes, those who belong to a given society or a particular group have an equal say in determining the rules that govern or should govern them. It is what Rawls defines as the exercise of public reason. While the principle of democracy could be operationalized in a varied number of ways, its respect involves protecting the rights of the individuals, their liberties and their freedoms. These rights extend to the right to free speech, the freedom of expression and the freedom of association. It involves the right to let the majority determine who will hold political offices, and what laws will be used to govern the society. It also includes giving every individual, who has the capacity to vote, the chance to make his voice heard. While democracy is the respecting the will and the say of the majority, justice is protecting the rights of everybody in the society, including that of the minority. It is from this that justice and democracy always seem to come into conflict. The rules that are chosen through democratic procedures may fail to align with the demands that justice would propose for the society to appear or be just. The priority of the right over the good is one of the most central convictions of the political liberalisms that John Rawls proposes. It is common for democratic procedures and processes to be carried out in good faith. However, it is not always true that democratic procedures will always have it right when it comes to justice. It is common for the majority to use the strength of their numbers to stifle the voices of the minorities. It is for this reason and to remove this difficulty that minorities usually have their fundamental interests guarded by the provisions of a constitution. In this way, the controversy is removed from the whims of the majority. It is the belief of every liberal society that there are certain core principles that a society must have. Without these core principles, no society however developed, cannot claim that they express equality. Most of these interests typically provide for the basic freedoms, liberties and needs of an individual, including shelter, nutrition, sanitation, education, freedom of movement, bodily integrity, the freedom of thought and the equality before the law. As a consequence, subsistence rights and the liberties of a person place constraints on all the democratic decision makings. That is why if any outcome of any democratic process or procedure violates the provisions stipulated in the supreme law, that process is considered ipso facto unjust. For instance, the Declaration of Independence by the United States, that was adopted by the continental congress on the 4th of July 1776 asserted certain natural rights. It was a justification for a process that the thirteen American colonies felt for the right to a revolution, against an otherwise democratic society headed by King George III of Great Britain. It is well known particularly for the following statement: we hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This has become the most fundamentally quoted statement for the expression and assertion of justice by people who feel oppressed. It matters not that such oppression and injustice is stemming out of an otherwise democratic process as true democracy is based on justice. Even though such justice may be protected by the constitution, it is sometimes possible for injustice to occur. It is sometimes almost impossible to determine which laws would be considered unjust even when they are democratically legitimated. The balance between democracy and justice is usually tough. Taking Rawls principle, assuming that justice requires wealth and income to be distributed in order to maximally benefit the worst off, and the citizens of a society that is liberal are called to vote on a reform that would ensure this happens, if the reforms pass, there are some individuals who are not well off who may not get what they deserve, while on the other hand, the wealth of the rich will be touched, thus violating their rights. It would be hard to find a way to ensure that a balance is struck between these two concepts. Equal respect presents the society with a sense of what may be ruled out for a just political and democratic system. It however does not show what is indeed required. It is possible for certain matters to fall outside the scope of the protections that the constitution may guarantee, for example the issues that may arise as to redistributive taxation. Given a democratic process, the majority will carry the day. It is for this reason that democracy tries to strike a balance. For instance, the Federalist Paper Number 51 by James Madison addresses the means by which it would be appropriate to provide checks and balances in the government while at the same time advocating for the separation of powers with the government itself. It tries to limit the powers that the principles of democracy may present to the minority interests and the just administration of policies to those who may not be well represented. It states that in order to lay due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of the government, which to an extent, is admitted on hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own. Consequent, each should be so constituted that the members in each department should have as little agency as possible in the appointments of the members of the other departments. It goes on to state that some difficulties and some additional expense would attend the execution of such a system and as a result, there may be some deviations from the principle. Developing the normative principles of agency, choice and freedom embodies the participation of an individual in matters of social choice and public decision making that is an integral part of a just system. This is the essence of political freedom and the core of a democracy. It is the reason why revolutions have occurred in various parts of the Middle East and the heart of the clamors for more freedom and democratic space in several countries in Africa. It is political freedom and the civil rights that allow people to make unregimented and informed formulation of their values in an open channel for arguments and communication. It thus enables proper democratic choice and freedom of speech that are necessary for the achievement of a proper understanding of what is necessary and what the economic needs of an individual are. It thus gives the members of a democratic and just society an opportunity to be able to demand what they value and the attention that they seek publicly otherwise such an approach would not work in the development of human capabilities. In his book, Theory of Justice, Rawls states that according to liberalism, justice is the first virtue of all social institutions. It therefore does not matter whatever virtue is, it is always connected to what we perceive to be the good life that everybody aspires for, The goal at the end of everybody’s pursuit of happiness. He also notes that the rights that have therefore been secured by justice and not subject to any political negotiation, discussion or submitted a democratic process that would water them down (Rawls, 4). In conclusion, it is important to note that any democratic procedure must therefore not consider justice as an aloof and detached consideration but as what the society would invest in, when all the prejudicial views that a person holds are removed. It is a consideration that democratic society that does not perceive justice as a concept that is acceptable and agreeable to all its members cannot be heard to claim to be a society of equal and free persons. This is because, ultimately, the majority wishes for what is best in their interests and so does the minority. This is to say that they both pursue the goals of a good and happy life, which could only be presented in a just and equal society. This is why generally; democratic procedures are constitutive of the truth relating to justice Work Cited Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Ed., revised, Oxford: Clarendon, 1999 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Democracy is Based on Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1, n.d.)
Democracy is Based on Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1. https://studentshare.org/law/1752369-persuasive-arguement
(Democracy Is Based on Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1)
Democracy Is Based on Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/law/1752369-persuasive-arguement.
“Democracy Is Based on Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1”. https://studentshare.org/law/1752369-persuasive-arguement.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Democracy is Based on Justice

American People

He says that democracy is the rule of popular passion whereas in a republic, sanctions govern the people where passion is considered as an unfit.... Americans have lost pride in them and in their country, for which it is required to stop fighting among them and concentrate on the ideology proposed by their forefathers for equality and justice and ultimately a prosperous nation.... As the dispute grew more and more the American Patriots set forth to win their independence and to build a new equality based society....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Justice as a larger loyalty and theory of recognition

From the mere observations, Rorty suggested that democracy establishment and preservation varies from one culture to another hence; democracy is affected by three major problems in general.... From the mere observations, Rorty suggested that democracy establishment and preservation varies from one culture to another hence; democracy is affected by three major problems in general.... hellip; In his research and writings towards justice and democracy, Rorty suggested that democracy can only be recognized world wide as moral legitimacy forms of government....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Concept of Leadership Through Service on Using Justice

based on this, they will claim that since Thrasymuchs believed only a fool would use power to their own disadvantage, the existence of justice in society was inseparable from the exploitation of the weak by the strong (Barney).... A second premise on which support for the initial claim is based is the fact that in most cities, the happiest and the strongest are often unjust.... This essay aims at discrediting Thrasymachus, reasoning and arguing in favour of the opposite claim that justice is by no means the rule of the strong....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court

If approved, then the Supreme Court justice takes the bench for life.... The safeguard is once the justice has their appointment, the President or Senate no longer has any power over them.... This allows the appointed justice to rule freely without fearing retribution from politicians.... The United States has had this practice since the inception of the new democracy.... The United States has had this practice since the inception of the new democracy....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Courts are Independent Agents of Social Change

For instance, Rahl's book on democracy is quite relevant in addressing the social justice system amongst humans (1993).... In most cases, people come up with justice systems so that the vulnerable amongst the majority can be protected.... By definition, the form of dispensation of justice in… Even in cases where there is no democracy, there is normally a form of rule and social equality.... Courts are described as justice systems through which retribution is passed as a judgement in relation to an offense There are many sides of the argument when it comes to evaluating the importance of courts as justice institutions....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Shared Truths Among Law and Religions

This and many such rules are based on common sense and are approved of by the basic human sensibility irrespective of a belief in religion.... Evidence of this can be witnessed in that all societies have a system of law and order that is directed at promotion of justice and deterrence of injustice and violence, whether that is a predominantly Christian society like America, a predominantly Buddhist society like Burma, or a predominantly atheist society like Japan....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Indias Stable Democracy Puzzle

The puzzle is based on the fact that many poor or middle economic countries lack a stable democratic regime.... The country's justice system is also based on religious and cultural values but not a democratically accepted constitution.... Only those poor countries that have able and authoritarian leaders attain democracy.... This essay stresses that India's democracy, however, faces a grave challenge due to the country's substantial association with governance and religion as well as cultural practices....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Social Policy in Britain

Therefore, Social democracy is a system of governance based on economic and socialist theory with the aim of establishing equality among all people in terms of wealth and opportunities.... he Three Perspectives of the UK Welfare StateSocial Democracy Social democracy is a politically-based ideology that aims at establishing democratic socialism through the formulation of reforms and gradual methods.... Social liberalism aims at ensuring that there is a proper balance between the liberal rights of an individual and social justice....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us