In most cases, people come up with justice systems so that the vulnerable amongst the majority can be protected. This is normally the case in established democracies. By definition, the form of dispensation of justice in…
Download file to see previous pages...
There are many sides of the argument when it comes to evaluating the importance of courts as justice institutions. For instance, in as much as they promote justice, equality, and the principles of social justice, there are occasional instances when the established institutions can be taken as being biased. The following discourse is going to delve into the position that the institutions play in social justice. In particular, the analysis seeks to identify whether the courts are systems that bring change as they are supposed to. As legal institutions, courts have been serving their purpose in established and just societies as the setups for offering justice. In addressing the topic under discussion, the paper takes the position that courts are free and independent platforms for introducing change.
In addressing the importance of courts in contemporary societies, the discussion is going to refer to the opinions of other authors. For instance, Rahl’s book on democracy is quite relevant in addressing the social justice system amongst humans (1993). In normal democratic systems like in the United States, the system of justice is organised into hierarchies. In the case of America, the ultimate decision when it comes to legal judgements or decisions lies with the Supreme Court. Rahl argues that the court is an institution that should be used to protect the interest of the minorities (1993). This is because the majority can be favoured by established institution policies. In the case of bringing change, courts have been used to protect the interest of the majority. However, this view is also arguable.
Change is normally brought through policy formulation. This is normally the jurisdiction of the legislature. However, courts act as legal advisers when it comes to having an interpretation of the constitution. Therefore, even in the interpretation of the constitution, the courts play a role in policy making.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Courts are universally responsible for dispute resolution when a complainant remits accusation or charges on the other party. Both parties possess equal rights in a way that the accused should be allowed to shield themselves from the charges, since the accusation may be false.
Biasness is holding a partial point with reference to other objects, people and groups. Biasness generally does not hold a neutral point of view. Biasness, present in many forms, is often considered as the synonyms to prejudice (Kothari, 2007, p. 131). Social desirability bias: Definition Social desirability bias can be defined as the tendency people to provide answers to questions in a way that is going to favourable to others.
The group’s representative enacts these. The term collective action possesses theories and formulations in most areas of social sciences, which include; political science, economics, psychology, and sociology (Sandler, 2010). Collective action, in explaining social movements for change, has involved the examination of factors that lead social integration and those that lead to conflict and deviance.
The effort for equivalent employment and didactic prospect is a key to addressing these tribulations.1
As per 2003 Census report there are around 2,800,000 American Indians in the US mainly distributed in California, Oklahoma and Arizona though they are unevenly distributed all of the US under 561 tribal governments that are recognized by the Federal Law.
There is no logic in thinking that such a person with such hopes and aspirations, after coming to a sanctuary city where he/she has no need to fear of persecution regarding his/her immigration status, then turn
The Legislative branch makes the laws of the land. The Executive branch executes the laws of the land. The Judiciary interprets the laws of the land and it is the branched possessed with the power of judicial review.
Judicial review is that specific power of
The present inflation is a good proof that his predictions might come true if the population continues to increase at the present pace. While this view is being held by Neo-Malthusians, anti-Malthusians have
elated to diversity of researches, because it’s a general modern tendency for all disciplines to spread fields of their interests beyond one discipline.
The term “globalization” is widely used nowadays and comes as a background for all social changes. It means connections
Such social movements include but not limited to The Occupy Movement, Landless movements in Brazil, The Environmental Movement in United States and the famous Civil Rights Movement which started in 1955
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Courts are independent Agrents of social Change for FREE!