From this research, it is clear that Dubois’ program was contrary to that of Washington in that he, unlike Washington, agitated for Blacks to get equal rights as Whites immediately after the Reconstruction. According to Dubois’ program, Washington had accepted mistreatment of African Americans through racial segregation. He also criticized Washington’s education-oriented approach as a way of making Blacks the servants of the Whites. In Dubois approach to the liberation of Blacks, he focused on the law, press (publicity), and protests as the strategies that would ensure the immediate liberation of the Blacks. To Washington, Constitutional Rights Foundation explains that it was necessary for African Americans to prove to the Whites that they were relevant to the American economy before they would gain equal rights.
This essay stresses that the backgrounds of the two contributed to their differences in approaches to Black liberation. The background of Dubois shows after teaching in Ohio (shortly), he directed a study that focused on the social conditions of the Blacks living in Philadelphia. From his studies, he concluded that lack of racial equality (not education) is what ‘locked’ Blacks from good jobs. On the contrary, Washington’s background shows that he designed the Tuskegee Institute as a place that would train the Blacks to gain skills that would make them fruitful in the economy. It is the reason Washington took the educational approach towards