Download file to see previous pages
One can see that internal insurgencies can be dealt with ease but the rapid spread of terrorism and it’s after effects on world nations cannot be dealt with ease. To be specific, cross-border terrorism is an imminent threat to the multiracial society of Britain. Problem statement: The report on the responding to terrorism in Britain proves that Britain plays an important role in terrorism mitigation in the international arena, but internal (within the United Kingdom) and external problems (global spread of terrorism) cause imminent threat to Britain in general. Background The origin of terrorism in Britain can be broadly divided into two: internal threats from those who fight for free Northern Ireland (IRA), from the Islamic terrorist groups that operate from UK and the treat from international terrorist groups operate from the Middle East Asia. Wayne C. Thompson stated that, “A Times poll showed that 86% of British respondents supported giving the police new powers to arrest people suspected of planning terrorist attacks” (74). ...
The Glasgow International Airport attack (2007) and Exeter bombing (2008) proved that the global spread of terrorism and Islamic extremism pose threat to Britain. Julian Richards made clear that, “We have mentioned that, in the UK, counter-terrorism work as we understand it today effectively began in 1883 with the formation of the Special Irish Branch by the Metropolitan Police in London, later renamed simply the Special Branch as it took on a wider range of work against extremist and terrorist activity” (50). So, one can see that rapid increase in the number of terrorist attacks forced the British authorities to adopt innovative measures to deal with terrorism in Britain. Responding to terrorism in Britain Earlier, the British response to terrorism was limited to the context of the attacks initiated by the Irish Republican Army. But in the 21st century, global spread of terrorism created much trouble in the multiracial society of Britain. Paul Thomas made clear that, “For Britain, the shock was different, as the 7/7 attacks were carried out by four young Yorkshiremen, all raised and educated, and some born, in Britain-‘ordinary’ young Britons with regional Yorkshire accents who had willingly killed themselves in order to also kill fellow Britons in the name of their understanding of Islam” (N.Pag.). To be specific, the Islamic extremists were able to influence some of the immigrants in Britain. This eventually led to extremist plots like London bombings in 2005. On the other side, the British response to terrorism is interconnected with anti-terrorist legislation under UK law. The Acts and laws aim to track down and limit the funding facilities of the terrorist groups, and detention of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Responding to terrorism in Britain Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Responding to terrorism in Britain Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1464250-you-can-choose-which-one-you-would-like-to-do-it
(Responding to Terrorism in Britain Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Responding to Terrorism in Britain Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1464250-you-can-choose-which-one-you-would-like-to-do-it.
“Responding to Terrorism in Britain Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1464250-you-can-choose-which-one-you-would-like-to-do-it.
ons of other nations perceived to be a threat to the state’s security. The information is sourced to evaluate and present it to policy makers to determine the next possible actions and response for state’s security management (Home Office, 2013, p. 1).
They are of the view that terrorists are being successful in persuading governments to accept their demands also to change their political decisions. The principal standard in terrorism studies i.e. the “strategic model” postulates terrorists to be “rational actors”.
To prevent the acts of terrorism, especially nuclear terrorism, law enforcement and intelligence agencies should define the scope of skills and resources needed to executive a successful attack, the signs and symptoms of an intention to conduct an attack involving nuclear materials, access and availability of nuclear weapons among terrorist groups, as well as the locations that are most likely to be targeted.
Manifestation of envy and selfishness, vanity and morbid fanaticism inadvertently acquire in our imperfect society such diabolical forms as terrorism. The experience of recent years, especially in our country, showed that terrorists most commonly use explosive devices in preference to solve the problems of political, religious or ethnic character.
Terrorism is one of the most serious threats facing humanity in the 21st century. This paper examines the history of terrorism in the United States with special focus on the motives of the attacks, methods applied to execute attacks and the underlying events that instigated the attacks in the country.
Although the pace of terrorism has enhanced very rapidly, still development of counter-terrorism has also amplified the level of intricacy to establish peace and steadiness in the world. Counter-terrorism is referred as the procedures, techniques and strategies utilised by the governments, police departments, militaries and varied investigating organisations to circumvent terrorist threats.
The author states that in order to qualify as an act of terror, a violent act must be perpetrated for ideological and political purposes. Use of coercive violence for religious purposes constitutes an act of terror. One similarity of all terrorist attacks is that violence employed as a means of coercion affects both combatants and civilians.
Hence terrorism never had any particular definition in the criminal law. However, it does involve fear, violence, murder and other forms of physical and emotional harm. All of these acts are actually based upon personal and national goals. Although they
Third, terrorists seek to establish public sympathy. Through the attacks, they can warn their enemies and inflict fear in them. Fourth, terrorists seek to provoke a government to respond. Such responses are
Some individuals suggest that the terrorist threat does not deserve the resources and attention it currently gets. A justification of the response and attention that terrorism gets can be drawn from the uncertainty of terrorist acts and the increasing acts of terrorism around the world.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Responding to terrorism in Britain"
with a personal 20% discount.