The purpose of this assignment has not been to ascribe blame to the causal factors in what transpired during the Cold War, it has been the intention of this author to categorize these actions from as nearly a non-biased standpoint as possible…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Responsibility"
Download file to see previous pages
Although many in the West have been conditioned to believe that many, if not all, determinant factors for what contributed to the Cold War can be blamed on the Soviet Union, a careful analysis of the facts and the history, as well as the personalities involved, shows quite a different story. However, rather than stating that the United States and its policies, military actions, intentions, and security concerns were the main reasons for the Cold War, this brief analysis will attempt to show that both actors contributed nearly equally to precipitate many of the escalations that occurred during the Cold War years. As a function of examining the theory of containment, the effects of the United State’s use of the atom bomb, and a nuanced and established policy of quid-pro-quo security maneuvers in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America, the reader can come to a more full and complete understanding of what causal factors helped to shape the conflict as well the level to which both actors contributed to the furtherance of hostilities.
With respect to the very start of the Cold War, the confrontation between East and West was almost nearly inevitable as a function of the fact that the defeat of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan served to differentiate the world into a bipolar power structure. This power structure was the first of its kind in the world. Whereas similar regional powers had dominated global affairs for distinct periods of time, this was the first situation in which the world was practically and literally divided by ideology and economic systems. As such, the distrust and level of suspicion between these two superpowers was heightened even prior the end of the Second World War. Furthermore, even if the two superpowers had shared an economic system and a general belief and understanding of a unique world view, such a conflict would still have been likely due to the unique power dynamic that hegemonies exhibit in their quest to prove their power absolutely within their respective spheres of influence. Due to the fact that spheres of influence for these two superpowers were amorphous and undefined, the conflict between the two was accentuated. Likewise, the addition of new territories as a result of the land acquisition that occurred as a function of the Second World War, served to further increase feelings of distress and worries within the United States. From the American perspective, the Soviet Union was rapidly increasing its territorial holdings with no regard for the self-determination of the people groups that it was absorbing. Similarly, from the Soviet Union’s perspective, the United States and its allies were now practically and literally surrounding the nation. This fact may seem odd to a Western perspective as it is understood that the Soviet Union was so vast and so incomprehensibly large that “surrounding” such an entity would be impossible. However, from the Soviet Union’s perspective, there were now hundreds of thousands of Allied troops in surrounding occupied European countries.3 Similarly, nations on the southern border of the Soviet Union were becoming host to a series of pro-Western regimes; Iran at that time was but one example of this. Additionally, although the United States decried the Soviet occupation of Poland, the United States had tens of thousands of troops stationed in Japan. This type of action only served to further increase the level of suspicion and hostility that existed at the time. Although perhaps unintentional in many ways, these types of actions only served to exacerbate fears within the military power structure of both nations that a confrontation was imminent. As such, the conflict itself proceeded into a new stage of development. As each and every stage of the Cold War can be understood as a function of a zero-sum game, the United States and its allies attempted at every turn to deprive the Soviet Union of any type of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Essay”, n.d.)
Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1460549-cold-war-an-analysis-of-root-causes-and-overall-levels-of-responsibility
(Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Essay)
Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1460549-cold-war-an-analysis-of-root-causes-and-overall-levels-of-responsibility.
“Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1460549-cold-war-an-analysis-of-root-causes-and-overall-levels-of-responsibility.
In essence, the war can be described as the persistent state of military and political tension between the two states. The Soviet Union and its associates were branded as the Eastern bloc while the United States and their allies were referred to as the Western bloc (Leffler, 2008).
The fear of nuclear escalation did not allow the two economies to indulge into an active war therefore; this war is known as Cold War. This war is different from the other wars because it was not an active war and it was fought through propagandas, military clashes, economic clashes and diplomatic bargaining.
After the Potsdam Conference and the uprising in Greece, several factors were clear that the Soviet leaders were not going to give up their control over the Eastern Europe and the Middle East. This perception of Truman’s Administration about the communist Russia’s expansionist intention played a crucial role in determining the United States’ cold-war policies.
Even though economic supremacy may be the commonest form of national supremacy that can be counted the world over, this is not the only form of exhibiting of supremacy. In early 19th Century and early part of the 20th century, conquering in wars was a major premise through which various countries stamped firm supremacy on others.
They used words as their weapons. They tried to show their opponents lower from each other. They played havoc with conflicts in different regions of the world as in case of Hot War, there would be much danger due to use of nuclear weapons.
Soviet Union took its alliance that were having communist system or were favoring the communist system.
The emergence of superpowers after world war two was among the contributing factors to the cold war. The western block (consisting of the United States of America and other NATO country members against eastern bloc eastern bloc. A neutral block founded by India, Egypt, and Yugoslavia.
phrase as it involved undeclared conflicts and tensions between the Soviet Union and United States whose causes, and the exact start date have not been exactly identified. Consequently, the commencing of the cold war is still a contentious issue today with debaters reflecting
This report has been written in an attempt to explore types of war and terrorism and the root causes of war and terrorism. According to the research, war-torn nations now receive around an overall of 20 – 25 percent of funds from the World Bank. This is far more than the meager fund of 16 percent in 1998. World Bank also gels well with war-torn countries as a obey commands.
The United State’s strategy during the Cold War shifted slightly, but also remained surprisingly constant. One of the pillars of this strategy was not ever involving the United States in direct confrontation with the Soviet Union: there was a very real fear that any direct confrontation between the two would lead to a nuclear war.
This event provided stimulus for continuously sustaining and expanding the U.S. military capability after the end of WWII and to a higher end, remedied the ‘great depression’ by converging to resolve with political changes the economic and cultural crises alike.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Cold War: An Analysis of Root Causes and Overall Levels of Responsibility"
with a personal 20% discount.