Two rhetorical analysis paragraphs - Essay Example

15 April Rhetorical analysis: In her highly insightful article, Ana Acton takes a stance against assisted suicide. However, her article stands distinguished among a plethora of other articles written on assisted suicide in that she openly labels the practice of opposing assisted suicide “decidedly progressive”. Much has been written about the subject of assisted suicide, but there is a still a general lack of awareness regarding its underlying mechanisms. Acton does a wonderful job of not only explaining why assisted suicide should be condemned, rather she goes all the way through to question the long-held conventional ideas.

For example, she digs with acute intelligence into assisted killing of patients with long history of depression and stress by sympathetic doctors. Her debate targets such sympathetic doctors who in the name of sympathy end lives when all their patients need is proper mental health care and a little compassion. Acton’s take on the highly complicated subject of assisted suicide is quite intriguing because it leaves readers immersed in intricate thought processes. It also urges readers to question their beliefs about assisted suicide.

It motivates many readers to change their opinion and assume that assisted suicide is not actually progressive, rather opposing it makes a person progressive in every literal sense of the word. In context of the Aristotelian Appeals, Acton is found using logical appeals to augment her argument. For example, she is seen making a logical appeal when she provides succinct case studies of patients pertaining to idea being promoted. Acton does not fire arrow in thin air as she has years of professional experience of helping people with problems.

On grounds of such concrete experience, she advocates the idea of opposing assisted suicide as it is actually a way of facilitating untimely demise of a patient with a physical or mental health issue. In contrast to Ana Acton who takes a self-proclaimed progressive approach to the highly controversial subject of assisted suicide, George Dvorsky is seen doing exactly the opposite in his equally insightful and informative article. Information provided by the author in this article can also be characterized as logical because evidence is provided to appeal the case.

Also, Dvorsky makes use of ethical appeals in his article and benefits from them to a remarkable extent. For example, the audience is reminded of how ethically and morally responsible they can become by defending people’s right to die. Dvorsky’s stance is that opposing assisted suicide is not progressive, rather allowing it is an ethical responsibility of people. The beauty of the article lies in not what is said by the author to forward his argument to the world, rather it is embedded in how Dvorsky defends his argument.

The kind of defensive techniques employed by the author do not comes across as challenging, rather they serve to make readers sit back and re-think their beliefs without feeling offended. Another riveting aspect of this article is that it is a uniquely well-structured piece. Ideas are not thrown at readers in a haphazard manner assuming readers can make up their own minds as they go through the article. Rather, readers are very expertly guided through the article point by point which is a technique that serves to consolidate Dvorsky’s argument.

It is worth mentioning here that many times it is not what is said in an article, but how it is said which makes the real difference and helps an article to stand out among the rest.