Analysis of On Human Bioenhancements Article - Essay Example

Firstly, with regards to an identification of the argument, it must be understood that the author’s primary approach is focusing upon the argument that bio-enhancement and the development of humans to manage and change the realities of chromosomal DNA exists, these should not always be used. Moreover, the claim and reason that exists within this article is concerning an understanding that even though the possibility to create and alter human biology from a laboratory standpoint most certainly exists, a level of bioethics and moral concern for the future fate of this particular industry has thus far constrained individuals that might otherwise be interested in turning a profit via utilizing such an approach.

Although the structure and organization of this particular article are above standard, a key concern that can be noted is the overall exhibition of evidence and discussion of the fact that exist within the article. Firstly, even though data is represented and sources are cited effectively, the type and extent of this data do not specifically help to corroborate the initial argument that was stated within the preceding paragraph. Moreover, the article itself ultimately collapses into a mere discussion of the technology that exists and a broader understanding of the process of biological engineering.

Although this discussion is of course interesting, it does not coincide with the analysis and promise of engaging the reader in the argument that was initially presented. Instead, these statistics and data that are represented do not help the reader to draw any level of inference with regards to the original argument nor are they particularly helpful in understanding the issue to a greater degree. Although statistics and data are indeed represented, as well as relevant citations, none of these serve the ultimate purpose and appeared to be somewhat gratuitous; only existing to the fact that they are somehow required.

Finally, concerning reviewing the argument in terms of its purpose and audience, it can be definitively stated that the purpose of the argument was to shed a further level of discussion about bioethics and bioengineering. However, to engage with the audience, as with any form of print journalism, a type of controversy and fear had to be engaged about how runaway/rogue scientists could impact upon the future fate of the human race, biological development, and/or nouveau eugenics.