Points To Consider - Article Example

The Iliad: Points to Consider The conflict between Achilles and Agamemnon can best be described as approach-avoidance conflict because there is tension over Achilles decision to leave the war and then return. Achilles was offended by the arrogance of Agamemnon, yet he returns to fight against the Trojans despite their disagreements.2. The most effective leader in this case is Agamemnon because although his people have been involved in a long and bloody war, he still manages to uplift the morale of the troops.

Also, despite the presence of Achilles, Agamemnon puts aside whatever personal conflict the pair has so that they can focus on winning the war.3. Achilles and Agamemnon only fell into conflict with each other after the war had already been going ten years. Their disagreements did not totally prevent the Greeks from achieving their ultimate goals, but it did hinder them somewhat. The conflict could not have really been avoided because they were two characters typical of Greek culture at that time: strong-willed alpha males who wanted personal glory for themselves more so than the aims of their nation.

Chimate Chumbolo: Points to Consider1. The reason why Chimate Chumbolo tried to persuade the Dita people to use their own customs first is due to the fact that the culture was one based on mutual understanding where people were given the authority to solve their own differences. Also, it cost a lot to take disputes to Ethiopian courts, so convenience did play a large part in the decision.2. It was important for Chimate Chumbolo to educate her people through a mediatory role because she understood Ethiopian law as well as Dita customs.

She acted like a go-between for the Dita people and the Ethiopian government.3. If a mediation meeting goes badly, Chimate Chumbolo first threatens each party by quoting a fake Ethiopian law that would punish each party severely, thus giving them incentive to work out their dispute by themselves.The Federalist: Number 10: Points to Consider1. Madison says that a democracy is where a government is made up of only a small amount of people, even though it is elected by a majority. A republic is where the government must answer to a greater number of citizens and thus has more power over them.2. Madison saw a danger in allowing a majority faction to run a political structure that would divide the country.

If one group had complete control of the government, it would be free to impose any laws it liked on the people.3. Madison concedes that factions are a necessary evil in a political system, but he says that we must limit the damage they can have on society. Factions can be present in a republican form of government because they have to work out their differences.4. The current American political system is getting away from being a republic and turning into more of a democracy. Different factions are beginning to take concerns, and this is something that Madison warned against.5. A large organization can prevent factions from destroying it because it is more secure with greater numbers.

If an organization is small then it is weak, thus allowing factions to take control of it.