Stop the Violence: The Case Against Pot Prohibition - Essay Example

(4) Furthermore, the authors also assumed that regulation of marijuana just like with tobacco would potentially decrease the level of its usage or consumption. The authors were implying the best possible outcomes of regulation and taxation of marijuana, in short, this talks about issues on legalization. One of the probable strengths of the authors’ argument is its being positive about the subject matter especially on the cost and crime control. The entire argument is substantially focused on the cost and crime control.

The authors were appealing to the human emotion that crime is substantially not good, and it should be totally eradicated. The authors should know this because they are internal medicine specialist and police officer by profession. However, the substantial weakness of their argument can be seen on their lack of providing sufficient data to directly link, for instance, with the percentage of crimes committed regarding marijuana distribution, usage and consumption. Furthermore, the authors focused so much on a certain perspective without considering the adverse impacts that may be brought by abusive or excessive usage of marijuana.

At some point, this may be answered by regulation, but still the authors lack sufficient data or evidence to support their claim. Thesis statement: The authors therefore failed to substantially support with related information on the very critical point of their stand against the government’s prohibition of marijuana. A clear definition of legalized marijuana The authors defined marijuana to be legal when it is regulated by the government and so potential tax must be obtained out from it. This is for the sole purpose of funding the government’s drug and law enforcement activities and decreasing marijuana’s level of consumption.

Marijuana has become illegal because the government together with its law prohibits it in the first place. With this, the authors indirectly defined legalization of marijuana by pointing out circumstances associated with its prohibition. The authors simply were trying to point out that if marijuana would have been legalized, then violence and gang crimes that are related to it will substantially be addressed. There is no clear point if they will be eliminated or not. Thus, a direct legalized term for marijuana was not clearly established.

Discuss emotional appeal and appeal of authority is it ligament or not First, the authors discussed crimes most especially the gang violence that is in line with it. They talked about discomforts, additional expenses and the likelihood of tedious works of police officers for crime prevention and culprit identification – all of which the authors pointed out to be associated with the prohibition of marijuana. This is entirely appealing to the emotion as they substantially failed to provide fair information on the subject matter.

Their point was to convince the reader with a faulty cause and effect. They were like simply saying that marijuana prohibition causes gang-related violence. They know for the fact that when violence has to be brought about as a subject matter, individuals will substantially give important focus on it. However, the authors failed to provide actual data of crimes committed related to gang violence associated with marijuana prohibi