Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Case Study – Theresa Schiavo (Add (Add (Add Date) Case Study – Theresa Schiavo The plight of Terri (Theresa) Schiavo gives a tragic valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings enveloped within Terri have been well discussed by several personalities in the fields of medicine, law, and ethics…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study"

Case Study – Theresa Schiavo (Add (Add (Add Case Study – Theresa Schiavo The plight of Terri (Theresa) Schiavo gives a tragic valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings enveloped within Terri have been well discussed by several personalities in the fields of medicine, law, and ethics. In the midst of media saturation and higher public interest, large amount of confusion hang back about the diagnosis of unrelenting vegetative state of the case, and the judicial process and ethical framework related to Terri’s care. Several issues are associated with the Terri Schiavo case, such as ethical, psychological, medical, religious, legal, and philosophical. Researchers, on the Terri Schiavo case have analyzed what would happen when a patient lacks advance directives, or when one is not able to express one’s own wants due to cognitive loss or being in Persistent Vegetative State (PVS). The lack of legalized documentation, at last brought in an ethical situation. Stopping nourishment for patients who happen to be in a constant vegetative stage is undoubtedly an exposition of ethical dilemma. Issues regarding ethical values directly pose questions about quality of life, standards of living, responsibilities, and choices of the family members. The Terri Schiavo case is associated with a young woman, spending approximately 15 years of her life in a vegetative state. It is also concerned about the conflicts and issues occurred between Terri’s parents and her husband. The central issue of the case was about who must decide her fate. As described in Schiavo Case Resources (2006), in 1990, Terri collapsed from cardiac arrest, stopped breathing and suffered from severe brain damage. She was lying for 15 years, the period which the doctors diagnosed as a vegetative state. She was sustained by a feeding tube, which later became a much argued issue in the court battle between her husband and her parents. She was affected by a heart attack at the age of 27 as a result f electrolyte imbalance secondary to a suspected struggle with bulimia (Schiavo Case Resources, 2006). Terri’s parents wanted to keep the feeding tube for sustaining her life. On the other hand, her husband wanted to get the feeding tube removed. The Schiavo case seems to be very complex with many points to consider. One of them was the argument upon diagnosing the Permanently Vegetative State (PVS) versus a minimal conscious state of the person. Michael Schiavo, her husband argued that Terri was in a permanently vegetative state while her parents argued that she was only in a minimally conscious state. One important ethical question that arises at this situation is when does life end or where. Robert and Mary Schindler seemed more reasonable on their decision than that of Michael Schiavo. They were willing to take up the moral obligation of the issue. They had the right to petition court decision as they were more justifiable than her husband. The ethical element of the issue was looked into by her parents by deciding to preserve the feeding tube. In the beginning, both Michael Schiavo, her spouse, and Terri’s parents were together taking caring of Terri along with the staff at a hospital. But later, Michael Schiavo was appointed legal guardian and surrogate in caring Terri. However, on the ethical perspective, her parents had the moral obligation to continue Terri’s care as her parents. The decision to remove the feeding tube and slowly letting her die cannot be substantiated as the intermittent reflexive smiling and other behavioral changes in Terri had given hope to people who cared for her. The arguments of Michael Schiavo cannot be justified in any case, though his intentions were given attention during the case. He had many conflicts of interest within himself in taking care of Terri which cannot be simply rationalized with any morale concern. In letting Terri’s doctors to take off her feeding tube, he stood to get benefited from a malpractice settlement. He was much inclined to his girlfriend. Such misleading intention of Michael Schiavo sparked the ethical concerns of the community. The case analysis shows that the ethical principles were violated in the case of Theresa (Terri) Schiavo. As Beauchamp and Childress (1994) point out, the principle of Beneficence asks the clinician to promote the interests of the patient, as well as the non-maleficence-duty demand for not to do any harm (p.259). in the given case, both these ethical principles were seen violated. According to Ashcroft, Dawson, and Draper (2007, p. 5), many fundamental rules in the common morality are the obligation to avoid causing any harm, which include guidelines such as, do not kill, do not cause pain, do not disable, etc. Besides, the principles provide respect for the patient’s autonomy, which keeps up the parent’s health related values. As Jeffrey (2006, p. 35) points out, autonomy can be referred as the ability to think, decide and act on the basis of such thinking and decision, freely and independently. The parents seemed deprived of their right to preserve the life of their daughter. Finally, according to the National Institutes of Health, the justice element of the ethical principle demands to treat the patient fairly according to their medical needs. References Ashcroft, R. E., Dawson, A, Draper, H & McMillan, R. J. (2007). Principles of Health Care Ethics. England: John Wiley and Sons. Beauchamp, T. L & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. UK: Oxford University Press. Jeffrey, D. (2006). Patient-centered Ethics and Communication at the End of Life. UK: Radcliffe Publishing. National Institute of Health: Office of Human Subjects Research. Department of Health Education. (18 April, 1979). “Regulations and ethical guidelines: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research”. Retrieved from Schiavo case resources: Key events in the case of Theresa Marie Schiavo. (13 October, 2011). University of Miami. Retrieved from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from
(Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words.
“Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study


...?It is imperative to begin by explaining the meaning of a contract in order to get a clear understanding of the circumstances surrounding Jill Johansen’s case. Basically, a contract can be loosely defined as an agreement between parties which is enforceable by law. One party promises to do something to the other and the other party agrees and this becomes legally binding and enforceable in the court of law. Thus, this analysis seeks to evaluate the laws and elements of proof must she prove in this case when she is unceremoniously fired from her post. Damages as well as remedies that can be awarded will also be explored. In this particular case, Jill has to prove the kind as well as the...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

The Schiavo Case: Ethics and the End of Life : What have you Learned from this Dilemma cornerstone elements of many moral decisions throughout society, it seems that in questions of end-of-life decisions they have held back progress in legal decision-making. Few would contend that religion should be prohibited, but just as restrictions are placed on the extent that spirituality can influence state laws, similarly these end-of-life questions should be based on principles of human rights rather than religious standards. Not until laws are designed based on human rights principles will more progress be made in terms of these ethical dilemmas. In conclusion, this has considered what I have learned from the case study The Schiavo Case: Ethics and the End of Life. Within this...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study


...Affiliation: Case study – LAW Introduction A case study is a statistical method of data collection, recordingand presenting of information relating to a specific person, group of people in a specified area or a situation over a period of time. One of the iconic pioneers of law in health issues was Dr. John Snow (Goodman, et al 3). This came after an outbreak of cholera and thus states had to enact proper rules to regulate the spread of this contagious disease. The practice of Medicine is entwined to the practice of Law (Corfield, et al 1). Thus, medical practitioners at one point or another are required to give either written or oral evidence in courts of law. This study...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Company Law - English law

...(a) It was established in Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897 that 'The company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers. Nor aresubscribers as members liable, in any shape or form, except to the extent and in the manner provided by the [Companies] Act.'2 It is a general principle of English law that it is not possible in the absence of agency, a trust relationship or wrongful trading to hold one person liable for the debts of another.3 However, like most common law principles and judicial interpretations it is a rebuttable presumption which must give way to a statement to the contrary 'in clear and unequivocal language'4 by Parliament. Under its equitable discretion the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

LLB Law - Contract Law

... as a right, interest, profit or benefit to one party, or some forbearance, detriment suffered or undertaken by another. Consideration is the normal 'badge of enforcement' in English Law. Taking a further look at this case the consideration was the amount of money that Mr Baron offered to Mr Taylor in exchange for the goods at the promised time. However Mr Taylor suffered detriment when the full amount of money was not paid. Consideration was given when Mr Baron asked for all all the costumes for the waiters to be delivered before the club opened. Mr Taylor met all the requirements for the contract to be valued whereas Mr Baron did not fulfill the requirements of the contract. The case also deals with executed consideration... , for this to...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Business Law - land law

...from another person's Last Will and Testament. Yet another common example is where two or more persons have received separate deeds to the same parcel of real estate." Black's Law (2006). With all things considered, Bill Bob would need to clarify questions that would assist legal counsel in determining whether or not he has a solid case. The questions he needs to answer are as follows: First, is he related to any of the previous owner's, if so, what is his relation to them Hill Bob could have rights to the land through a death decree due to his relation to the previous owners. "Unknown to the owner, a third person - a "squatter" - may be in illegal and unauthorized occupation of a far corner of the land parcel. If...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study


...LAW QUESTION ANSWER Before embarking upon the reply to this question, it would be appropriate to define gambling, as well as the wagering contract. Gambling or gaming is an agreement between two or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager, which will become the property of the winner and to which all involved make a contribution. (Quoted in hence, an agreement is gambling provided it fulfils the following conditions: An agreement between two or more individuals or parties The agreement is made in order to play a game of chance collectively The game is for stake or wager The winner would be the sole beneficiary of the property contributed for the game... , but (b)...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study


... number Analysis of v. Guthrie case Ohio-1264 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 21, This case was heard on March 21 2012 It falls under the appeal type of case Facts The appellant in this case had been charged with first degree murder after he killed a colleague at work. He argued that he had various psychiatric problems at the time. In addition, it was a heated moment that led to the killing in the heat of passion. Before the killing the two of them got along well. On the day of the killing, the victims and other colleagues were making jokes about the way the appellant was in a foul mood. It is with this that the appellant snapped a towel around the victim leading to the killing. The appellant had a number of psychiatric problems. He argued... number...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study


...Case Study Number Case study Introduction In English law, bringing on criminal harm as well as damage was initially a typical law offense. The offense was generally concerned with the security of abodes and the nourishment supply, and few approvals were forced for harming individual property. Obligation was initially limited to the installment of harms by method for recompense. As time passed, particular laws were acquainted with arrangement with specific circumstances as they were judged to oblige intercession, most especially close by the ascent of automation and urbanization throughout the Industrial Revolution. The advanced law of criminal harm is for the most part...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Sciavo Case

...Terri Schiavo Case Analysis Terri Schiavo’s case is a of a legal struggle concerning prolonged life supporting in the in the U.S.A. Terri Schiavo sustained a permanent injury on the brain due to lack oxygen after collapsing in the hall of her apartment on 25 February, 1990 at the age of 26 years. She had not prepared a living will, and she did not have a durable attorney’s power. Four months after her injury, she was rendered incompetent and her husband, Mr Schiavo was appointed her lawful guardian without opposition from her parents. The brain injury had rendered her incapable to swallow and to keep her nourished and alive; a feeding tube was placed on...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study for FREE!

Contact Us