StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Case Study – Theresa Schiavo (Add (Add (Add Date) Case Study – Theresa Schiavo The plight of Terri (Theresa) Schiavo gives a tragic valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings enveloped within Terri have been well discussed by several personalities in the fields of medicine, law, and ethics…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study"

Case Study – Theresa Schiavo (Add (Add (Add Case Study – Theresa Schiavo The plight of Terri (Theresa) Schiavo gives a tragic valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings enveloped within Terri have been well discussed by several personalities in the fields of medicine, law, and ethics. In the midst of media saturation and higher public interest, large amount of confusion hang back about the diagnosis of unrelenting vegetative state of the case, and the judicial process and ethical framework related to Terri’s care. Several issues are associated with the Terri Schiavo case, such as ethical, psychological, medical, religious, legal, and philosophical. Researchers, on the Terri Schiavo case have analyzed what would happen when a patient lacks advance directives, or when one is not able to express one’s own wants due to cognitive loss or being in Persistent Vegetative State (PVS). The lack of legalized documentation, at last brought in an ethical situation. Stopping nourishment for patients who happen to be in a constant vegetative stage is undoubtedly an exposition of ethical dilemma. Issues regarding ethical values directly pose questions about quality of life, standards of living, responsibilities, and choices of the family members. The Terri Schiavo case is associated with a young woman, spending approximately 15 years of her life in a vegetative state. It is also concerned about the conflicts and issues occurred between Terri’s parents and her husband. The central issue of the case was about who must decide her fate. As described in Schiavo Case Resources (2006), in 1990, Terri collapsed from cardiac arrest, stopped breathing and suffered from severe brain damage. She was lying for 15 years, the period which the doctors diagnosed as a vegetative state. She was sustained by a feeding tube, which later became a much argued issue in the court battle between her husband and her parents. She was affected by a heart attack at the age of 27 as a result f electrolyte imbalance secondary to a suspected struggle with bulimia (Schiavo Case Resources, 2006). Terri’s parents wanted to keep the feeding tube for sustaining her life. On the other hand, her husband wanted to get the feeding tube removed. The Schiavo case seems to be very complex with many points to consider. One of them was the argument upon diagnosing the Permanently Vegetative State (PVS) versus a minimal conscious state of the person. Michael Schiavo, her husband argued that Terri was in a permanently vegetative state while her parents argued that she was only in a minimally conscious state. One important ethical question that arises at this situation is when does life end or where. Robert and Mary Schindler seemed more reasonable on their decision than that of Michael Schiavo. They were willing to take up the moral obligation of the issue. They had the right to petition court decision as they were more justifiable than her husband. The ethical element of the issue was looked into by her parents by deciding to preserve the feeding tube. In the beginning, both Michael Schiavo, her spouse, and Terri’s parents were together taking caring of Terri along with the staff at a hospital. But later, Michael Schiavo was appointed legal guardian and surrogate in caring Terri. However, on the ethical perspective, her parents had the moral obligation to continue Terri’s care as her parents. The decision to remove the feeding tube and slowly letting her die cannot be substantiated as the intermittent reflexive smiling and other behavioral changes in Terri had given hope to people who cared for her. The arguments of Michael Schiavo cannot be justified in any case, though his intentions were given attention during the case. He had many conflicts of interest within himself in taking care of Terri which cannot be simply rationalized with any morale concern. In letting Terri’s doctors to take off her feeding tube, he stood to get benefited from a malpractice settlement. He was much inclined to his girlfriend. Such misleading intention of Michael Schiavo sparked the ethical concerns of the community. The case analysis shows that the ethical principles were violated in the case of Theresa (Terri) Schiavo. As Beauchamp and Childress (1994) point out, the principle of Beneficence asks the clinician to promote the interests of the patient, as well as the non-maleficence-duty demand for not to do any harm (p.259). in the given case, both these ethical principles were seen violated. According to Ashcroft, Dawson, and Draper (2007, p. 5), many fundamental rules in the common morality are the obligation to avoid causing any harm, which include guidelines such as, do not kill, do not cause pain, do not disable, etc. Besides, the principles provide respect for the patient’s autonomy, which keeps up the parent’s health related values. As Jeffrey (2006, p. 35) points out, autonomy can be referred as the ability to think, decide and act on the basis of such thinking and decision, freely and independently. The parents seemed deprived of their right to preserve the life of their daughter. Finally, according to the National Institutes of Health, the justice element of the ethical principle demands to treat the patient fairly according to their medical needs. References Ashcroft, R. E., Dawson, A, Draper, H & McMillan, R. J. (2007). Principles of Health Care Ethics. England: John Wiley and Sons. Beauchamp, T. L & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. UK: Oxford University Press. Jeffrey, D. (2006). Patient-centered Ethics and Communication at the End of Life. UK: Radcliffe Publishing. National Institute of Health: Office of Human Subjects Research. Department of Health Education. (18 April, 1979). “Regulations and ethical guidelines: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research”. Retrieved from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html Schiavo case resources: Key events in the case of Theresa Marie Schiavo. (13 October, 2011). University of Miami. Retrieved from http://www6.miami.edu/ethics/schiavo/timeline.htm Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1432678-theresa-schiavo
(Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1432678-theresa-schiavo.
“Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1432678-theresa-schiavo.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study

Comparison of Constructive Trust with the Remedy of Restitution under the Common Law

When trying to locate the property loss because of a transfer made under a breach of trust, there are certain issues that need to be taken into account. At the first level, the remedies available by the relevant legal texts tend to differentiate not only regarding their requirements but also their level of protection provided. On the other hand, the application of the rules of common law instead of the ones of equity has to be considered thoroughly and the party that suffered the damage has to evaluate all the parameters regarding his choice as each of the above legal paths has its own advantages. From a general point of view, it has been stated that ‘a person who confers a benefit, normally a money payment, under a mistake,...
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study

Canadian Corporate Business Law

This was done by virtue of a loan to Ashley in the sum of $300,000 providing Temper with a first mortgage against the suite.
Two politicians invest in Temper, Stefan di Yawn who invests $500,000 in respect of 500 Class A shares and Bob Eh invests $100,000 for 100 Class A shares. In order to secure these investments, the politicians take a security interest in Temper. Shortly after the company experiences some difficulty beginning with Angelina who is photographed spitting on the sidewalks which gets the attention of politician Hillary Squinton who ran her campaign on a clean sidewalks platform. She initiates action against Angelina by taking the matter up with Spitting on Streets Board chaired by Angelina’s boyfriend Br...
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Family Law: Breakdown Of Marriage

In general, contesting a divorce is a difficult issue and grounds for divorce are generally allowed by the Courts. If one party makes a decision that the marital relationship is no longer working, the Courts are likely to accept this decision and grant the divorce.

While adultery is one of the important grounds for granting a divorce, John claims in this instance that he has not had an affair with Emma. Possibly, if this was the only issue at stake, he could have contested the divorce. However, there is also the additional issue of unreasonable behavior, which are also good grounds for the grant of a divorce. Isabel has made attempts to get him to see a therapist and has tolerated his depression and withdrawal during hi...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Evolution of the Law and Judicial Activism

In some instances, such fault had been the consequence of the inattention of the defendant. Accordingly, the courts associate fault with intentional offenses or carelessness of the parties involved. Moreover, courts determine the application of fault on wrongdoings or torts. Civil law determines fault in actions of parties where they had exercised less than reasonable care. This insufficient reasonable care would be sufficient to establish a prima facie fault. Previously, the courts had adhered to the principle of there being no liability without fault. Accordingly, a person could be held liable, only if he had committed some fault. This made it essential for a fault to exist. However, the commitment of a fault was not always suff...
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

English Administrative Law

In other words, just as the public is accountable to the government the government is likewise accountable to the public by virtue of judicial review. While these restraints on executive powers appear to compromise Parliamentary sovereignty, it is not necessarily so, since Parliament always retains the power to legislate against any decision rendered by the courts.2 The discussion that follows examines the restraints placed on the executive and the manner in which it could conceivably challenge concepts of parliamentary sovereignty in the context of the Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Fayed [1997] 1 All ER 228.
On the facts of the case, R v Secretary of State for the...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Organization and Functions of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Threats may either appear in the form of terrorism or from other intelligence groups or from the espionage. It may arise within the country, against the existing government or social systems. Though most of the federal law enforcement groups are investigative groups, they are not only focused on investigations but stand for the people. One can see that the importance of the federal agencies is growing day by day because the threats from militants and others have considerably increased. Such kinds of federal law enforcement agencies include Federal Air Marshalls, Secret Service, FBI, Untouchables, C.I.A and Federal Corrections etc. The organization and functions of these agencies vary in different fields and can be cited in the fol...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Company Law Issues

Various sections of the CA are coming into force over a staged process and the relevant provision relating to authority is sections 39 and 40, which came into force on 1 October 2007.

Section 39(1) of the CA provides that “the validity of any act done by a company shall not be called into question on the ground of lack of capacity by reason of anything in the company’s constitution”

Additionally, section 40(1) provides that: “In favor of a person dealing with a company in good faith, the power of the board of directors to bind the company, or authorize others to do so, shall be deemed to be free of any limitation under the company’s constitution”.

Section 40 (2)...
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Contract Law

This expression of willingness can assume several forms, such as a facsimile, letter, electronic mail or a telephonic message. The intention is an objective consideration and in the case of Smith v, Hughes 4 relevant consideration was deemed to be the manner in which a reasonable person would view intention. Furthermore, the law distinguishes between an offer and an invitation to treat. The latter is not an offer but merely an indication of willingness to negotiate a contract.

An instance of this is provided by the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council5. In this case, the phrase may be prepared to sell was held to constitute an invitation to treat and not an offer. Indeed, the Gibson decision challenged the tradition...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

International Law: Child Soldiers

Using children to fight wars is not only morally abhorrent but very bad very the physical and mental health of the children in question. That is in part why a series of international laws and treaties have come into effect to try to deal with this scourge. But the issue is more complicated than that. While child soldiers are victims of war crimes, they too can also perpetrate serious breaches of the law of armed conflict. Under normal circumstances, individuals who commit such acts, be they combatants or not,2 would be vulnerable to prosecution. However, because children in such situations are victims as well as perpetrators and because of the special protections afforded to children under international law, many have questioned w...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Theresa Schiavo Law Case Study for FREE!

Contact Us