Nobody downloaded yet

Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
An understanding of the analogy posed by Feynman is essential before a scientist draws conclusions or raises criticism. Ornithology is the study of birds, characterization, and conservation of species and geographical distribution of bird species. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds"

Download file to see previous pages Philosophers tend to question why things happen the way they do. Science is a field that establishes answers to the questionings from philosophy. According to Feynman, the philosophy of science is an aspect that helps scientists in immense ways although the scientist may never understand the ways in which it does all these. Feynman, as a physician believed in the empirical calculations of science and did not understand the philosophy surrounding science. However, his analogy gives scientists the impetus to analyze the importance of philosophy to science. There is a probability that philosophy contributes a whole lot to science but scientists do not notice. On the other hand, it would be rational to analyze how the two fields interrelate. Many scientists do not believe in philosophy today. This is contrary to what used to be the case before. Many scientists of the old times merged philosophy and science. In the old times, scientists combined science, philosophy, and theology. In the life of a scientist today, experimental evidence is fundamental to prove any theory right. Scientists need to understand and define methodologies that lead to a conclusion. Philosophy applies reasoning and rationality and is not an option for many scientists today. It is worth noting that most of scientific breakthroughs started as philosophical enquiries in the past. Pioneers in science found philosophy a worthwhile field and gave it some consideration as a field that could offer insights on nature (Lange, 2007:33). Albert Einstein is a good example of scientists who attached value to philosophy. In one of early books, Einstein argued that everyone should apply philosophy. Some philosophers argue that scientists should adopt...
Science and philosophy are two academic fields that seek to establish new knowledge and validate it to pass for the truth. Philosophy does the bigger part of validation and considers empirical; science as a source of information. Some scientists in the past have given philosophy a dismissal because of its lack of substantial evidence. A clear understanding of the two fields will help an individual realize the worth and role of philosophy. The two fields gather knowledge and qualify it as truth using different methods. Scientists should not expect philosophers to dwell on empirical calculations because philosophy as a field uses rationality and logic. On the other hand, science must use experiments and empirical data to ascertain its findings. The two fields may incline on the same issues but they tackle them differently. Philosophy of science plays a bigger role than Feynman claimed. Some critics argue that he contributed to physical philosophy although he did not acknowledge it. Feynman and his supporters overlooked the importance of philosophy. Underrating philosophy lacks justification because a close examination of its role indicates that it contributes greatly to science. The example of the contributions of philosophy of biology is an illustration that philosophy of science and science can complement each other. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Philosophy of Science Is about As Useful to Scientists As Ornithology Essay)
“Philosophy of Science Is about As Useful to Scientists As Ornithology Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
jamisonmills added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
The topic of "Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds" is quite popular among the tasks in high school. Still, this document opens a fresh perspective of seeing the problem. I’ll use the idea for my own research.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds

Russian scientists' contribution in the world science

...?Russian Scientists Introduction: Russians have always been found to have contributed greatly to the world of innovations and sciences. Few of the gadgets and the tools which we use in out day to day life are from the scientist who have innovated things throughout their lifetimes. Some of the remarkable contributors are Dmitri Mendeleev, who invented the Periodic Table of Elements. Sergei Vasilyevich Lebedev, who invented the synthetic rubber (polybutadiene). Aleksandr Loran who invented the fire fighting foam and foam extinguisher. Economist and Noble prize winner Leonid Vitaliyevich Kantorovich, founder of linear programming. Nikolai Basov, who invented laser. Now, in...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Philosophy of Social Science

...- pollution or unemployment. (Gordon, 3) The considering of this second aspect engendered by social science, connects it to ethics, to the study of values. Dealing with the concept of "philosophy of social science", the same author defines it as "the study of how we are able to know whether our notions or theories about empirical phenomena are true or false." (3) Another definition is that the philosophy of social science is the study of the logic and the methods of social sciences. This second definition appears in the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. According to the same source the problems it...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy of Science

...One notices that Popper's choice of demarcation criterion is determined by the aim of science, and that the aim of science is truth. What is still unknown is how Popper arrives at precisely the methodology he proposes. What is missing is the role that logic plays in selecting the demarcation criterion, and in formulating a methodology. For Popper, logic is decisive, because it alone determines what is possible, and what is not possible. In particular, it is logic that tells us that what we ideally want, namely certainty, cannot be procured. The problem arises in the following way. If truth is the aim of science, then the scientist is specifically...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Poltical science - political philosophy appropriately digest these pieces of information and emotions, then, philosophy can be said to be incredibly dangerous to the proper function of society as those in lower stations may forget where they are supposed to function. However, Plato is not completely against poetry as he recognizes in it the ability to transmit the ethical ideas and concepts encouraged by the state in a more agreeable manner. He even uses it himself as part of his means of persuasion regarding the perfection of his republic. “Plato himself uses many superb poetic images in the course of his arguments. Likewise worship of the gods, religion and mythology were forbidden, yet Plato himself includes several...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Philosophy of science

...Running Head: Philosophy of Science – Problem of Induction Philosophy of Science – Problem of Induction [Institute’s Philosophyof Science – Problem of Induction Introduction Since centuries, suppositions have remained an imperative part of human lives, and it is an observation that humans, especially scientists have been successful in achieving the impossible based on their inductive inferences that indicate the significant contribution of presumptions in the human scientific society. Due to such significance of inductive suppositions, a huge number of experts, philosophers, and scientists1 have put efforts to evaluate and analyze the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

History and Philosophy Science

...of the rest. An individual with an argument that philosophy has made no progress has emphasis on the fact that there are still Aristotelians and not that Aristotelianism has failed to advance. Kuhn further illustrates that in music, the graphic arts, and literature, the practitioner gets his education by contact with the works of other artists, mainly earlier artists (Kuhn 1962). He explains that textbooks, except compendia or handbooks of original creations give only a secondary role. In philosophy, history, and the social sciences, textbook literature has a superior implication. In these fields, the basic college course uses parallel readings in original sources,...
10 Pages(2500 words)Book Report/Review

Philosophy of science

...Philosophy of science Kuhn’s account Kuhn’s normal science focuses on explaining scientific practice in a different perspective from Popper. According his philosophy, normal science is a research that aims at clarifying a concept provided by a certain paradigm. Kuhn does not support Popper’s idea of falsification because normal science prohibits falsify theories (Kuhn 23). He believes that instead of falsifying theories, scientists should use them to solve problems or to predict findings. Kuhn’s normal science supports the old theories and claims that scientists...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...Philosophy of Science Definition of stress within the Two Perspectives From a logical perspective, stress entails theamount of pressure that people experience that result to overtraining due to the mental condition it puts people into. The kind of stress can only be proved through scientific methods. The theory supports the fact that impractical ideas can only be accepted only if they can be measurable. According to the definition, stress can be said to exist if it can be quantified. It does not have any qualitative aspects. Those who enroll to the theory of thought put emphasize on using empirical research to define stress. However, the definition of stress from the proponents tends to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Philosophy of Science

...Response to questions of Philosophy of Science Response to Question There is a real risk in saying “real scientists”. This is because the concept “real scientists” implies that there are some scientists who are not real or pseudoscientists. This concept, therefore, would raise the critical question of demarcating between the “real scientists” and the “pseudoscientists”. Since there is no clear-cut and holistic criterion of demarcating the “real scientists” and the “pseudoscientists”, this practical attitude of terming some scientists “real scientists” and other...
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework

Philosophy of Science

...Undeterminism and Holism al Affiliation Even though it may appear that the empirical examples that are mentioned by Ladyman may be the only claims that underscore the importance of underdetermination, one cannot easily conclude that it is not a critical issue in science in general. In the philosophy of science there are situations in which evidence is needed to know a belief and a theory which holds and underdetermination therefore comes in to contexts in such situations1. Moreover, Descartes claims indirectly supports the underdetermination arguments plausible. His claims that human beings have knowledge about things and are capable of even discovering others including...
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy of Science is about as Useful to Scientists as Ornithology is to Birds for FREE!

Contact Us