Since centuries, suppositions have remained an imperative part of human lives, and it is an observation that humans, especially scientists have been successful in achieving the impossible based on their inductive inferences that indicate the significant contribution of…
Download file to see previous pages...
Such arguments have now resulted in the creation of a philosophical problem, the problem of induction that stands disputed, especially in case of the scientists that are in continuation of using this technique of considering limited number of instances to derive a universal formula.
In order to understand the problem of induction, the example of swans will be evident to provide an effective understanding of the issue. By means of induction, it was a universal principle that swans are white, as few centuries ago, people had only seen white swans, and the scientists were inclined to derive the declaration that all swans are white. In this regard, scientists have until today continued to magnify specific observations to create common principles to carry out their planning for prospects of the physical world. However, the major argument of the adversaries of this methodology argues regarding the validity of such suppositions based on only finite observations. Until today, various experts2 have argued over the problem of induction; however, historical evidence indicates that David Hume was the first person to inquire about this issue, and carry out analysis accordingly. During his analysis, he wrapped up by saying that inductive suppositions do not carry any logical explanations, and thus, it is incorrect for scientists to originate universal theories based on such finite observations3.
In response, various philosophers endeavored to come up with a solution; however, this problem of induction has remained a major problem in the Western philosophy due to its disputed nature. In this regard, Hume enjoys huge number of advocates until today; however, few of the experts have criticized Hume’s critique on the problem while concluding that although such inferences do not carry justifications4. However, it is erroneous to specify that science depend on the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Philosophy of science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1566656-philosophy-of-science
(Philosophy of Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Philosophy of Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1566656-philosophy-of-science.
This view gains ground for it also supports the theory of evolution proposed by science of evolutionary biology. However, the approach of ‘Creation Science’ which holds a trend to the Christian religion is creating controversial viewpoints about the history of the earth’s and universe’s existence.
Hempel, however, finds this use of induction ridiculous and untenable in a scientific situation. One of the major problems is that using induction to form the basis of a scientific experiment inherently involves the assumptions that it is supposed to remove, and is thus completely self defeating.
While discussing the philosophy of science two major names come before our vision. First is Kuhn and another is Popper. Thomas Kuhn was an American philosopher of science who forged a quite open, fundamental and democratic approach to science. He was a scholar and rebelled against the scientific establishment.
Scientists need to identify some of the risks involved in using induction and specifically the risks involved in using induction reasoning to come up with scientific principles as well as specific scientific judgments. Practically, induction throws up at least three general causes for concern:
led many to believe that Plato felt the philosopher could be an extreme danger to society, perhaps reinforced by the knowledge that he witnessed the execution of Socrates for his tendency to philosophize on the streets of ancient Greece. However, it is important to note that
The study considers classic philosophy of sciences as represented in the views of Popper and Lakatos (1999) and how it applies to psychology. It also considers the basics of statistical inference, comparing the theoretical basis of orthodox as viewed in Neyman Pearson
Kuhn considers paradigm as an important scientific tool that supports the continuation of a particular research. According to him, paradigm is a structure that contains the widely accepted views about phenomena. It has various roles in normal science. One of the roles of paradigm is the ability to determine what a researcher should study or research (Kuhn 43).
According to the definition, stress can be said to exist if it can be quantified. It does not have any qualitative aspects. Those who enroll to the theory of thought put emphasize on using empirical research to define
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy of science for FREE!